Hello again Lawrence. Kindly consider the folliwing addition to my prior post:
Think of how genius, dreams, memory, and art are possible. Now think of this in keeping with this enormously important fact:
The ability of thought to describe OR reconfigure sense is ultimately dependent upon the extent to which thought is similar to sense.
Emotion, thought, feeling, and sensory experience are all fundamentally interactive. Dreams add to (or improve upon) what is the integrated extensiveness of being, experience, and thought. Dreams conceptually/actually unify gravity and electromagnetism/light. It is that simple.
Note the transparent space/sky around the larger and red [setting] sun.
(Telescopic/astronomical observations make the objects larger, or they could not be seen at all.) Importantly, isn't the increased transparency/invisibility of space, in relation to the blackness of night/outer space, the requirement of seeing farther?
LARGER OBJECTS, IN A RELATIVELY SMALLER SPACE -- COMPARABLE TO THE EARTH -- WOULD HAVE HIGHER GRAVITY, WOULD THEY NOT -- CONSIDERING THAT THE INVISIBILITY/TRANSPARENCY OF [THE SPACE] IS INCREASED?
Of huge importance, isn't the increasing transparency/invisibility of space the reason for the redshift?
How would your essay account for this?
FQXi -- DO NOT DELETE THIS POST.
