One Possible Unifing Theory by Bashir Yusuf

Hello dear Steve Dufourny,

Happy to meet you, the theory of Spheriation and many other similar theories.

the best thing human may have seems to be knowledge, so i like share it with others, so I hope we will descuss more

Best Regards

Bashir Yusuf

Dear Steve

I have to apologize for the delayed answer,

Once again, Thank you for the kindly comment toward the essay, I m well and hope you too.

In participation on the different threads;

I was too busy, there is many essays and almost all seems telling fact of same thing but in different aspects/angles so I decided to read carefully to understand before saying any thing, and I hope I will participate discussion soon.

I think we are also saying same thing, although there may be some misunderstandings.

In the term of existence of multi-dimensions I used to express every opposite two spheres (figure in page 6 in the essay) for Gravitational balancing(center of Gravity), and may come in question when talking about the structure spheres and the Gravitational pairing of the spheres (clumping) that static, otherwise I agree, the 3D space may be used. Rotating systems is also essential, when talking about dynamics, the next in the essay (page 4);

"The rotation and circulation (spinals and orbitals) are (may be) caused by the central components gravitational interaction dynamically"

You say "I beleive in fact that an entanglement possesses a specif serie from the main cnetral sphere"

Compare that (above) statement and figure 2 in page 6 in the essay "Body centered initial clumping"

I have visited your home page at SICU, I read the summarized note of the theory, and if it is possible I would like the complete note of the theory of Spherization,

Could you please tell me where I can get it, or any more presentation the theory?

Please give a picture of your Idea toward the Sphere, Photon, Light, Mass, Gravity, Charge, Dark Matter, and (what ever you can about Universes Particle theory), for better understanding.

Best regards

Bashir

Dear Steve

HTML tags are not permitted in posts, and will automatically be stripped out

(The FQXI website)

but web adrees at SICU and the Summarized note is followng attachment;

Spherization Theory resume ..t's difficult to resume but I'm going to try...

What is the Spherisation's Theory about ?

all goes to the spherisation,it's logic,mathematic, foundamental, rational.......the sphere is the equilibrium it'snt divisible

• All is coded

• Univers goes to the spherisation Galaxies too Stars Planets Brains in relativity....

• All is linked,unified since the begining ?the Big Bang,I think That spheres are ultim particles,the Gravity,there is an universal code,all spheres with an logic of buildings GRAVITY AND VELOCITY ROTATION SPIN SPIN SPIN

coded velocity rotation =mass=energy

spatial code

time code

ALL IS THE SAME QUARKS LEPTONS HADRONS BARYONS NEUTRINOS NEUTRONS PROTONS HIGGS bosons MAGNETON Planck particles......les Fermi particles...........spheres and spheroids................

• I think there are minimum 2 Planck walls limits Limit membran universal spheroid and limit small ,ultim sphere in all thing

• BIG BANG THEORY ??? since about 14 billions years multiplication of spheres.................space time energy mathematic code.................polarization +-...3.5billlionsyears......hydrospheroid.......................................................................................... SPHERISATION ..............H......Helium Deuterium Hydrogen and others .....C.........N.........O......++++++++CODED and mathematic codes ENERGY ........H2O .... NH3... CH4 H2C2.... HCN..................... K... Fe Mg Mn Al ...... S Si ..........PYROXENS AMPHIBOLS SiO SILICATES... SPHERIZATIO......proteins/enzyms INE ASE........AMINO-ACID......BUILDINGS .ADN ......SPHERIZATION.......... ................................................................ .....................................................................................................................GLUCID LIPIP PROTID PROTIST UNICELL PROTOZ .........phytoflagellates zooflagellates .....animal vegetal SPHERIZATION dedifferenciation.....PLURICELL EVOLUTION HARMONY................................. SPHERIZATION ............................................................... ....LOCOMOTION NUTRITION REPRODUCTION...............EVOLUTION..................ANNELIDS .......... SPONGES ........... .. MEDUSAS................. CHORDS ........... VERTEB.........SPHERIZATION.......HOMINIDS ..........LUCY TOUMAI.........erectus......habilis ...............HOMO SAPIENS SAPIENS NOT REALLY SAPIENS...IN FACT... ......SPHERISATION HOMO REALLY SAPIENS FOR ................ SECOND PLANK WALL THE LIMIT AFTER THIS FIRST STEP

• LOGIC...PHILOSOPHIC... SPHERISATION .......RESOLVE PROBLEMS AND LEARN ..................UNIVERSAL SPHERE

• Apllications physic ,mathematic,economy,chemistry,biology,technologies,health,phylosophy......

Best regards

BashirAttachment #1: Spherization_theory____Steve_Dufoury.docx

Ted

Thanks for your comment,

Yes, We together with others so inclined, may try to answer the question (Einstein-Max Born)

since the reality is open(fair).

I believe also anyone may answer any time,(the reality is for common thing).

Best Regards

Bashir

Ted

Regarding the question of; Can we, together with others so inclined, answer his 2nd sentence?

The Answer is yes.

Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and Relativity Theory

I dont have problem about the two theories Quantum Mechanics and Relativity Theory, both are right (and wrong if misinterpretation), due to inadequate understanding of Natures simple basics.

I believe all the Quantum Mechanics and Relativity theory conflict is depending on understanding of wave/particle duality which basically depending on deeply/simply understanding of facts of the following two;

1. Existence and Structure of particles

2. Gravitation Force System

Suppose that you have strong attracting materials, say magnets in your hands, your hands may feel this attracting force, assume that; your hands as electrons(or/and protons), the magnets as photons, and the attracting force(as gravitational influence) as light. This is what exactly we mean photons and light situation may look like.

Suppose Proton/electron as body centered spherical particles those made up from a smaller spherical elementary particles (photons), see figure 2 in the essay (initial clustering of particles).

Assuming the light as gravitational force influence, and photon electron as a Particle that may interact using, gravitational force influence is quite pretty idea, that might be an important key of understanding of natures basic structure.

It is not to confuse the existence of photon, traveling system of photon and light.

The photon does not scatter out and in from matter to matter, instead its force (as gravitational influence) transfer from matter to matte

Otherwise the problem of QM and GR may arise.

There are physical problems to solve (before anything) namely the Displacement and the type of motion. The complexity of wave-particle duality lies here, we can simplify by using classical physics as we know that particles interacts each other with gravitational force, and this force can we interpret as a static or dynamic influence of gravitational force (gravitational wave).

The all matter in the universe including the Dark matter basically contain a homogenous type of particle namely Photons.

All particles except Photons are interchangeable.

Generally different amount of this type of particle makes different particle.

Fundamentally, this numerical combination makes two systems namely odd and even, (Charged and Neutral).

The force that acting all systems at any level is Gravity.

Multi Dimensions take place at the beginning of clumping process of particles

Sphere is the shape photons, have.

Further more you may probably help to create better understanding environment by investigating problems related.

nobody except Ted Erikson and Steve Dufourny my friends of spherical particle theory asked a question or told that and how they understood.

I would like to hear from them rather than answering unasked question. (NB. that almost all this text is in the essay).

I have also tried to answer the questions of, What is charge?

that I demonstrated in this updated file (Attachment).

I have difficult with some terminology;

suppergravity

Lie group E8

Qubits

C-field......

which I think that their usage are related to what I am trying to explain here and in the essay....and mean.

please compare these small spheres (group spheres) to quantum bits........

Best wishes

BashirAttachment #1: Bashir_Quantum_Mech_and_Relativity_Theory.pdf

Dear all,

The winning essay of this contest concludes that nature is digital (discrete).

And now, I wonder following;

Isn't the photon the Nature most elementary particle, and the Light its Gravitational interaction?

Hasn't the nature same fundamentals?. Particles?

I have tried to explore a broad area in physical science in different aspect and compare to existing known scientific theories. There are no remarkable contradictions with accepted theories (except the term of mass-less Particle). I have tried to interpret a better Unified theory.

Gravity is the basic interaction (force).

Photon is the ultimate elementary particle that every thing is made of.

Sphere/cal shape is dominating shape of the Nature.

In my opinion toward particle theory in both astrophysical and subatomic particles including even the Dark matter (WIMPs and MACHOs), are based on the quantum (quantity) of the most elementary particles.

The characteristics of the Natures Elementary charge is significant in the charged subatomic particles , such as Proton, Electrons, while it is trivial in the other Neutral particles, such as Neutron, Neutrino, and Neutron star, this phenomena is seemingly based on quantum of what may called ultimate elementary particles.

It is about ODD and EVEN numbers. Our conclusion of particle system hierarchy is that there are two main categories due to quantity of Photons.

For more explanation see my essay;

http://www.fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/794

So far, I noticed many confirmations with this simple Idea, but more complex and advanced explanations (partial view), while loosing the main picture.

I don't really understand why most people try most complex and abstract way to explain a simple question/s.

Nevertheless our physical reality has a limit that depends on validity of unit measurements (Mass, Space and Time). How far these three (minimum requirement) most fundamental unit are valid we may discuss the reality, other wise not.

If my interpretation is wrong I could suspect the information I received (current Physics).

I don't feel funny repeating the terms of I, My, the same time we trying some universal things and the other hand can't be happy seeing the people ignoring what I think to be more important truth without any satisfactory answer.

Collective thinking is very important for tracing the reality. Therefore I think that the best way is to gather all new real things in all essays and to integrate in a overall and more profound edition to ensure that we don't miss any truth. The Reality is more worth than what we can pay for it, In other words we should not only think about prize and who wins but also think what is there.

I also believe that there is enough information regarding the question toward physical reality but our view (imagination) is important to compile (integrate our information). Our decision is based on discrete information (data) that we integrate.

Here are some of my favorite quotes from Richard P. Feynman;

"I learned very early the difference between knowing the name of something and knowing something."

"Well, Mr. Frankel, who started this program, began to suffer from the computer disease that anybody who works with computers now knows about. It's a very serious disease and it interferes completely with the work. The trouble with computers is you *play* with them. They are so wonderful. You have these switches - if it's an even number you do this, if it's an odd number you do that - and pretty soon you can do more and more elaborate things if you are clever enough, on one machine"

Best wishes

Bashir