The proposed talks listed are:
- Carlo Rovelli, Half Way Through the Woods: The 2OTH Century Scientific Revolution and Its Incompleteness
- Michel Broué, Local Approach to Finite Groups
- Terence Tao, Recent Developments in Analytic Prime Number Theory
But isn’t the “Incompleteness” of the “The 2OTH Century Scientific Revolution”, and 21ST century science, at least partly due to the fact that physicists and mathematicians have tacitly assumed that a mathematical system would automatically know itself (e.g. its own categories, relationships and numbers), and that a mathematical system would automatically move itself (i.e. move its own numbers)?
It doesn’t matter what the equations are, or what the Finite Groups are, or what the Prime Numbers are. All the equations, groups, and numbers in the world are not sufficient to symbolically represent the missing special features that a system requires in order to be a viable moving real-world system.
No amount of equations, groups, or numbers will ever be sufficient to represent a viable moving real-world system.
When are physicists and mathematicians going to start looking at what is missing?
