Classical physics of Newton and Maxwell have been serving us continuously and quantitatively since the beginning within their defined domains, without any major controversies. In contrast, the highly mathematical Relativity, Quantum Mechanics and Modern Astrophysics, while advancing our knowledge of the universe, have consistently remained controversial, from their respective beginnings, in many aspects of their interpretations. Persistent controversies imply some structural problems in our constructions of the mathematical theories and the interpretations (physical meaning) of the individual mathematical terms and the mathematical operators in the equations. We are proposing a paradigm shift in our conceptual approach to modeling the evolutionary processes of the cosmic system as creative system engineers. Because we see that every living species, single or multicellular, is surviving and thriving as creative system engineers. Every cell is constantly executing innumerable quantum chemical engineering functions. Some also build safe-abodes as skillful engineers. All these engineering actions must conform to the engineering rules allowed by nature. Therefore, our successful evolution depends upon our understanding and applying the rules (laws) of natures as living skillful engineers. Hence, we should re-organize our mode of structuring the working theories (mathematical equations) and interpret them as engineers, and not as creative mathematicians. Our minds should not be limited to appreciating the elegance of the working equations. We should try to connect each algebraic math-term of the equations with the real physical property of the natural entity being modeled. Each mathematical operator between the math-terms are executing some nature-allowed interaction. This leads to real physical transformations through energy exchange. In properly designed instruments, such physical transformations generate the data and validate the proposed theory. Thus, successful theories are enhanced further and becomes accessible to engineers. Science will be different: down to the ground, out of the ivory-tower, more accessible to everybody.
FOREVER CHALLENGED: MODELING COSMIC PROCESSSES
Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri
A very strong, critical and deep essay with ideas that give impetus to the mind to joint action for the benefit of all Humanity. Congratulations!
Very important conclusions for finding a way to overcome the modern conceptual - paradigmatic crisis of the metaphysical/ontological basis of fundamental science:
"Nature is dialectical."
"Consequently, all cultures, all ways of thinking (spiritual, philosophical, scientific, engineering, etc.) will eventually have to converge in order to become an integrated or coherent system of knowledge."
“If we do not develop all human capabilities, i.e. all human capitals, human society cannot develop to its full potential. However, physics is now essentially a “monoculture”, supported by the global knowledge gatekeepers of the economic enterprise of science. This monoculture , in fact, a more serious form of prejudice in physics than the social prejudice that is popular in socio-political movements for corrections. But the scientific monoculture steadfastly preserves the "purity science”, developed over the past 120 years. It's time for a paradigm shift."
"Therefore, the future unification of theories must start from the bottom."
(Reverse translation with Google translator)
But I believe this is an existentially dangerous idea:
"However, eventually we will have to find our homes in other planets around other stars as the Solar Warming starts engulfing all of our planets, starting probably within a couple of billion years, before its ultimate demise in another couple of more billions of years. "
Hi,
Great essay, identifying key problems and with a sound central idea for their resolution. I agree the practical 'engineering' approach may be a good route to the overdue paradigm shift. I also think you'll like my own essay consistent with that approach but using physics subliminally suggested by what I assume is an alien intelligence, or perhaps even memories from a past life! But what matters is the escape from the 'increasing ignorance' you rightly cite, giving accessible physics, so far unfalsifiable! It seems you're also spot on about 'modelling cosmic processes'. I liked it all and have no questions! Very well done.
Dandelion Sailfish wrote: “We have become the master of the biosphere, but we have been failing to evolve and accept the responsibility of the biosphere.”
Maybe a universal consciousness is constructing purposeful evolution here on Earth and we are failing to accept our responsibility in it because we are still in our infancy. We better grow up fast or another mass extinction could be coming our way!
sl Well said!!... insightful and highly relevant
sl My comments are intended to augment your reasoning, and/or give impetus to a direction for the forward thinking this essay advocates.
1.1. "Diverse thinking models in knowledge development, which are triggered by our intentions & influenced by our subjective cultures.
"...understanding the objective reality, ..."
sl It has become apparent that the current state of language is imposing conundrums to a degree that "scientist tend to talk around each other".
sl Objective as being associated with an entity that occupys space... or an observable occupant of space?
sl Subjective as being associated with an entity that does not occupy space... or an unobservable occupant of space?
sl And before we can address these questions, we must resolve "What is space?
Ref. "Physical Space and Physical Time:What are they?"- D. Oriti
(
sl What constitutes mind?
"... many top physicists have been writing that the observable universe is our illusion!"
sl Many credentialed physicist are theorizing "multi universes" without verifying a fundamental knowledge of "Universe"... i.e. what then do we call the set of all universes?
"... explain the engineering processes behind all the observable physical transformations..."
sl An engineer cannot explain the transformations of a process without knowledge of the function of each element... i.e. logic component... dictating the process.
"...appropriate technology development for our real deep space journey has not started."
sl "Appropriate" technological development for a "deep space journey" is contingent on a quantum model that differentiates the element "space"... i.e as a logic component... from an element of other than "space".
"Our early introspective forefathers started from a platform of zero knowledge to understand the laws that are behind the engineering processes guiding all the natural physical changes."
sl Fact exist before knowledge... i.e. we discover certain principles, apply those principles, monitor the results, and from these results we formulate knowledge.
"... assure the convergence of the diverse subjective human concepts (theories)..."
sl Convergence of concepts requires verifiable means of conceptual conveyance, and human linguistics as a reliable means of collaborating, is being destabilized by employing sensationalisms to promote media marketing... e g. the God particle.
"We have yet to figure out the ultimate truth about our universe – its meaning, its purpose and the role of humans in it. Collectively, we are still the Buddha’s “born blind men”, persistently, iteratively trying to visualize the Cosmic Elephant."
sl What may appear to "blind men" as "collective" discernment, is often a marketed commodity... i.e. mainstream media hype.
1.2." Identifying the diversity of conceptual approaches:
"... the postulate of one benevolent creator-theory."
sl Does a postulate of a Big Bang warrant greater credibility than a postulate of a "one benevolent creator-theory"?
sl If Spirit is defined in terms of a minimum/indivisible unit of spatially defined Energy (QE), and space is objectified in one's quantum model, then a single point source of QE is a more logical emergence concept than a Big Bang.
Ref: "Digital Science: Emergence of Quantum Consciousness"
http://uqsmatrixmechanix.com/2023FQXiEssay4pdfconv.php
"... understand how nature works as a materialistic system."
sl If 'material" is not objectionable in one's quantum model, media spin will decay conveyance of the concept.
"... continuing to use human-mental logics to directly grasp the cosmic logics..."
sl Is experience a dictate of "human- mental" logics"?
"... validate them by demonstrating reproducible experiments."
sl If experience is a dictate of "human- mental logics", does reproducible experience qualify as scientific experiment?
"... postulates for each separate theory that models a particular set of observables..."
sl In that observables are derivatives of perturbation analysis, math-logics may well formulate theory, but can not prove process.
"... preserve and leverage the strength of math-logics..."
sl Utilizing mythologies scientist can verify a non-perturbative analysis environment, but effective application requires foregoing exclusive dependency on measurable/observable elements of process.
"However, the common people have always been at the foundation of our sustainable evolution."
sl Application verifies theory.
"... intelligent engineers, always inventing better ways...
sl Application of reproducible processes that are not EBS compliant, are exposing the limitations of the current state of math-logics.
1.3." What is missing?"
"... undermining attempts to visualize the invisible interaction processes..."
sl "Drawing is a very useful tool against the uncertainty of words"" - Leibniz."
Ref: A. Zenkin "SCIENTIFIC COUNTER-REVOLUTION IN MATHEMATICS
(http://www.ccas.ru/alexzen/papers/ng-02/contr_rev.htm)
"... emulate nature’s practical engineering processes."
sl The underlying elements of process may not be measurable in observable units... i e. a theoretical minimum/indivisible unit of space (QI) will be required.
"...surviving and thriving by intelligently executing innumerable quantum-chemistry-driven interactions..."
sl Survival is contingent upon compliance to fundamental processes.
1.4. "What is confusing?"
"... interactions are “entangled” (guided) by some force of interaction..."
sl Force requires a momentum mechanism and a Substance that experiences motion... e g. a pulsed single source of QE.... and Substance interactions are dictated by the Structure of the environment designed for their dynamics... e g. a geometry quantization that objectifies a minimum/indivisible unit of "space" (QE).
"... interactions between different entities..."
sl Any credible conceptualization of isolated entities and their boundary mechanix, as a manifestation of the underlying fundamental process, requires a non-perturbative analysis of a bottom line fundamental process.
Ref: 2023 FQXi Essay: Proposal for an ontological view of the Universe.
https://forums.fqxi.org/d/3933/9
"... humans to accelerate our own evolution..."
sl A human, as a Structural configuration of Substance, can only evolve in accord with the spontaneous harmonious resolve of Substance distribution within the Structural dictates of the entire system, over time ... i.e. entity evolution is not exclusively a consequence of entity boundary mechanix.
"... did not have any knowledge of math or science..."
sl In regard to survival as being contingent upon compliance to fundamental processes, lack of abstract knowledge may have been an advantage... i.e. as you mention above, "over emphasis on the human invented math-logics can undermine visualization of the invisible interaction processes"... and thus inhibit their application.
"Yet, we are here today because of their innovative engineering minds and patiently perfecting the trial-and-error technique."
sl If "engineering" implys the capacity to plan, "engineering minds" are not exclusively human, nor is the necessity to perfect trail-and-erro technique.
"These visualizations became possible only after..."
sl A model that objectifies energy as Substance rather than phenomenon, facilitates enhanced visualization, and thereby expands range of application.
Ref: "Digital Science: Emergence of Quantum Consciousness"
(http://uqsmatrixmechanix.com/2023FQXiEssay4pdfconv.php)
"... we still cannot decisively model and describe what electrons and photon exactly are!"
sl A non-perturbative model that objectifies energy as QE, within (QI); facilitates an environment in which the Mechanic of electrons and photons can be analyzed as choreographies of QE, which enhances visualization, and in turn perpetrates applications.
2."RESPONDING TO THE FOUR QUESTIONS SET BY THE ORGANIZERS"
2.1."-Q1. To what degree is the science we have today necessarily the way it is versus contingent on the particular history and human societies in which it originated?"
"... current state of science-thinking..."
sl Fact precedes knowledge, and if the individual's inquiry is being addressed to a collective which the individual cannot hold responsible for the consequences associated with the current state of scientific... or...philosophical thinking, may the individual be well advised to explore the fundamental Fact from which the collective derives its knowledge.
"Today’s evolved state of knowledge of the universal laws of nature (Physics)..."
sl In that the collective's evolved state of Physics has failed to inspire applications relevant to the resolve of human condition... e g. the star - trek replicator, self healing, and social stability... individuals are being pragmatically driven to explore alternatives, and the individual's model of fundamental process... i e "why it is what it is"... by which one derives knowledge, is becoming more diverse and less culture specific.
2.2."-Q2. What could a science free of prejudice and bigotry have looked like?"
"... analyze the diverse globally “matured” cultures of today..."
sl In an unprecedented manner, prejudice and bigotry are currently being exposed by global social media, which is motivating the individual to accept responsibility for verifying the credentials of one's knowledge source, which in my opinion is not a bad thing.
"... has been working at every level of human social evolution..."
sl As does the current mainstream media credentialed "scientific-thinking".
"... promoting diversity and equity."
sl In that mainstream media is a marketed commodity, "equity" as a measurable parameter of collective social -thinking is biased by economics, and attempting to assign responsibility for the consequences of media hyped agenda, is akin to sweeping smoke.
"...economic enterprise of the sciences."
sl In that mainstream media solicitations for "Scientific" content are click bait driven ... e.g. the "God Particle ... sensationalism has become an economic enterprises of science.
"But, the scientific mono-culture is steadfastly preserving the “purity of science” developed over the last 120 years. A paradigm shift is overdue."
sl A mono-culture that promotes abstraction for lack of objectivity... e g. will isolate itself, and undermine any credibility with regard to application of its theories to the human condition.
sl To assert that every black hole generates a unique universe, may conceptually expand our understanding of emergence iteration processes, but may also generate another Physical/Meta-physical conundrum...i.e. analysis is still perturbation in regard to the set of all Universes... and conceptually many physicists have not completely breached Planck's reef.
"... even though these theories cannot provide direct guidance about the engineering functions in the domains of quantum physics."
sl Fundamental Logic Components emerge from analysis of single point QE emission in a non-perturbative geometry framework, which provide the engineer functions to investigate subsequent mechanic of the Quantum Domain, and their application to the human condition.
Ref: "Digital Science: Emergence of Quantum Consciousness"
http://uqsmatrixmechanix.com/2023FQXiEssay4pdfconv.php
"... we do not see the normal and historical Kuhn’s [12] paradigm shift taking any root."
sl As evidenced by the FQXi 2023 Essay solicitation, a "paradigm shift" is occurring, albeit slowly, within the "scientific mono culture" and your essay provides significant momentum to accelerate forward motion.
2.3 "-Q3. What can it look like in the future?"
"... “individual freedom first”, and its egotistic derivative..."
sl The "I Am"'s freedom to access fundamental knowledge and act upon it, does not imply unwarranted dominance... i.e. cosmic intelligence inherently prioritizes the wellbeing of the universal collective... and ego as conditioned response, when sub servant to the "I Am" 's expression of cosmic intelligence, is apparently a universally engineered mechanism of individual human circuit functionality.
"A few brilliant individuals cannot survive, if the biosphere cannot anymore support the diversity of lives."
sl A "genius" of merit should be able to sustain independent research... i.e. unbiased by funding source... on the basis of the logic model he/she is investigating... i.e. funded fundamental research is somewhat of an oxymoron.
"... best methods for assured sustainability..."
sl In that a non-perturbative model is the best method to verify accord with fundamental processes, the collective needs to resolve a verifiably non-biased criteria for "best" minimum/indivisible unit of spatial quantization. I see that emerging, and it is further evidence the paradigm is shifting.
Ref: UQS evaluation of the TETRAHEDRON as the theoretical unit of spacial quantization.
(http://uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQSDOriti.php)
"... a new mode of evolution, that I would call, “Consciously constructing purposeful evolution” (CCPE)"
sl A "best" model criteria must dictate a requirement that the model facilitate logic functions from which quantum consciousness inherently emerges... i.e. consciousness should not be an abstraction.... which will fertilize the ground for CCPE.
"... without the need for any revolution."
sl Evolution not revolution will require a structural change in human consciousness which facilitates an objectifiable procedural to query cosmic consciousness, be installed on each individual of the collective, and a "best" model should facilitate this.
"Human mental volition accelerated the evolution of human consciousness and the human intellect."
sl It may require individuals that have a cosmic consciousness query app installed on their mental desktops, to continue to accelerate the evolution of human consciousness and the human intellect, and they should be free from constraints of scientific and philosophical prejudice to do so.
""Individual responsibility” to the collective wellbeing..."
sl Any proxy/representative determination of "collective wellbeing" is inherently biased, and any unbiased determination of "collective wellbeing" requires individual responsibility for maintaining open access to collective intelligence from which the determination is made.
"... recognizing the necessary diversity of intelligences."
sl In that knowledge is derived directly from expression of fundamental Fact, diversity of intelligences can be sustained within a collective intelligence if the fundamental Fact is common to all members of the collective, and there in the paradigm shift hinges on a model that can facilitate a bottom line Fact.
sl Given human potential as "purposeful", and evolving human potential as contingent upon enhanced application of the quantum functions to the human condition , an evolved Q-model is essential to engineering the evolution construction process.
sl A consciously engineered digital/virtual environment will be required to convey a Q-model that facilitates collective consensus of a cohesive fundamental Fact.
sl "... truth should be drawn with the help of the cognitive computer visualization technology and should be presented to an unlimited circle" of spectators in the form of color-musical cognitive images of its immanent essence (see http://www.com2com.ru/alexzen). If it is really the Truth, and if my neighbor is not a color-blind person, we (and all other people around) shall see the same."
Ref: A. Zenkin "SCIENTIFIC COUNTER-REVOLUTION IN MATHEMATICS")
(http://www.ccas.ru/alexzen/papers/ng-02/contr_rev.htm))
2.4 "-Q4. And how could the process of science be better?"
"... ignoring some foundational limits of EBS."
sl A frame by frame analysis of a CAD SIMulated process, will expose a broken kinematic logic chain far more readily than will an analysis of process as symbolic expression... i.e. equations.
2.4.2. Lack of uniqueness of the postulates
"... start from a platform of zero knowledge, ..."
sl Given (0,0,0) as the zero platform from which QE are emitted and distributed as occupants of QI... i.e. QI as defined by the specified spacial geometry quantization encapsulating (0,0,0)... logic inherently emerges ... i.e. knowledge is derived directly from the expression of the fundamental Fact.
Ref: 2023 FQXi Essay "Science in Search of Neutral Ground"
(https://s3.amazonaws.com/fqxi.data/data/essay-contest-files/16/essay_id_2251.pdf)
"... postulates that seem to logically connect them together."
sl Specifying a non-perturbative infinitely expandable, unified unit quantization facilitates an unbroken kinematic logic chain from fundamental Fact to phenomena... i.e. eliminates "seem to".
"... postulates are intelligent guesses; they cannot be proven directly."
sl Working from the specific...i.e. fundamental Fact... to the general, eliminates necessity for "intelligent guesses"... i.e. either logic emerges to resolve next, or the process halts.
"... future theory unification should start at the bottom."
sl Specifying a non-perturbative infinitely expandable, unified unit quantization facilitates a scale invariant logic framework into which scientist of all disciplines could seamlessly mesh their measurements as perceptions of environment, and therein establish a "theory of everything".
Ref: "Digital Science: Emergence of Quantum Consciousness"
(http://uqsmatrixmechanix.com/2023FQXiEssay4pdfconv.php)
"... an emergent system out of simple to more and more complex systems, most likely, would not yield to a Theory of Everything (TOE)."
sl If all Space-Time Energy entities, as occupants of a static spacial framework quantized by a unified minimum/indivisible quanta (QI), are composite choreographies of a spatially defined unified minimum/indivisible quanta of Energy (QE), then entity QE spin interactions generate inferred logic, which inherently facilitates greater processing efficiency, to resolve the increasingly complex dynamics of QE/QI distribution over time... i.e. complexity is not solely a consequence of system component iteration.
sl As additional evidence that the "paradigm" is shifting, the base unit geometry of the framework quantization is currently being investigated.
Ref: UQS evaluation of the TETRAHEDRON as the theoretical unit of spacial quantization.
(http://uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQSDOriti.php)
2.4.3." Incompleteness of mathematical theories"
"... axioms are the foundation of all mathematical theories. Axioms are very wise guesses, but unprovable."
sl A geometry framework as the logic structure in which to evaluate "wise guesses"is not a theory... i e. it is a conceptual tool.
2.4.4. "Incompleteness of gathered data"
"... theory validating data emerges as a number in our smartly designed instruments due to the quantity of energy exchanged between a pair of detector and detectee, chosen to validate the specific force of interaction between them..
sl A number that represents a measurement of the specific force of interaction between detector and detected... i.e. quantity of phenomenal energy in an observable event... is not the number of QE participants in the event.
"... knowledge keeps advancing iteratively..."
sl Iteration of knowledge that is not derived from Fact, obscures Fact.
2.4.5. "Persistent difficulty in our direct visualization of the live interaction processes in the micro universe."
"... We cannot directly visualize the details of the invisible interaction processes in nature..."
sl A CAD SIMulation of QE emergence, would enhance visualization of QE spin interactions.
Ref: A. Zen kin "SCIENTIFIC COUNTER-REVOLUTION IN MATHEMATICS")
(http://www.ccas.ru/alexzen/papers/ng-02/contr_rev.htm)
"... driven by the same basic functional principle of “dust to dust”."
sl Dust, cosmological or earthly, as a composite of QE, can decay as a consequence of QE spin mechanix, but an evolving understanding of QE dynamics warrant investigation of fundamental processes that facilitate an entity's willful interaction with QE resolve, to sustain the stability of the individual entity QE choreography... e.g. self healing.
"... developing visual models for every step of these dust-to-dust transformations."
sl In that dust is composited QE choreographies, to develop visual models for "dust-to-dust" transformations, will require visualization of QE scale spin mechanix.
"... formulated based upon insufficient knowledge of the existing universe."
sl To model nature as a system engineer... i.e. networked intelligence... requires knowledge of the fundamental processes available to be engineered by nature, and CAD SIMulated emergence models currently offer the most detailed visualization available to the human engineer, to conceptualize QE scale mechanix.
2.4.6." Putting everything together; implementing the paradigm shift"
"... interpretations of the EBS data using the variable and subjective human Mental Logics."
sl Abstraction is justifiable only after the facts to be abstracted are exposed.
"... diffractively evolving while propagating through air, cannot be carried out by a single stable and fixed-energy entity."
sl Can the mathematics being used to investigate Young's double split experiment, model a QE within a QI environment?
"... current state of technology does not yet allow us any operational access to manipulate the amplitude of an imagined “energy bullet photon”."
sl In that a Radiation and an Inertia channel are inherent in utilization of the Quadhedron as the base volumetric unit of quantization, it may be possible to emulate the Young Experiment setup within a fully functional virtual quantum lab... i.e. Quadhedron quantized CAD environment... and utilize the Radiation Channel entity spin choreography, manifest on the Pulse-20-Close of the momentum mechanism, as a “energy bullet photon” to SIMulate the path taken.
"... the quantum of energy for the release being provided by EM waves..."
sl A "quantum of energy" as a spatially defined minimum/indivisible unit (QE)?... or a number output from an event monitoring device?
Ref: (http://www.matrixmechanix.com/UQSETermDys.php)
sl Would two colliding photons, exhibiting opposing QE spin configurations, float a sodium ion??
Ref: Nick Vamivakas and Levi Neukirch 07/2013 University of Rochester Laser Experiment
(http://www.matrixmechanix.com/MNVPHOTONPRESSURE.php)
"... visualize the physical process executed by the detectors to generate the data."
sl In that "physical" implies spatial occupancy, a model that objectifies... i.e. spatially defines... a minimum/indivisible Quanta of Energy (QE) will enhance CAD SIM analysis of the process.
"CONSCIOUSLY CONSTRUCTING PURPOSEFUL EVOLUTION"
"... failing to evolve consciously [13, 14] and collectively..."
sl In that a long and increasingly prevalent reliance on mainstream media to make a proxy interpretation of the "collective" mindset, the individual feels absolved of responsibility for the failures of "collective" judgement to sustain a biosphere conducive to life, liberty and happiness, and a "paradigm shift" that necessitates individual responsibility for verifying the credentials... i.e. Fact basis... of one's knowledge source, will be constrained by individual inability to relinquish one's false sense of self-righteousness.
sl In that this essay establishes the necessity to resolve the underlying mechanisms of observed process, as a critical element in restoring scientific credibility, I would rate it a 10, but FQXi rejected my 2023 Essay http://uqsmatrixmechanix.com/2023FQXiEssay4pdfconv.php as being an ""alternative "theory of everything," not an essay about how science could be different.", so I have no vote.
sl Thank you for verifying the necessity and establishing procedurals for change, that justify my more than 30 years of independent research, and for your knowledgeable contribution of momentum to implement a structural change in human consciousness.
S. Lingo
UQS Author/Logician
(http:www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com)
"The first invention was the generation of fire on demand"
But we still here in this point. All what direct our politicians in science is to manage fire and to get more power.
Of course we need a paradigm shift but how?: with new ideas but new ideas are not discussed largely. Always money gouvern publications, there is a few gold publications and this not enought to discover new ideas.
We have certainly been masters of the biosphere but have failed any nurture. In my essay, "Global Externalities and a new science, I did not capsulize as biosphere but same message. And certainly science is not free of prejudice and bigotry, imposed by corporate control and by biases among scientists. Good analysis of what ails us and what can be better as the contest proposes. A good rating in the short time we have.
Vladimir Rogozhin
Many thanks for your comments!
How is this an existentially dangerous idea?
I am very much interested in understanding. Correct ideas could be dangerous, because it could disrupt the prevailing mode "social order". We just need to move step by step. Because, I am not in favor of "Revolution". I strongly recommend "consciously constructing purposeful evolution" as I have underscored within the essay.
James Hoover
Thank you Apricot for your comments.
Alaya Kouki
Yes, HakiHeron, you are correct about the prevailing dominance of "CONSUMING & CONTROLLING" culture. However, as this massive number of essays demonstrate, we have plenty of forward thinking people we will be able to trigger the shift, step by step. Just do your part, as best as you can.