Dear Dr. Minguzzi,
Thank you for your archive reference. I am not sure why I did not notice your paper there this Monday, because every Monday I read all the prior weak papers. Anyway, I will carefully read your proof.
About CTCs, probably the best intuitive argument against them was found by Boulware who noted that a particle can get generated at one point in space-time, travels around the CTC and can get re-absorbed at the creation point. The problem is that the particle is picking up a phase differential which will destroy coherence and unitarity. Another consequence of a CTC is the complete lack of free will and this means we were pre-ordained since the Big Bang time to have this conversation.
You stated in your essay the following 6 points:
1. There is an entity which we call God that satisfies the following points.
2. God has created the world.
3. God cannot be wrong.
4. The will of God is eternal.
5. God created all the times, in particular God precedes all the times in a causal way. Nevertheless, God does not precede the times in a temporal way as the times did not exist before their creation.
6. Although God is not in our time, there is a kind of God's perception of time radically different from that of humans. For God time is still, eternal, it is not perceived as a flow.
Please consider the following substitution: God=the platonic world of math:
1. There is an entity which we call the platonic world of math that satisfies the following points.
2. The platonic world of math has created the world.
3. The platonic world of math cannot be wrong.
4. The will of the platonic world of math is eternal.
5. The platonic world of math created all the times, in particular the platonic world of math precedes all the times in a causal way. Nevertheless, the platonic world of math does not precede the times in a temporal way as the times did not exist before their creation.
6. Although the platonic world of math is not in our time, there is a kind of the platonic world of math's perception of time radically different from that of humans. For the platonic world of math time is still, eternal, it is not perceived as a flow.
The 6 new statements are still true. The point I am trying to prove in my essay: "Heuristic rule for constructing physics axiomatization" is that physics and math can be unified and reality is made only out of mathematical relational structures. I may sound crazy, but one can actually obtain powerful concrete mathematical consequences from this, like the necessity of space-time and of quantum mechanics.