• [deleted]

continuation of Lipp - The Coney Island Green Theory.

Further to the Coney Island Green Theory, here is it's solution to the Horizon Problem:

NAME: The Coney Island Green Theory

Author & Date: Douglas W. Lipp 1978-2010 and Beyond!

Classification: Relativistic-based Time Inspired Expansion/Contraction Theory

REMARKS: Describes both expansion of mass to space(MT=S)and contraction of space into a black hole (S/T=M), where M=Matter, S=Space and T=Time, and through a mathematical quantification manifestation; Combines the spacetime continuum with the mass-energy equation; offers solutions to Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Horizon Problem, and Red Shift Anomalies. Separately, the theory offers an explanation of motion, and includes an interesting Fourth Law of Motion. Also explains the physical reality behind why E=mc2. Very Important: CIG is experimentally verifiable.

Quick note: I think I've figured out the Horizon Probem Solution. (you need to understand CIG Theory first)

Regarding the Horizon Problem: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horizon_problem

If the very nature of light (matter) , per MT =S, always manifests itself according to its intrinsic values [To variations of Space (dark matter, dark energy, etc.), based on rate (c or percentages thereof) - and according to CIG Theory, of course], then, even though the distinct opposite ends of the Universe cannot logically correspond (talk) to one another due to their distances exceeding the limts of time, there shall still be an exact match of their temperature.

In fact, CIG Theory demands this. CIG Theory offers a reason why the universe is in fact extremely homogeneous. It is based on the very nature of the manisfestation of mass to space. At pure space (the darkest of dark energy), temperatures are identical, and there is no need for communication between two horizons. Each separate side of the Universe is following the same CIG transformation (mathematically no different from the other when mass travels at an identical rate), so of course they will be at the same temperature.

The Horizon Problem states, in part "This presents a serious problem; if the universe had started with even slightly different temperatures in different areas, then there would simply be no way it could have evened itself out to a common temperature by this point in time." The temperatures are a direct result of the mass to space transformation process. There is no need to "even" anything out. It is inherent to the CIG process.

CIG Theory requires it be, because at the rate "C", any entity will manifest itself into the identical Space, no matter what side of the Universe that entity is on. Therefore, they will be at the exact same temperature. This is the nature of CIG Theory. The same Dark Matter on one horizon will be at the exact same temperature as the same Dark Matter on the opposite Horizon, as its calculations (transformations) are one and the same. At least according to CIG.

CIG Theory appears to allow for a coherent explanation of the Horizon Problem. In fact, to the CIG Theory, it is no problem at all, since CIG would expect that the universe be formed with precisely the same properties everywhere (space for space, dark matter for dark matter, i.e. - the same transformation is only comparable to its like transformation - you cannot compare the temperature of dark matter with dark energy - here the dark matter will be hotter)(by the very nature of the manisfestation itself- the transformation of matter to space). It could also have formed decidedly slower, without an inflationary aspect having to "freeze" in these properties. The properties are inherent to the CIG transformation.

An analogy:

If you bake some bread on one side of the Universe, and you bake some bread on the other side of the Universe, and they taste the same, did the loaves have to talk to each other? CIG Theory says no, because in CIG, we are baking the bread. Current theory says how can the ingredients taste the same, they must be talking to one another (but they can't, because they exceed the limits of time). Current Theory forgot to bake the bread!

Just a few thoughts on the Horizon Problem. Please make every effort to understand CIG Theory in this regard.

Remember, Where there is a different time there must be a different place. Where there is a different place, there is a different space. Where there are different spaces, there are different volumes. CIG theory explains the creation of new volumes of space created as the result of different times imparted onto the world universe and as a direct result of the relativistic nature of nature arising from diffrent rates of traveling massive particles. These rates are limited by "c", and are often simply a percentage of "c". The Michelson-Morley, Lorentz, Einstein work should appear apparent in CIG, at least to those that have a Wikipedia knowledge of them. It also appears justifiable that Bohr orbitals, Planck, and quantum theory have some common ground within CIG, especially where the newly formed discrete orbits that are created can be considered new space, in accordance with MT=S. The accumulated new space adds up to an expanding Universe. The expansion explains the Red Shift (historically, it was the Red Shift data that preceded the concept of expansion - then, following the expansion in reverse, to the concept of the Big Bang).

Please continue to the Theory on separately posted comments.

Thank you,

Douglas W Lipp

23 days later
  • [deleted]

In context with all the other stuff that has been posted as regards Coney Island Green, and in order to further document CIG Theory, here is CIG's interpretation of the double slit experiment:

Concerning CIG Theory and the Double Slit Experiment, I was thinking:

With respect to the double slit experiment, if the photon/electron, etc., being in its collapsed state (i.e. black hole-like) prior to departure from its originating aperature, then proceeds to it becoming more spatial (MT=S in accordance with Coney Island Green), manifesting into a much much larger three dimensional spatial state, could it then not go through both slits? For instance, without the need for the current quantumn conundrum of splitting into two particles and having one particle go through both slits, like some sort of quantum magic? Current thought requires the particle to split and go through both slits, to be in two places at once, like magic. CIG theory allows some of the the particle, now in its spatial state, to go through one slit, and some of the particle to go through the remaining slit. No magic necessary. Much more believable.

The introduction of MT=S allows for the particle to go through both slits without the need for quantumn confusion. Then, the spatial field faces interference and diffraction, according to normal wave theory. It collapses accordingly when it "hits the wall", adhering to probabilities of wave function collapse (the probabilities may actually follow the 4th Law of Motion & the desire to reach time equilibrium). The collapse of the spatial field (S/T=M), reintroduces not the particle, but a new particle, only different from the first via its transmutations through its field interractions during its journey from the originating aperature, through both slits, subsequent wave interference, and final collapse.

What about quantum entaglement? What are the repercussions of CIG theory on quantum entanglement?

This post to be read in context with all other posts about Coney Island Green theory. Please follow the thought process of the other posts to discover CIG's interpretation of :

Dark Matter

Dark Energy

Red Shift Anomalies

Expanding Universe

Horizon Problem

Quantification of Matter to Space

& now, CIG's interpretation of the Double Slit Experiment

Up Next: quantum entanglement

CIG theory is a relativistic theory offering new possibilities , and, where Einstein stopped with matter warping the spacetime continuum, CIG theory takes the next logical step to state that it is the spacetime continuum itself that actually turns into matter.

Please read other nearby posts concerning CIG Theory.

5 days later
  • [deleted]

The Coney Island Green Theory - continuation of the thought process...

To be inserted into Coney Island Green Theory's discussion on CIG's reference to "Time Equilibrium" as the motivating force of all motion. Herein, some thoughts only on my understanding of "Charge" as it may relate to the topic. Further thought is undoubtedly necessary.

For the tie-in, read CIG's Fourth Law of Motion.

Somewhere in CIG I briefly stated that all motion was a desire to reach "Time Equilibrium". And by "Time", I mean rate, velocity with a vector, "c", percentages of "c", movement and motion.

If charge is "spin" brought about by an accelerating (movement again) particle, I gather a plus charge spins one way while a negative charge spins the oposite way.

Then, since everything is trying to reach "Time Equilibrium" (in accordance with CIG), unlike spin [movements in opposite directions (opposite times)] would attact to create the "Time Equilibrium".

Since "spins" in the same direction present a situation whereby "Time" would be additive in nature, creating a further dis-equilibrium, they repel each other.

Motion is a desire for particles to reach Time Equilibrium (re-read CIG's fourth law of motion).

I believe that the above is the true reason that like particles repel and unlike particles attract.

Does any of this make sense? This is the start of some random thinking along the lines of expanding the brief CIG comment regarding "Time Equilibrium". Motion Equilibrium.

Please read and fully understand all the implications of CIG Theory. Since I am not a physicist, it is apparent that if correct, the theory offers a lot more to the community than I can provide.

Please see the above posts by Douglas Lipp as regards solutions to natural and cosmological problems.

At such time as time allows, all CIG posts will be consolidated and incorporated in CIG Theory.

Thank you for making the effort to understand CIG Theory.

Douglas W Lipp

  • [deleted]

CIG Theory - a continuation

To clarify the above post wherein it is stated:

"If charge is "spin" brought about by an accelerating (movement again) particle, I gather a plus charge spins one way while a negative charge spins the oposite way."

Clarified -

It is the accelerating charged particle that results in "radiation".

Spin alone does not necessarily have to be accelerating. It can be non-accelerating velocity, however, it will have a vector associated with it, dependent upon the direction of spin.

When the charged "spinning" particle accelerates, it interrupts various other fields with their own spin characteristics. Along the way, our particle with its inspired "time-motion-"c"- percentages thereof-with vector arrow-rates along with its possessed angular velocity", inherent to our particle, attempts to reach "time equilibrium" with the many other "times" inherent to the other particles our original particle encounters. These fields are many and varied. The desire to reach this equilibrium results in "radiation" - radiating spatial quantities in accordance with the CIG quantification of mass to space.

The different densities of spatial manifestation result in the different types of matter (i.e. Dark Matter, Dark Energy).

All the different "decays" of the Standard Model also entail new Spatial effects as well.

Please read The Coney Island Green (CIG) Theory today

Among other things, CIG theory explains where space itself comes from.

Thank You

Douglas W Lipp

2 months later
  • [deleted]

Douglas W Lipp

THE CONEY ISLAND GREEN THEORY (continued)

Further To CIG Theory - You must read all posts below to understand this posting

From the Wiki site "Cosmological Constant" the following was excerpted:

"One possible explanation for the small but non-zero value was noted by Steven Weinberg in 1987 following the anthropic principle.[8] Weinberg explains that if the vacuum energy took different values in different domains of the universe, then observers would necessarily measure values similar to that which is observed: the formation of life-supporting structures would be suppressed in domains where the vacuum energy is much larger. "

Specifically, regarding, "Weinberg explains that if the vacuum energy took different values in different domains of the universe", the attached Coney Island Green Theory does exactly that.

I am stating in CIG (inherently implied) the theory's ability to explain exactly how vacuum energy takes on different values in different domains of the universe. Based on varying rates of massive particles. The same explanation I am providing for Dark Matter and Dark Energy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_catastrophe

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_constant_problem#Cosmological_constant_problem

Without little understanding of the topic, I am now going on record that CIG Theory solves both the Vacuum Energy Catastrophe as well as the Cosmological Constant Problem! As of this moment, CIG Theory claims to offer these solutions.

CIG Theory now offers an explaination for:

Vacuum Energy Catastrophe

Cosmological Constant Problem

Dark Matter

Dark Energy

Red Shift Anomalies

Red Shift

Accelerating Universe

Expanding Universe

A physical representation of E=mc²

The manifestation of mass to space (at the spatial density of H or He whatever it was)

AND MORE!

For a hard copy of CIG Theory please email me at lippfamily@earthlink.net

Respectfully,

Douglas W Lipp

6 days later
  • [deleted]

Natural Selection Derives From Cosmic Expansion

Two suggested editorial items:

I.

Origin And Nature Of Natural Selection

Update Concepts And Comprehension

Life is another mass format.

All mass formats are subject to natural selection.

Natural selection is delaying conversion of mass to energy fueling cosmic expansion.

Cosmic expansion is reconversion of all mass to energy.

Natural Selection Updated 2010

Beyond Historical Concepts

Natural Selection applies to ALL mass formats. Life is just one of them.

Natural Selection Defined:

Natural selection is E (energy) temporarily constrained in an m (mass) format.

Period.

Natural selection is a ubiquitous property of each and every and all cosmic mass, spin array, formats. Mass strives to increase its constrained energy content in attempt to postpone its conversion to energy and the addition of its constitutional energy to the totality of the cosmic energy that keeps fueling the cosmic expansion that goes on since the big bang.

Dov Henis

(Comments From The 22nd Century)

03.2010 Updated Life Manifest

http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/54.page#5065

Cosmic Evolution Simplified

http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/240/122.page#4427

Gravity Is The Monotheism Of The Cosmos

http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/260/122.page#4887

EOTOE, Embarrassingly obvious TOE, expanding the horizon beyond Darwin And Einstein

http://www.molecularfossils.com/2010/05/formal-test-of-theory-of-universal.html

============================================

Origin And Nature Of Natural Selection

Longevity Schmongevity Genes

It's Not The Procedure, But The Concept That Is Absurd

Longevity Genes Search Reflects Science Decadence

http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/320/122.page#6368

A. For most centenarians, longevity is written in the DNA.

A study of people who live past 100 reveals many genetic paths to a long life.

http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/60772/title/For_most_centenarians%2C_longevity_is_written_in_the_DNA

B. Longevity, survival, natural selection, evolution

- Merriam-Webster OnLine

Longevity = a : a long duration of individual life b : length of life

- Longevity is about survival, which is about "natural selection", which is about energy constrainment, which is about life evolution, which is about cosmic evolution. Every mass is destined to become energy to fuel the ongoing cosmic expansion. This is why organisms and black holes etc., eat, digest energy in mass forms, to avoid-postpone conversion to energy. This is evolution, which is natural selection, which is survival, which is longevity.

- All mass formats age. Life is a mass format. Searching for longevity genes is searching for evolution genes...

C. The search for longevity genes is a reflection of the 20th-21st centuries science decadence

Its concepts and terminology reflect the abandonment of basic science for adoption of the pretentious cancerous capitalist 20th-21st century technology culture.

Dov Henis

(Comments From The 22nd Century)

II.

Rethink Astronomy And The Universe

even without Quantum Unique Ergodicity, but with plain commonsense

Galactic clusters formed by dispersion, not by conglomeration. The proof of this is their behaviour, including acceleration, as Newtonian bodies.

These bodies formed at the start of inflation, when all energy was still in mass format, and the inflation was the start of reconversion of cosmic mass into energy.

Rethink

- A Basic Physics Tenet

- The Universe In Which We Live

A. Neutrino quick-change artist caught in the act

A transformation from one 'flavor' to another confirms the elusive elementary particles have mass and suggests a need for new physics.

http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/59825/title/Neutrino_quick-change_artist_caught_in_the_act

B. Adopt

- Each and every particle has mass.

- Dark energy and matter YOK.

- Higgs field/particle YOK.

- Do not be afraid of embarrassingly obvious answers. Adopt space-distance in lieu of space-time.

C. And Rethink The Universe

By the presently available data our universe is a dual-cycle array.

One cycle, the present, started from singularity, with all cosmic energy in mass format, and it has been proceeding to reconvert all the mass resolved at the big bang back to energy, by expanding the cosmos, by accelerating away the galaxy clusters.

The other cycle, the cycle that led to singularity, will re-start when the expanding cosmos consumes most or all mass that fuels the expansion. Gravity will then initiate reconversion of all the energy back to mass, to singularity, again.

Dov Henis

(Comments From The 22nd Century)

Cosmic Evolution Simplified

http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/240/122.page#4427

Gravity Is The Monotheism Of The Cosmos

http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/260/122.page#4887

EOTOE.Embarrassingly obvious expanding horizons beyond Darwin And Einstein.

http://www.molecularfossils.com/2010/05/formal-test-of-theory-of-universal.html

20 days later
  • [deleted]

To be pieced together with CIG Theory :

The dissapearance of length along the x-axis only is consistent with the fact that at the rate "c", only the forefront of the matter in motion observes that motion, while that matter behind it moves relative to the particles intimately close by - i. e. relative to their nearby matter friends, they are not in motion. Only the x-axis sees the rate "c". The matter chunks directly behind the forefront x-axis wait their turn to see that rate (unitil then , they see no motion). So, height and breadth only dissappear (contract) when they become exclusively x-axis matter. As length contracts - something must happen. Mass does not get heavier, rather, it transforms into space. And this is the space that Hubble saw through the red shift. Can someone find someone who can correlate the known percentages of Dark Matter & Dark Energy as predicted by my theory? If CIG is correct, the percentages will correlate with transformation along the x-axia, according to Lorentz transformations.

Photons have rest mass. Only at "c" do they shed all their mass. The space has to come from somewhere!

Don't worry about unit agreement. Units only touch upon the many faults in the theory. At the same time, a concern over units also misses the many natural observations the theory attempts to explain. Further, some unexplained natural features of the Universe are actually predicted by the theory.

There is no reason why the Standard Model should stop abruptly at sizes smaller than us. It must be extended upward and outward.

My next post will calrify units, as some people are worried about the units.

SEE PREVIOUS CONEY ISLAND GREEN THEORY POSTS

19 days later
  • [deleted]

Coney Island Green - continued - see all posts

Get This - "Another Link"

From the Wiki - Cosmological Constant site:

The cosmological constant Λ appears in Einstein's modified field equation in the form of

ADD Field Equation Here as it would not "cut and paste" see Wiki

where R and g pertain to the structure of spacetime, T pertains to matter and energy (thought of as affecting that structure), and G and c are conversion factors that arise from using traditional units of measurement. When Λ is zero, this reduces to the original field equation of general relativity. When T is zero, the field equation describes empty space (the vacuum).

The cosmological constant has the same effect as an intrinsic energy density of the vacuum, ρvac (and an associated pressure). In this context it is commonly defined with a proportionality factor of 8π: Λ = 8πρvac, where unit conventions of general relativity are used (otherwise factors of G and c would also appear). It is common to quote values of energy density directly, though still using the name "cosmological constant".

A positive vacuum energy density resulting from a cosmological constant implies a negative pressure, and vice versa. If the energy density is positive, the associated negative pressure will drive an accelerated expansion of empty space. (See dark energy and cosmic inflation for details.)

END Wiki

Enter CIG

OK - Specifically, where it is stated above, "When T is zero, the field equation describes empty space (the vacuum). & remember, " T pertains to matter and energy (thought of as affecting that structure)"

this correlates with CIG as follows:

In CIG, when matter [their T (not mine which states T=Time)] is no longer there, it has transformed into space [MT=S]. It is an interpretation that within the Einstein equation, and where T pertains to matter and energy (thought of as affecting that structure, and where it is also stated that When T is zero, the field equation describes empty space (the vacuum), this all correlates to CIG, whereby it is an active process through which matter manifests itself into the vaccuum. It is stated many times within CIG that this is due to varying rates (% of"c"). Spacetime must be broken.

SEE CONEY ISLAND GREEN THEORY TODAY

Send No money now!

Douglas W Lipp

The Wiki - Cosmological Constant site stuff did not cut & paste well - please go directly to the site and correlate with my additional comments:

Write a Reply...