- Edited
Lorraine Ford
To rewrite the above tangle of words (!):
People can’t seem to quite believe that non-human life could be bona fide conscious, or that pre-life (particles, atoms, and molecules), could be bona fide conscious (where pre-life consciousness would seemingly be basic consciousness of self and one’s surroundings).
I guess one of the main problems, when looking at the issue of consciousness, is human hubris and human belief in their own exceptionalism: people seem to believe that the only bona fide consciousness is human consciousness.
While bona fide higher-level matter is made up of bona fide lower-level matter, somehow higher-level consciousness is not thought to be similarly made up of lower-level parts.
But the foundation, upon which higher-level conscious information about self and the world is built, can only be lower-level information that can only be possessed by particles, atoms, and molecules that are conscious of their own categories, relationships and numbers.
However, none of this can be measured, only the physical correlates of consciousness can potentially be measured, so methods other than measurement need to be employed to understand consciousness. Methods like systems analysis. But not philosophy.
There is no useless baggage: consciousness only exists because it is necessary; consciousness is a necessary part of the functioning of the real-world system.