Consider the following in keeping with my prior post.
Do you not agree that telescopic/astronomical observations are "activating" -- similar to dreams -- what would otherwise be the waking/ordinary visual experience of the stars?
See my essay please. Thanks.
My victory in this contest is assured. I will make it very easy for you all. Thank you for your kind consideration. The following is extremely important.
Do you understand the GIGANTIC significance of the following three statements taken together?:
1) The ability of thought to describe OR reconfigure sense is ultimately dependent upon the extent to which thought is similar to sensory experience.
2) Dreams involve a fundamental integration AND spreading of being, experience, and thought at the [gravitational and electromagnetic] MID-RANGE of feeling BETWEEN thought AND sense.
3) Dreams make thought more like sensory experience IN GENERAL (including gravity and electromagnetism).
Now, also consider the following:
These are the essential parameters/requirements regarding the demonstration/proof of what is ultimately possible in physics.
1) Making thought more like sensory experience in general.
2) Space manifesting as gravitational/electromagnetic energy.
3) Balancing/uniting scale.
4) Exhibiting/demonstrating particle/wave.
5) Repulsive/attractive.
What is ultimately possible in physics cannot (and should not) be properly/fully understood apart from this great truth:
The ability of thought to describe OR reconfigure sense is ultimately dependent upon the extent to which thought is similar to sensory experience.
My essay is a new understanding of physics as it applies to experience (including the understanding) in general. The importance of this essay is not to be underestimated.
In keeping with the conclusions/ideas of this essay, did you know that I have explained why the Common Chimpanzees live two-thirds as long as we do (in captivity, of course)?
TO ALL REVIEWERS OF THIS ESSAY:
I already demonstrated the three to one ratio (one third), consistent with BOTH time and space. Moreover, as you know, when a fourth dimension of space is added to Einstein's theory (and you then do the math), you get both Maxwell's theory of light and Einstein's theory of gravity -- a mathematical union that some have deemed as "miraculous" (Paul Davies).
The math is done. It is obvious to anyone with any common sense that this union has to be plainly and significantly evident in our experience -- and it is, as dream experience. I have proven this in a clear, consistent, and comprehensive fashion. You all need to admit the clear facts, regardless of whether you (including FQXi) like it or not.
There is one person who clearly deserves to win this contest, and it is I.
ON THE SIGNIFICANCE OF MY ESSAY:
Representations of thought as sensory experience are basically beautiful, powerful, and/or captivating -- this is the connection with art, TV, truth, physics, and power. To the extent that the truth mirrors the integrated extensiveness of nature/the natural, these ideas are held to be more beautiful/desirable -- although they can be shocking. The deepest truths require the greatest/deepest strength. Dreams represent thought as sensory experience IN GENERAL -- so this may be held to be an experience of excessive or extreme genius, thereby (in this meaniningful sense) making dream experience generally less desirable than waking experience.
The highest thoughts of genius and the best theory of physics necessarily involve/pertain to past/present/future extensiveness of experience.
This is a fact of great significance.
Since astronomical/telescopic observations are already, to a significant extent, an interactive creation of thought, the ability to comprehend them is necessarily diminished; for it is in the description of what is the integrated and natural extensiveness of experience (past, present, and future) that our greatest, most beautiful, and daring theories are found.
Television may be seen as an accelerated experience of art. TV is a creation of generalized thought. TV is even more similar to thought than in the case of dream vision/experience. This is why the visual images in TV become even more shifting and variable than those of the dream. (Thoughts are relatively shifting and variable).
This essay talks about the "telescoping"/narrowing of vision in dreams and in astronomical/telescopic observations as well. The following provides additional proof on the originality and importance of my essay:
The increased invisibility/transparency of space is a requirement of these astronomical/telescopic observations. Importantly, there is a "telescoping"/narrowing of vision in dreams too. (Dreams make thought more like sensory experience in general, including gravity and electromagnetism/light.)Astronomical/telescopic observations have significant similarities with dream vision. Dream vision is constantly active/shifting/variable. Similarly, telescopic/astronomical observations are "activating " what would otherwise be the [basically] unmoving stars at night (as seen by the unaided eye). Astronomical/telescopic observations are interactive creations of thought to a significant extent. Red borders black and transparent. Supernovas and the red sun both only last so long, as well. Witness the clear space around the red [larger] setting sun. Telescopes are known to function as a sort of "big eye". Note the clear and black parts of the eye. Astronomical/telescopic observations make objects larger, or they could not be seen. Yet they are in a smaller space, and dreams are in/involve a smaller space. The earth may also be considered to be in a smaller (and transparent) space. THINK! Dreams involve how a larger space is made smaller, and also how a smaller space is made larger.
TO FQXI:
No outside reviewers of this essay are required or necessary. Indeed, this is why I CLEARLY deserve to win this essay contest:
The most elemental/fundamental/deepest way (or manner) in which human thought is [comprehensively and consistently] enmeshed and interactive with physical (and this includes sensory, of course!)experience is the source of our deepest genius and of the deepest and broadest conclusions/unifications that are revealed (and possible) in physics.
This above is in keeping with the FACT that the ability of thought to describe OR reconfigure sense is ultimately dependent upon the extent to which thought is similar to sensory experience.
Electromagnetric space (e.g., photons and the Sun) is both larger and smaller than ordinary or typical space (such as the Earth). When space manifests as gravitational/electromagnetic energy, scale is then balanced, space is particle/wave, invisible/visible, and larger/smaller. Accordingly, space is both repulsive and attractive as well.
Kindly consider the following:
The most elemental/fundamental/deepest way (or manner) in which human thought is [comprehensively and consistently] enmeshed and interactive with physical (and this includes sensory, of course!) experience is the source of our deepest genius and of the deepest and broadest conclusions/unifications that are revealed (and possible) in physics.
The above is in keeping with the FACT that the ability of thought to describe OR reconfigure sense is ultimately dependent upon the extent to which thought is similar to sensory experience. This relates to memory and genius.
Now, carefully consider, in keeping with the above, that: Dreams involve a fundamental integration and spreading of being, experience, and thought at the [gravitational and electromagnetic] mid-range of feeling between thought and sensory experience.
