It is an interesting and wide-ranging topic. We search for answers that link philosophy, mathematics, and physics, and of course, we must be careful about our assertions. We do not simply possess the truth about the origin of this universe.
Indeed, the concept of a fine-tuned universe is deeply relevant, and many possibilities can be extrapolated from it. The existence of physical constants intrigues me, and in my own theory of spherisation ,an evolutionary optimization process of the universe involving quantum and cosmological spheres , I consider the idea of an infinite, eternal consciousness, a kind of omnipotent God.
I believe strongly, though this is only my opinion and not a claim to truth, that the universe cannot be the result of a mere mathematical accident. The multiverse could also be a possibility, but perhaps uniqueness itself is important when we consider these constants. Why would there be a need to create other universes with different constants if an eternal, infinite consciousness is a reality? In that case, we return to the idea of essential uniqueness.
I therefore see the evolving design of the universe as having a purpose , this is the main meaning of spherisation: evolution, improvement, and purpose. Perhaps we are even creating this “paradise” through that process ,but of course, I do not assert my hypothesis as fact.
We evolve, yet we still know so little, and many principles remain to be discovered in the future of research. We face deep limitations. This uncertainty is also important; it is why we cannot draw final conclusions. At present, science can neither prove nor disprove God, but it seems that several evident mechanisms provide a kind of philosophical logic or direction.
The fine-tuning of the universe can indeed be interpreted theistically, but that remains a philosophical or metaphysical interpretation ,not a scientific conclusion at this stage. Therefore, we cannot assert or claim to know the truth; we can only try to understand the parameters, equations, axioms, and laws of the universe, while accepting their mathematical, physical, and philosophical limitations.
In conclusion, Ellis is right about the pluralistic nature of reality. We cannot reduce it to a single possibility, we must explore many, accepting our limitations while trying to complete the cosmic puzzle ,always respecting the determinism of the laws that govern it.
