What\'s Ultimately Possible in Physics by Paul N Butler

Cristinel,

On the one hand it is good to hear that you have several projects to work on because that means you likely have adequate income, which is good for you in the current state of the local economy. On the other hand, although the initial compatibility test phase would not demand much of your time, the full transfer of basic fourth vector concepts, the time required for the receiver to extrapolate more advanced concepts on his own from the basics (This is a required step. Advanced concepts will not be transferred, but must be developed locally to meet minimum cooperative protocols.), and the generation of the necessary structural math models will almost surely take many man years of work on the part of the selected receiver. This could possibly be reduced if several adequate receivers who can work together are found, however. Even so, it will still likely require much long term work to complete the transfer and local development of fourth vector technology to the point that those involved will receive the great rewards that will be due to them from the local societal structure because many of the concepts are contrary to man's current scientific belief structure. It will, therefore, likely require adequate experimental proof, which will not come until the concepts are understood and developed close to the point of practical use. Your current busy condition means that you would not likely have adequate time to devote to this endeavor.

Thank you for your offer to give quick answers in the areas where you are competent. I am not sure of what all of your areas of competence are, so maybe you could let me know about them in a little detail so I will know what is acceptable to ask about from you. There are a couple of questions that I would like to get the answers to if you know them or if you don't know them, but you know someone else that would know the answers to them maybe you could refer them to me or me to them. The first is: Have there been any experiments done in which a photon of about .511MEV has been changed into an electron that is about at rest or any experiments in which an electron about at rest has been changed into a photon of about .511 MEV. If so, has any one looked at the frequency and/or wavelength of the photon before the change and then looked at the frequency and/or wavelength of the resultant electron to see if it is the same as that of the initial photon or not and if not what is the difference? The same question applies to the pre and post frequency and/or wavelength in a change from an electron to a photon. I am looking for the results of an actual experiment and not just a math calculation of what is expected by theory if possible. An experiment in which the initial photon is greater than .511 MEV and produces an electron that is not at rest or one in which an initial electron that is not at rest produces a photon greater than .511 MEV would also be of interest if it contains the pre and post frequency and/or wavelength information as described above. The second question is: What is the predominant current belief as to why the speed of light is what it is and not some other value?

It looks like they may soon close out access to these contest pages since the contest is now officially completed. If it is closed out, or if you just prefer to, you can reach me at pljb1@juno.com to give me the answers if you can get them for me and to tell me about your areas of expertise so I will know what types of questions you might be able to answer for me. Some other way for me to reach you other than by this page would also be helpful if you want to continue communication after these pages are closed.

May you be successful in your many projects. I would be interested in hearing about what they are if they are not considered secret, etc. and you would not consider it an invasion of your privacy or anything. All I know at this time is that you work as a computer programmer on computational geometry and are working on your doctoral degree in fiber bundle geometry. You also apparently do some independent research in the area of attempting to reconcile quantum theory with relativity theory per your paper. I guess these things could keep you busy. You are right that you can get around the quantum effects. They are due to certain dimensional structural and inter-dimensional interface relationships. The key is to access and understand the level of structure below these effects that generates them.

Dear Paul,

I answered you by email.