Leshan,
First a typo correction: I meant QED, not QCD. In general in QCD we cannot use perturbation theory for low energy, and we use numerical simulations which are only accurate to about 90%.
Second, a disclaimer: I hope you are not offended by my criticism. Please feel free to poke holes in my essay as well.
"We never observed quarcks and gluons." Not true. Quarks were observed using electron scattering and this is what convinced physicists of the quark model; before that the bootstrap theory was in fashion.
"To hide this error, they invented konfinement". This is extremely well understood to the point that proving it has now become a graduate student homework problem.
"My new theory must be compatible with EXPERIMENTAL DATA only but not with QCD or old vision of spacetime! The Experimental data, but not your theory is the main knowledje." The problem is that QED and the Standard Model DO explain all current experimental data. That is why we need more powerful accelerators to generate new data that may be at odds with the current theories. So your theory has to first reach the same level of prediction as QED and QCD. Then we may consider predictions for new experiments.
"QCD is not a logical theory in general because confinement do not follow logically from theory. It is a mathematical model only." Yes it does follow logically from theory from the non-Abelian local symmetry group.
"QCD has a major problem - it is not possible to unify QCD with gravitation and other interactions." This is true.
"It is the main cause why QCD must fall." Yes, we already know the Standard Model and QCD is not the final word in describing reality, but gravity is extremely weak compared with the other forces and we could not even detect gravitational waves created by violent cosmic events, let alone the ones occurring at the atomic and subatomic levels.
"My holes can unify 3 interactions. If holes appear between nucleons, they 'glue' nucleons as a Descartes vessel. Holes can explain also gravitation and weak interaction."
Unlikely. If they glue the nucleons, than they cannot explain the weak force which is responsible for particle disintegration - the opposite of gluing.
"Another example for you that spacetime can be really removed. Imagine that spacetime consists of virtual atoms of spacetime that appears and disappears (Smolin and other scientists are agree that space is also made of discrete pieces). If the atom of spacetime disappear, then appear a vacant place - a hole that do not have the properties of space-time. You see, quantum spacetime allow for space to be removed. My theory use just the quantum spacetime."
Did you seek criticism from Smolin or other loop quantum gravity people?
'For an isolated volume we can shield gravity and it cannot violate EP." Shielding gravity is equivalent with a violation of EP: the inertial mass stays the same, but the gravitational mass is decreased because of the shielding. Hence the two masses are no longer the same for the duration of the shielding and therefore the EP is violated.
