interesting, Eckard Blumschein
if you can explain all the content to a deaf person, i subscribe to your ideas
if you complain that there is to much being taught why not improve your teaching method such that the the information content transmitted is increased (for various qualities)
Lazy tools for visual and acoustic communication, advertizing videos and AI will
worsen the situation for students and their teacher.
yes i agree that the tools, might promote unidirectional passive listening monologues
the key is dialogue , however, how ? because this is getting in to hybridization of language, chimerisation/ (cyborgification)
with (tech) tools ,
maybe what is lacking is clear schemes (with) clear goals)for developing of the new languages
goals can span various time length- short term or medium medium a little more, and extremely far in to the future goals
i believe humans should evolve in to new species that communicate high volume of information via various modes
in societies that look completely different from today's world
No Standstill in Fundamental Science
this is in an aggravating, negative, tone , this might help teach good balance
i think there is a lot of room to find new interesting things in what you called fundamental science with a couple of examples (cantor, bourbaki) ,personally if have the right conditions i would research, explore this field
for example
This fundamental dilemma in mathematics can only be avoided when any ideal
point in the line IR is no longer understood as it usually was. i.e., like a pixel that
has shrunk to infinitely small size.
defining a point to be something
that is +zoomed it five time -enlarged three times+ zoomed again two times (a little to the left)- enlarged four times (slightly above right) and than finally + zoomed it one more time time might lead to interesting geometries with new applicable properties .
presumably people in the last decades have been thought more or less the same ( same defining terminology, exercises etc) trying to raise consistency educational constructions with less intuitive principles it is now desired in my opinion, this things/ axiom seems absurd , does not make sense - but lets try harder to see where does it leads if it can be made in to something.to set up the goal of playing with structures for the sake of it