To further clarfiy my ideas...
I think black holes not only recycle matter that are already cosmic but they are also the main gravitational domains that 'create' new 'cosmic' mass-energy out of the infinite reservoir of motion that is manifested by the gravitational field.
In my essay, I presented the genesis formula that shows the relative three-dimensional translation of gravitational masses such as black holes.
The genesis formula clarifies the idea of motion transformations instead of the popular space-time transformations. The genesis formula illustrates the cosmic mass formation process and accounts for the CMBR.
It appears that no one else ever presented the idea of motion transformations and so it appears I am the originator of the idea. There was the classical velocity transformation idea. But my interpretation of mass-formation on account of the motion transformation effected by the three-dimensional gravitation process is original. (Hoyle, Burbidge, Narlikar, Barber, and the other self-creation cosmologists are not clear on the idea of motion transformations.)
I've sent letters to several people since the 1990s regarding this. But it has not been considered seriously. I am hoping that FQXi will be a catalyst towards the deeper investigation of the idea.
In relation to the essay contest, my idea is that the time dimension, space dimension, the instance of existence, and the substance of existence are each a continuum. In my view it is duration and motion that gets quantized.
I find the quantization of motion a more logical and rational idea. The idea of space-time transformations is too cluttered and too confusing to 'common sense' people.
To say that "things gravitate because there is the fundamental flow or motion towards gravitational centers" is easier to understand than to say that "things gravitate because of curved space around gravitational centers."
To say that the fundamental essence of mass and of energy is 'motion' is to me the most logical and rational. It is an especially simple and markedly fundamental view.
Rafael