Quantum Physics and the End of Reality by Sabine Hossenfelder and Carlo Rovelli

Still work in progress. I haven't clearly set out that Bit and Bob have to be separate entities though associated so they are separable.

Likening the picture to 'bouncing oil droplets; The bit 'bubble is like the droplet. The bob wave, inherited sympathetic frequency, like the external disturbance associated with the droplet, but not it.

I think getting the probabilities of passing. There is the forwards travel direction and also orientation of magnetic and electric fields, which will affect interaction with the chemical structure of the polarizer. I'm still unclear about the role of each. Thinking about a theoretical landscape of probabilities varying over 360 degrees for each direction. If that is helpful I'm not sure.

Ejected 'bubble' electron holes do provide the moving charge needed for traveling magnetic and electric fields.

But not being material things with mass they can't in theory carry charge. [?] OK, its an absence of at least some the ubiquitous base existence so shouldn't.

Yet electron holes in a wire are said to be positively charged compared to the electrons. They too aren't material entities with mass but an absence.

Ejected 'bubble' electron holes do provide a [difference] that we can not call a charge in this context, but maybe can call it so in other contexts] source for the sustained traveling magnetic and electric fields. A Bit-photon body that possesses the fields that are expresses perpendicular to the Bit direction of travel.

The separable Bob wave, obtained by sympathetic vibration with parent atom, has to be different to the Bit motion dependent field waves.

What if the idea of electric field orientation being associated with polarization is wrong? Maybe its just going along with Bit. What if its a mechanical wave 'Bob' that's inherited from parent atom's vibration. That gets split, then recombined giving the interference pattern, affecting the location of Bit, Bob has thereby been dissipated and spread out giving the pattern. Yet Bit is still able to deliver the full amount of energy from the electron transition event. Making it detectable. So it probably isn't the electric fields making the interference pattern affecting Bit location

Electron transition leading to 'light'-particle ejection can be imagined as an explosive event - in which longitudinal energy is imparted to the ejected 'particle'. Which would (if not for atomic vibration), proceed straight. Like a bunched up slinky also being a characteristic of the Bit. It won't protrude with lateral orientations to get diminished by polarization or split by beam splitter , then recombined, interfering and dissipating. It will remain its full amount, one units worth until absorbed by detection. The vibration of the parent atom of the 'light' particle [Bit/bob-photon]at ejection could impart the transverse motion. The longitudinal 'bunched slinky energy focused on the Bit-photon. The Bob wave affecting the Bit and local environment. The environmental disturbance aspect is potentially separable from Bit allowing double slit type interference patterns to form.

Re quantum physics experiments, 'light' direction and orientation of polarization.

Using lasers fixed at the polarizing angle will give a fixed direction, so that won't bee a variable in the experiments . Which leaves transverse wave orientation as a variable. 360 degrees worth of rotation affecting probability of passing . Not just will/won't choice.

If already polarized some angles of orientation are already completely missing , so the full 360 of possible orientation with different probabilities is't correct 90 degrees and close to can de discounted.

Back to Bits and Bobs. Perhaps given the causal initial push the non mass Bit needs no more as it doesn't experience resistance from the environment as a mass would. What if the transverse Bob gives the polarization behaviour but having traveled to screen, for example, the Bit is absorbed delivering the compressed slinky-like electron transition unit of energy that's detected ' The Bob is stopped and dissipates either wholly into the base substance or partly into it and also partly into the screen material. Either way its amount being undetectable

What this picture consists of;

more than just classical wave.......there is a particle like energy carrier.....carried energy always whole unit.

more than classical corpuscle...a transverse associated wave responsible for wave like behavioral interactions.

Why else should the whole quantum of energy be locally detected after interference pattern formation in the environment.

more than just a field condition.... but base existence environmental disturbance is fields happening. So there is a field component.

http://viXra.org/abs/2211.0138

Bell's Inequalities: Walking Through Doorways and Don't Count Your Chickens...

Examination of the violation of Bell's inequalities. The how, why and what Bell's inequalities require and therefore must sometimes be violated in a universe where things happen rather than just exist. Identifying that what happens via a process is not the same as what is predicted just using prior existent traits. What are the implications for locality, realism and spacetime.

An analogy of a Bell's inequalities test is given.

I've tried to show the probabilistic results do not require a quantum mechanical reason. We need to be considering the complexity of the process of meeting polarizer chemical structure with a photon not asking is it a will or won't pass type.

Extended introduction to better explain what the paper is about.

The original paper is 5 pages double spaced. The additional intro. makes it 6

Hi Steve,

thank you for your nice comment and for reading the last paper

It has taken a long time for me to really understand the Bell's inequalities problem, but now I see. It's frequently presented as if the inequalities should not be violated as otherwise you must accept that quantum strangeness prevails. I'm trying to show that violation of the inequalities is not strange, nor is maintenance of entanglement and 'particles' doing the correct thing without being told what to do. There have been some 'stepping stones' getting there.

RE. spooky action at a distance. There is a presumption that information has to be given to the partner particle to ensure it always behaves as it should. Such as going through x orientation of a polarizer, if the first tested particle has gone though that orientation i.e. making the partner into an always goes though x particle. A change of what it is from an uncertain behaviour type of particle.

No such thing is happening. The particles are not being changed from what they are

Why it is an unnecessary presumption: One of the particles will not independently change what it does and so become uncorrelated with its partner unless acted upon by something but not the partner prior to the test. The particle is individually behaving according to the relationship established at the time, and place of its own meeting the polarizer, and given its energy and angular momentum obtained at production of the pair. Conservation applying to each individually maintains their symmetrical relationship and therefore symmetry of behaviour.

http://viXra.org/abs/2211.0138

The entangled particles do not need telling what to be in order to do the correct thing in the circumstances they individually find themselves. Going through a polarizer, lets say polarizer A, is not a characteristic of the photon that can be compared with other identifying characteristics. Has: Hat, gloves and glasses are sometimes used in explaining Bell's inequalities. Going through polarizer A always depends on how it is encountered at the time by the individual without a prior goes through or doesn't go through identity.

Existence is different from a model of it built using received information, To be what it is, existence does not require information from everything around it. It, the pattern of all that exists is at the one and only foundational time, Uni-temporal-Now. What is existentially true at one location in the pattern of existence is true throughout it. It us not a matter of viewpoint or reference frame. There is no need for communication to make it so. So the idea that superluminal communication must be allowed is redundant.

The existing particles have orientation. The individual orientation does not have to be fixed, red glove-like. Any change will be correlated with a change to the partner. Being an entangled pair the orientations and spins are by definition and fact of creation of the pair correlated. They remain correlated unless one is perturbed in a way the other isn't. No communication is needed to maintain correlation. So just by doing what they do they are correlated unless treated differently. What a person knows is different from existence. Existence is independent-ly real of thought processes or information derived product of measurement

Having said 'The existing particles have orientation', I need to qualify that. They really are in a condition whether fixed or changing that is potentially measurable. Measuring involves applying a context that will yield a particular outcome. So measured this way the orientation is x. Measures with a different orientation of measuring apparatus the orientation result is different. This is a kind of relativity. The measurement outcome depends on how you look. That does not mean the condition measured does not exist until measured. It means how that condition is described, the measurement result does not exist before measurement

It could be said this way: the existing particle has a relation to everything else that exists being a part of the pattern of all existing, that might be called it's absolute, unmeasured orientation. That does not need to be static. A measurement related to that orientation is looking at it in one particular, limited way. A measurement produced is a particular characterization, when measured that way. Such as the result of an orientation of polarizer. Same applies yo electrons and Stern Gerlach apparatus orientations.

The challenge continues with different combinations of angles. One door vertical and one door at 45 degrees, which allows one friend to pass with ease and the other faced with an obstacle between easy and difficult that can be successfully passed 50% of the time. (neither of you are very bendy.) 50% of the time there will be failure to get through the 45 degree doorway. There is no certain correlation or lack of correlation, Again no communication is needed to get this result. Each person is just taking on the situation they individually face. However when both doors are at 45 degrees there will be the case that both pass through or both fail without agreement via communication about what result will happen. This is due to both being in the same condition from the outset. For analogy both persons are feeling particularly energetic and Sprite-ly having drank a large cup of coffee 15 minutes before the test. Both will pass the 45 degree test with flying colours. Or alternatively both are feeling weak and tired, deprived of sleep and coffee. This time both will fail the 45 degree test.

It would be easy to have an anti-correlation from the outset, like that found using polarizers. Just by giving one of the human partners coffee and depriving the other. Which doe gets coffee does not matter. It is just a way of showing the creation of a pair of opposite conditions.