Taming of the One by Helmut Hansen

About the Mach Principle ,it's a little fight with the general relativity and the inertie .

I don't think what the origin of mass is the whole of universal mass ,of course all is linked and is dependant ,but the mass I think appears with the physical rotations of quantum spheres .This motion ,this rotation is a main part of all .

I think what evidently the whole of fundamental laws rest and we can't take off some referentials .Thus the rotation is of course linked with the ultim equation and its frequences ,oscillations of rotations in building .

In fact the Mac principle and the general relativity are closes ,nears .It's impossible to take off the fundamenatls thus it's impossible to contredict the Mac Principle .It's a specific sensorial interpretation of the Universe where all is linked .

It's the same with the rotations of spheres ,implying mass ,if all is aN entanglement of spheres with or without rotation thus all is in contact thus all is linked ,thus we can't take off even only one law or reality and its invariances ,coherences .

The centrifugal forces thus is a code where the cause is very very complex ,linked with the space and matter and its mass of gravitation implying gravitational waves .

But of course if we insert the evolution and the polarisation ,thus an increase of mass due to an activation of quantum spheres becoming thus mass and rule with a specific codes of rotations of all these spheres .

It's important and essential thus to have a real topology of this universal sphere ,where the mass and the gravitation more the spheres and the spherical gravitational waves ,are considered with their specifics variables ,parameters of the evolutive system .

The curvature thus is correlated with this gravity ,the mass ,the rotating quantum spheres more an universal constant with the cosmological sphere and its spheres in improvement near centers .

The mass evidently is linked and the centrifugal forces thus is linked ,but evidently we can't change the referential where all is coded by this ultim unknew entropy of pure light probably .

The light becomes mass ....

Sincerely

Steve

I speculate that quantum gravity might exhibit a layering of structure as one approaches the Planck scale. These structures might become more complex or abstract. Then at the Planck scale it is possible that physics in some sense ends, and what we identify as the quantum vacuum amounts to completely self-referential elements with no discernable structure. Physical reality at a scale larger than L_p = sqrt{G hbar/c^3) are then accidents of sorts, just as Chaitan has said that mathematics which obeys axiomatic rules are accidents which emerge from a vast set of self-referential propositions.

So beneath it all there might then be something similar to what Leibnitz speculated about with monads. Monads are fundamental structureless elements which mirror each other in a great net to define this grand unity underneath existence.

Cheers LC

Dear Helmut Hansen,

You wrote in Crane's page: the most central problem of making starships is surely the unsolved question: How can we overcome the lightbarrier?

I have another solution how to overcome the light barrier. If Universe has a limited volume, we can teleport a body by sending one outside of universe. (The original paper is here). Since a body cannot exist outside of universe, one reappears at random in the real Universe. If the disappearance and reappearance places do no coincides, it is faster than light teleportation. The distance between start and finish points can be very long. Outside of Universe is nothing, it is a hole in space-time. To send a body outside of the universe we must envelope a body with a closed hole surface consisting of holes in space-time. There are some methods how to create holes.

Sincerely, Leshan

Hi Helmut,

I have left a comment for you on the end of my essay.

Looks like we are on similar tracks, with regard to metaphysics/theology. In my picture, all data is both physical and metaphysical data, everything depends on the model we use to interpret it. I go with Landauer's hypothesis that all information is represented physically.

I spent quite a while in the Roman Catholic Dominican Order before being let go for unorthodoxy. My essay is the next step in a long project to formulate a reconciliation of the God of Aquinas' Summa with the universe I experience. I have a rather ramshackle website at naturaltheology.net which might convey a bit more detail. It is rather unmaintained, but hope to catch up one day when I stop working for a living, the children grow up, etc

I see the smallest as the quantum of action, but fear Russells paradox and related demons when we try to talk about the largest. As of about twenty years the layered transfinite network approach has seemed quite good to me.

All the best,

Jeffrey --- http://www.fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/533

Dear Helmut,

I have read the referenced paper and take your pojnt. I think I was moved by your reference to metaphysics. I think that I see metaphysics (in a nutshell), as the boundary by causal connections imposed by the mathematical theory of communication, or more generally, as the theory of computation. Rather like the tourist who asked the mythical Irishman for directions to a certain destination and was told 'you can't get to there from here, you'll have to start somewhere else.'

Best regards,

Jeffrey

Helmut, I have read your statement and we are close to being in agreement but there is one evolved difference...I have mistakenly assumed that God is a perfect being.

God is not a perfect being. God is an omnipotent, omniscient and omipresent being...all transcendent attributes of being but not also descriptions of perfection.

Perfection is not a state of individual or unique existence. Perfection describes a balanced condition between at least two objects, forces or relationships. The condition is a result of the existence of more than oneness...an object plus a force or an object plus an object...any combination that results in two or more creates a possible condition of perfection. If the condition of two or more does not also contain the ability to sense the presence of otherness and to respond with a change in self presence then there is a physical condition that can be described as perfection if the components of otherness maintain their uniqueness within all possible configurations of the originally observed condition.

If the two or more does contain the ability to sense the presence of otherness and the ability to respond with a change in self presence then there is a decisional (freewill) condition that can be described as perfection if the decision and change is made in order to maintain the originally observed condition within all possible sensed configurations of the originally observed condition. In this case there is also the continuing possibility of choosing not to maintain the originally observed condition. So perfection can be the continuing result of a physical condition or a decisional (freewill) condition.

The Creator in my position is omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, and capable of changing...also, the Creator of perfection.

Regards,

Irvon