Theory of Everything by Sridattadev Kancharla

Dear Basudeba,

I did my bachelors and master of science in chemical engineering and currently well settled and working as a software engineer in USA. I have never read any Shastras or Vedas, except for some quintessential poems that my father taught me as a kid which I mentioned in one of my comments above. My mother is Principal of a medical college and my father is head of Biochemistry department and both are medical doctors. My wife is a doctoral scientist in molecular biology. I am a father of 3 beautiful kids and I do not need any fame or name or money that comes along with it. I myself have followed several theoritical physics observations and presentations about the universe and felt that they are all left wanting for the truth.

I do not consider myself associated with any religion, but I can tell this that all religions are trying to convey the same truth which scientists of theoritical physics and mathematics are trying to convey in different language. I am just trying to connect these paths at the truth of singularity thats all. I have been through several personal experiences in life which have lead me to the path of realizing the truth inside all of us. I am (ego of my body and my mind) already dead, only I or singualrity lives. I am doing this job of expressing the truth as I inside me directs me to do it. My job is done even if at least one person reads what I conveyed and understands and experiences the singularity of love, I will continue in that person.

You are right about Big Bang, it is not the begining of the universe and there is no end to universe as it is infinite. I can now say that I know absolutely nothing and only absolutely nothing is infinite.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Dear Basudeba,

One has to let go off ones body and mind to understand what I say. In normal reality it means one has to accept death to understand singularity. We have the proof with in us (death or black hole), it is only a matter of space and time when one realizes it.

Please experience the

Singularity.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Dear Constantinos,

I have read your essay "A world with out quanta" and undestand your point of view. The new prime physis eta you have described is yet another beautiful attempt to symbolize the singularity or absolutely nothing or I. It is out of singularity or I that everything emerges. This prime source of singularity is beyond matter and energy and there are no words or symbols to describe it but can be experienced in all of us. Generations have come before us and will come after us and will try to understand the universe as external observers, until one merges one self fully and realizes that one is the observer and the observed (singualrity), they will not fully comprehend the truth. Krishna, Moses, Jesus, Buddha, Shirdi Sai were all great teachers who have realized this truth of singularity and tried to share the joy of love and lead us in the right direction on our journey on this planet. We as humans are straying away from the path of love and leading towards total destruction. I hope that someday all the sciences and religions converge at the ultimate truth of singularity (Analog) and make this world a better place for all the living beings on this planet or else there will be no more us (duality or digital) as we will be merged back with singularity anyways.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Sridattadev

A Beautiful essay. Thank you, there seems much stress and discord from some here at times, and more should read yours. But should a theory of everything not include eternal life? Quite accidentally through my logical model of discrete fields, I have found a scientific theory, as logical conclusion, showing how it can work in reality. If time passes instantly when we die, we will reawaken immediately. Of course many of the sane and serious here would consider that nonsense, and my essay very seriously finds unity between Special Relativity and Quantum mechanics, leading to General Relativity. I beleive it opens major opportunity for overdue advancement.

I hope you'll read it. http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/803 I hope you can find the solution (you need high skills of conceptual dynamic visualisation), but if not go on the the paper I refer to, which may explain better. http://vixra.org/abs/1102.0016

Peace and love eternally

Peter

Dear Peter,

I have read your wonderful article about recycling nature of the universe and that is the truth. One who fully understands this truth is immortal and lives eternally. Life is love. One who is not loving is already dead. Jesus understood this better than any one of his times and tried to convey the message of love. We in this so called modern scientific age are ignorant of the fundamental truth of life or love and are fighting in the name of race and religion. I have explained how the recycling happens with in ourselves at the below link, which corresponds to the external scientific observations being made.

Singularity of love.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Dear All,

I am concluding my conversations in this contest and these are my final thoughts regarding our quest to realize the truth. Now that I know absolutely nothing, I do not care for how many dimensions there are or what reality is made of. I have come up with n-sphere representation of the universe, so as to put a conclusion to enquiry in to the unknown. I have said in the original essay, there is no space unless one chooses to measure and there is no time until one chooses to count. If we just look around at all other different species of living beings on this planet, this simple truth becomes apparent. We are caught up in this black hole of quest to realize how everything works and ignoring the beauty of the singularity of love in all of us. I hope if we just start loving and caring for each other and other beings on this plaent we will be in more touch with reality (be it analog mode or digital mode) and that is the closest we can get to the ultimate truth of love.

Be in Love to Rest in Peace,

Sridattadev.

Dear Sir,

You are associated with science and try to be a good scientist. A good scientist doesn't talk without proof. Have you ever "let go off ones body and mind" to experience what you are talking about. If not, how can you know about what you are talking about that state. Have you ever died to have proof about what you say. If so, after death, how did you retain that memory? Can you produce your proof for scientific scrutiny? Are you proclaiming yourself to be God, which you obviously are not.

Once again we request you please not to sully the image of this great Country as a land of fraudulent Godmen. There are plenty of people who are already doing that. We also happen to know something of the Upanishads and Darshan. We posit that you do not have any knowledge of these subjects and only quote select portions incoherently to impress the gullible public. We challenge you for a public debate on any subject to prove this point. This is not to prove our superiority, but only to show that you are trying to use the name of our shaashtras to gain name and fame for yourself thereby discrediting them.

Hope you will see reason. "Ya pashyati sa pashyati".

Regards,

basudeba

Dear Sridattadev,

Your message is well received! We share in our passion to know and understand our world and "everything in it". To paraphrase an ancient Greek saying, "A Universe unexamined is not worth having!". And we agree with another ancient Greek saying, equally powerful and most relevant to physics, that,"Man is the Measure of All Things". These have guided my thinking and outlook as I seek to better understand our physical world and the human beings in it.

In my essay, I show that it is possible to mathematically derive Basic Law of Physics starting with the undefined and undefinable 'prime physis quantity eta'. That this quantity is undefined, makes the results in my essay a "Theory of Everything".

More recently I posted a mathematical proof of the following proposition so central to modern Physics: "If the speed of light is constant, then light is a wave".

These results are profound and iconoclastic. I need your support in bringing my essay before the panel of experts for serious review. Please help ...

... in Unity and Love,

Constantinos

Dear Constantinos,

You are the one mathematician that will ever get closest to what I am trying to convey spiritually / philosophically. I wish you all the best in your pursuit to make the scientific world see what we are trying to convey. I know that you will climb that mountain and that day my friend please remember to spread the word of true love of singularity and see that there can be peace on this earth. I will definitely rate your article very high.

Love and Peace,

Sridattadev.

Greetings,

I only got to read this after the deadline, and I'm not certain I would have graded it approvingly, but I wanted you to know I appreciate what you wrote.

I especially like the column of observations contrasting the individual and pervasive descriptions of various qualities. The difference between saying "I am" and "I is," for example, is a profound shift of mind-set. It is a shame, and a betrayal of our infinite nature, that it is considered improper to use word constructions like "I is good," when speaking of identity more broadly or spiritually (referring to the universal I).

I always liked the way that Rastafarians speak, as it honors this perception of reality, or makes the perceptual shift clearly verbalized. They might say "I and I go to the store, Mon" when they want you to come along or to bring them there. Another phrase would be "I said to I" when saying you told something to a friend or when he was saying he told something to you. In any case, there is some wisdom to expanding concepts we generally view from the limited personal perspective.

I talk a little about this in my essay as a contrast between left-brain and right-brain thinking. But I did enjoy what you wrote, not so much because I thought it was a great essay, but because it really made me think - and expanded the range of comprehensibility for some ways of thinking.

All the Best,

Jonathan

Dear Basudeba,

Everything and nothing is god, god is absolute state of mind, which is the soul in its absolute form. One needs to look inside of one self to realize this state and yes I have experienced the soul inside this entity Sridattadev and found that there is only one absolute soul in this universe. Please know that you are also the same soul or God. All I is conveying is that every one should realize this truth in themselves and that they are no less or more than any one else and this experience is the singularity. I in you is just testing if this body and mind of so called Sridattadev thinks itself as important and I do not consider this person is of any importance, it is just a vehicle for the universal I or god.

I am not a pandit of shastras or vedas but I do know that, "Tat tvam asi" is the essence of all vedas and it means that you are god once you realize the truth. All I want is for everyone to realize this simple truth about themselves.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Dear Sir,

God cannot be love for the simple reason that they exhibit different characteristics. Love always implies duality trying to unite. It has an opposite - hate. God is supposed to create many out of Himself - one becoming dual and so on. God is omnipresent, omniscient and omnipotent. His opposite has to be non-existent, non-sentient and non-reactive. Such a being is impossible to exist. Thus, your description is not correct.

Love belongs to the 24 Tattwa division, which are known as Atma Tattwa. Then there are seven Vidyaa Tattwas and five Shiva Tattwas. God can be explained through the last category. Adwait also belongs to this category.

In case you want to know more about this, you may contact us at mbasudeba@gmail.com.

Regards,

basudeba.

Dear Sir,

It is true that "Tat tvam asi" is the essence of all Vedas, but what are the meanings of "tat", "twam", "asi" and "Tat tvam asi"? These are four serious questions that are discussed in the Rik, Saama, Yajus and Atharvan Vedas respectively. That is the reason it is said that: "Richaa moorthih, Yaajunshi gati, Saama maya tejah, Athavaangirasam aapah". But none of the existing commentaries on the Vedas including that of Saayana deal with this interpretation. Unless one understands these correctly, one cannot talk about them authoritatively.

Hence please try to understand these properly first. Then your entire idea will change.

Regards,

basudeba.

Dear Sir,

We have defined infinity in many of our threads and cannot leave it out of physics, because no physics is possible without space and time, both of which are infinite.

The problem arises when we mix up science and spirituality, both of which have contradictory characteristics. Science is related to knowledge about worldly things for our possible use. This implies indulgence. Spirituality implies renunciation from worldly things. Only that way we can distance our concept of ownership and move towards universal feelings.

If someone says that he is indulging in science for the sake of knowledge only, then again it is a wrong statement. Knowledge is the opposite of action. We have knowledge about something only after we measure something at a designated instant. The object is not in the same temporal state when we use the information, but we have frozen the result of measurement at a particular instant and use it at subsequent times and call this knowledge. This proves our statement.

Hence we request again not to mix both, which shows ignorance and treat each separately, which only is wise.

Regards,

basudeba.

Dear Basudeba,

What is the ultimate goal of science in that case? Spirituality starts where science ends (at singularity) and this is what I am trying to convey.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Dear Sir,

Spirituality leads to renunciation. Science leads to indulgence. Hence both are contradictory. When you talk of "Spirituality starts where science ends", what it means is not singularity, but "renunciation starts where indulgence ends". Since end of indulgence is gradual with increase of renunciation, one can give up science as one moves towards spirituality. You must remember that science is "vignyaanam" - "vishishta gnyaanam" and not "gnyaanam". The word "vishishta" points to its special characteristic, which attracts towards worldly objects. At best you can equate singularity with "moksha" - the ultimate liberation, not spirituality.

If you read our comments below the Essays of Mr. B.N. Sreenath, and Mr. Peter A Jackson, you will realize that we are using many terms found in the Vedas. This shows that we are familiar with the Vedas, Braahmanas, Aaranyakas and Upanishads. We know that all translations available as on date are wrong. Hence we dot blame you, because you are following wrong descriptions. We only tried to prevent you from bringing it to international scientific community, because while in our country we ignore these, there is a great demand for these books abroad. In fact one publisher told us that there is so much demand that he is unable to meet the export orders. The people abroad - many of them - will see the fallacy or be misguided like the development of string theory from the Upanishad dictum of "tat sootram", which has been wrongly interpreted. It actually referred to the three fold structure of atoms - the center of mass with the nucleus, the orbits and the energy that binds these two. Without this energy, no particle will be stable. Hence sootra vaayu has been given due importance. However, this has been misunderstood in QM.

If you want to progress in spirituality, you must renounce not only science, but the world also, which includes love. Because love implies duality of the lover and the loved. Thus, it creates bondage. At the adwait stage, there is no duality - hence no love also.

Regards,

basudeba.

Dear Basudeba,

You are absolutely right about Singularity and Adwait and we are in total agreement, there is no more lover and the loved as they are one and the same at that state. I have not read any vedas or books but experienced this state in my life and wanted to convey to the scientific world that singularity is the ultimate reality and that it is right with in us. I am just connecting the dots of observed facts in cosmology to my self, black hole to death, singularity to immortality. According to me one who has realized this state becomes spiritual or conscious of one self and continues to live and share this truth with others out of love, which is the first and the foremost fundamental force that comes out of singularity and is the source of all existence.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Singularity is absolute and it is space-time itself.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Dear All,

As scientific community is trying to understand what gives particles their mass, I or Singularity or Conscience gives mass to the particles.

Love,

Sridattadev.