[deleted]
Malcom,
Examining your essay to the extent that I can (I'm merely an information systems analyst), our ideas do not seem to agree especially well. I approach all problems as a systems requirements analysis. As such, my conception of particle-wave state oscillation frequency must determine observed mass quantity and be independent of wave state oscillation frequency.
I require that a light wave's is perpetually in its wave state (until detected), thus having no rest mass. Conversely, more massive elements are more frequently manifested in their particle state, proportionately exhibiting a quantity of mass.
I also assert that particle state mass is some physical reconfiguration or at least redirection of wave state emission/propagation energy, converting kinetic energy to the potential energy of mass.
These requirements have no theoretical basis, as far as I know, or mathematical proof that I can provide: their manifestation would simply agree with a wide range of phenomena and may potentially allow integration between quantum and GR theories.
Jim