Much Ado About Nothing

Hello dear Uncle Al,

Thanks for these informations ,it's very interesting .

Regards

Steve

Second test for chiral vacuum background (static) and Equivalence Principle parity violation (dynamic): Two differential scanning calorimeters (DSCs) are abutted and positioned so their sample pans are located along a north-south line. Each holds a ~3 mm diameter ~17 mg solid single crystal sphere of benzil, one in space group P3(1)21 (right-handed) and one in P3(2)21 (left-handed), mp = 95°C. In space groups P3(1)/P3(2) there are 1,2,4-thiadiazole-3,5-dicarbonitrile (mp = 67°C) or 2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)propionic acid (mp = 190 °C). In all cases the paired crystals' atomic mass distributions are maximally parity divergent but their melts are achiral (not racemic!).

/_H(fusion) for both are simultaneously run. The procedure is run with new single crystals at half-hour intervals for 24 hours. If all /_/_H(fusion) are not zero, the experiment is repeated the next day with the calorimeters aligned east-west to confirm. Maximima and minima will be displaced by six hours (below).

Static insertion of crystal left and right shoes into a vacuum left foot occurs with different energies. When the shoes melt into achiral socks that static energy difference explicitly appears,

http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/shoes.png

Earth's inertial spin acceleration and gravitational orbital acceleration (creating the signal in a composition Eotvos experiment) combine with paired-sample orientation to define a coordinate frame whose chirality cycles every 24 hours,

http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/orbit.png

That presents a dynamic 24-hr sinusoidal net residual /_/_H(fusion) here. There might be seven Eotvos balances on Earth. Borrowing a pair of DSCs is easy. Either way, the signal maximizes at 45 degrees latitude and 04 July perihelion.

A parity-retaining Eotvos experiment detects mass(inertial), mass(gravitational) divergence. Maximum sensitivity is 5x10^(-14) difference/average. A parity-destroying calorimetry experiment outputs the net signal as (/_m)c^2 energy. Benzil's /_H(fusion) = 112 J/g. A 10^(-13) g/g parity anomaly is 8.99 joules. 5x10^(-14) difference/average is 4% of background in a DSC with SOP 0.1% precision. The slow and expensive experiment is no better than the fast and inexpensive one.

Now, the fun part. Intitiate the Big Bang with a strong chiral pseudoscalar vacuum background. Decay of this false vacuum powers cosmic inflation. It sources the parity-violating Weak interaction. Its chiral symmetry breaking allows selection of matter over antimatter. Its trace residual after cosmic inflation initiates contemporary biological homochirality. Being limited to the massed sector, 10^(-14) relative chiral vacuum background cannot be detected by EM vacuum refractive index, dispersion, or gyrotropy even over cosmic distances. It could be there without contradiction of any prior observation in any venue at any scale.

Somebody should look. A chemistry undergraduate summer project could earn a historic Nobel Prize/Physics, hence the desirability of performing a parity Eotvos experiment in a physics research group. The whole world knows how to grow and machine high quality quartz.

I am going to see more about your informations and this Eotvos experiment ,it's fascinating .

Indeed the basis of the equivalence principle are so important in a model .

Thanks for that .

sincerely

Steve

Yes, particle grow out of vacuum. Vacuum energy is energy of quantum space. Quanta of space QS are building vacuum. In outher space density of vacuum is extremly high and quanta of space are forming into "cosmic waves" into fresh gas of elementary particles.

In black holes mass get transformed back into energy of vacuum, into energy of quantum space. Gravity motion is result of dynamics between density of vacuum and mass. See more in my article on file attached.

yours amritAttachment #1: Original_Solution_of_Gravity__ICFAI.pdf

Ted Jacobson has a valid idea about vacuum in discrete space, to replace the universe expansion through dark energy. What is the situation closer to truth depends on the the concepts of space and time. Are both these discrete? If you dicreteness is pushed to the limit, it becomes homogeneity when the unit of discreteness becomes smaller than what can be ever measured. Thus the whole business of quantum fluctuations really is based on measurement limits which are accompanied by measurement errors intrinsically speaking. In a way determinacy and indeterminacy are just two sides of the same coin and distinction between classical and quantum physics just becomes a game we play with larger number of atoms versus the smaller number of atoms in the sample under study, e.g 10 E 18 or 10 E 3. Now what lies in between, no one has yet bothered to cover, a region where neither macroscopic nor microscopic picture holds! In other words, one may have a situation where the Planck's constant can neither be considered 0 or its full value 'h'.

Dear Ted,

Will you read my essay http://www.vixra.org/abs/1208.0018

it is related to your essy

Animaría a Jabson a sostener basada su investigación, en las similitudes entre fenómenos con rasgos tan esencialmente dispares como los que de hecho se dan entre los mundos micro y macrocósmicos. Pienso que la aceptación de la existencia de "un medio" y de "una fuerza",inimaginables todavía y porque históricamente al igual que sucediera con Newton se observa cierta resistencia a reconocerlos, se abriría camino a una nueva física dable de favorecer la búsqueda hasta ahora infructuosa de una teoría del todo.

Hi, meaning to be helpful

-Google translate-

Quote "He would encourage Jabson to base his research on the similarities between phenomena with features as essentially disparate as those actually occurring between the micro and macrocosmic worlds. I think that the acceptance of the existence of "a means" and "a force", still unimaginable and because historically as happened with Newton there is some resistance to recognize them, would open the way to a new physics of favoring the search until Now unsuccessful of a theory of the whole." Aba Diaz Albo