Oliver Wang
A very important and interesting essay with ideas aimed at overcoming the conceptual-paradigm crisis in the metaphysical/ontological basis of knowledge.
I fully agree with these conclusions.
<<First, the new scientific theory must be an integral part of a larger philosophical theory in which there is no longer an impassable gulf between metaphysics and science. Moreover, if we are to save the civilization from the rampant proliferation of empiricism, materialism, and objectivism, then metaphysics should be the basis of science, not the other way around, as it was in the postRenaissance scientific revolution. Secondly, this theoretical framework must include an awareness of its own limit. Dualistic logic is based on sensory mechanism, so it is related to cognition and easily quantifiable. However, quantifiable perceptions are only peripheral to life.
Language is a part of logic, and hence is susceptible to the limit of logic. Thus, this theoretical framework must show us a path to spiritual elevation of individual life beyond language and logic. Thirdly, this metaphysical framework should have theoretical completeness and holistic coherence. It means that, as epistemology, it must find a position that transcends faith system and knowledge system in order to ensure self-consistency and coherence of the theory. As a metaphysical theory, there in principle should not be any existence that cannot be explained in the framework. As a theory of values, it has to contain both ontology and a rational account of the cognitive infinity of life. As a natural philosophy, it must provide a legitimate place in the theory for humanity, or more generally, life. That is, it is to account for not only the existence of the noumenon, but also the existence of life as the observer. Fourthly, as a complete philosophical theory, it must contain an explanation of the cycle of life as well as an explanation of time and space, so that questions about the meaning of life can be resolved once and for all. As such, it also provides an explanation of the origin of the universe that is consistent with its epistemology, metaphysics, values, and astronomical observations. In light of its insight to the nature of life, it should even include a general view of society.>>
Have you ever dealt with the problem of the ontological justification /substantiation of mathematics (ontological basification), and hence knowledge in general?
See A. Zenkin's article "SCIENTIFIC COUNTER-REVOLUTION IN MATHEMATICS"
[http://www.ccas.ru/alexzen/papers/ng-02/contr_rev.htm]
He concludes: "the truth should be drawn..."
Have you tried "draw the truth"?
Fully agree with your conclusion:
<<Cosmology, in my opinion, should be the place where the effort to integrate science and humanity is most promising, and hence the first battlefield of this scientific revolution.>>
Fields Prize winner Vladimir Voevodsky (1966-2017):
"What we now call the crisis of Russian science is not only a crisis of Russian science. There is a crisis of world science. Real progress will consist in a very serious fight between science and religion, which will end with their association."
[http://baaltii1.livejournal.com/198675.html]
I think that the main "serious fight" will be here: Meta-Axiom "In the Beginning was the Logos…/ Ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὁ λόγος..." VS. Hypothesis "In the Beginning was the "Big bang..."
"Logos" - MetaLAW that governs the Universe (in the spirit of Heraclitus).
Reliance in the construction / creation of the ontological framework, carcass and foundation of knowledge should be / can only be on the metacategory "Logos", Meta-Axiom and the super principle of trinity. Plus a new understanding of matter: Matter is that from which all meanings, forms and structures are born.
In your model of the World there is a so-called. "Big Bang"?
Have you read this letter?
[http://cosmology.info/media/open-letter-on-cosmology.html]
A very important conclusion:
<<At this particular time, we need to find more humanistic and philosophical meaning in science, so that it can lead humanity out of the current social and civilizational dilemma.>>