Vladimir Rogozhin Hello Vladimir. I was hoping you would read my essay and provide comments. I got my wish. After reading your comments, my answers, and looking at your previous publications, I believe an ongoing discussion would be beneficial for both of us. In this reply, I will just address your comments. In the next reply, I will go into relating and correlating my work with yours - especially your paper on the Crisis of Fundamentality ….
In my essay, if I understand your ground, grounding, and grounded terms correctly, the Cs
"in chaos creating field would be the ground. The conversion of the chaotic Cs into the ordered, original, self-replicator would be the grounding. The resulting self-replicator would be the grounded. This is analogous to the C*s in chaos being the creator, the creating being the conversion and the self-replicator being the created. This process creates and becomes the original, stable, repeating, self-maintaining, space/time/mass processing which in my theory is the “birth” of ontological “being”. This process can be described verbally, mentally followed (drawn) in my mind and described mathematically. This process was introduced in my previous fqxi essay: Clarification of Physics: A Complete, Computable, Predictive Model of our Multiverse. You can access this essay by going to your search engine and typing in: fqxi Clarification of Physics …
In my essay, successful creation creates and uses its own mathematics in its progression to become the physical world. In the development of the successful creation model, I discovered the mathematics in the physical world and developed a successful creation mathematical model. This mathematical model “maps to” the scientific, empirically derived, generally accepted, physical descriptions of the range of change from the constants of Plank actions, to atomic structures, stars, solar systems, galaxies, the visible universe, etc. The success of this mapping provides knowledge about the physical universe and its relationships with mathematics. I believe this provides evidence for the correlations of math and physics.
Note: I introduced the successful creation, mathematical, physical mapping in the same fqxi essay previously mentioned. In the paper I provided some correlations that may be of interest to you.
- In my theory, the model is the overall description that includes the creation and functioning of all of the order in existence. Algorithms are useful tools in that description.
When I read your comments, I looked up some of your previous papers and selected your January 4th 2018 paper on Crisis of fundamentality … What I did when I read your paper was to put everything in terms of successful creation and also substituted some of my terms in your paper. From my point of view, successful creation “fits” into your paper very well. In my next posting, I will describe some of the important correlations. You will hear from me soon. Best Regards -FlaxTern