Alan Kadin At the moment I only know your essay to the extent of Chat GPT's review. But judging from that its defiantly an essay I'll be happy to read. So I'll do so and return to you with comment.
I was unaware the separation of QM and Relativity might be a legacy of the 1930's Nazi party. I love science history and I have a personal interest in the intersection between these fundamental sciences, so yes, I'm your target audience. That such a historical influence could have such a lasting legacy speaks towards some kind of failure in the science process. I'll be interested in your conclusion on this. Is science overly ruled by tradition and doctrine?
Yes, the intersection between our fundamental theories, QM and Relativity. I'll be interested to know your approach. I have views on this myself, and I'll just make a quick observational point.
As for General Relativity, non of its verifiable measures are performed on space itself. Rather, the measurements are all directed towards matter and only then inferred as relating to coordinates in space. The empirical aspects of Relativity are all properties of matter, which means all empirical aspects of relativity are QM in nature. For example, time dilation is nothing more or less than an account of atomic activity, and atomic activity is a QM property, Photons and Gluons for example. Wasnt the point of fundamental forces to explain the origin of all processes? Let me put it like this. If every aspect of Relativity Theory needs to be inferred through the lens of atomic properties, then why cant scientists work out how Relativity relates to matter, and QM? They are conceptually intersected by necessity. Having said this, I do understand why science is hung up on these issues, however there are some obvious avenues for inquiry which I find amazing that they have not been explored.
Ok, what of Lorentz transformations then? Again, length contraction is a structural consideration of matter/atoms, and also a distance traveled by objects, and it is Photons and Gluons for example that manage atomic structure. So it can be said that origin of length contraction points to the same property of matter implicated in the process of time dilation, that is to say, variable atomic activity. Both point to and are implicated with atomic forces or fundamental forces. Gluons and Photons. And Gluon's and Photons are QM of nature.
An analogy. A car demonstrates the relationship between force, activity levels and distance/length. The car engine issues force, which generates the cars activity level, which equates to the distance traveled down the road. I know this sounds ridiculously simple to suggest that this analogy provides a guide to how to unify Relativity and QM, but in fact I can provide many more reasons why this is the correct context. My essay hints at some of them.