Vladimir

I'm sorry, I put Tom's name instead of youts, I was thinking of your article and didn't realize that I had written the wrong name until after I sent it.

Guilford Robinson

Dear Steve,

Thank you for your Eurika explanation. I do not understand everything you describe for example what do you mean by "the fusion of light"? Another problem is that your English and spelling is often unclear for example "If we consider the lattices as our cosmological spheres, you shall see the no mass of the space due to the not rotation, and the no mass of light due to an other main sense than the gravitational stability, these the linearity is relevant differenciating the sense." May I suggest you write your interesting sphere ideas in an article with illustrations and publish it somewhere as a reference? Good luck to you Steve. By the way my name Tamari is similar to the Japanese word for "temari" a beautiful craft tradition making balls of strings defining spherical geometry.

Best wishes from Vladimir

Dear Guilford

I read your interesting essay in which you also posit a universal particle. Thanks for your comment- you make a heuristically helpful suggestion that node spin drags the space around it thus affecting the state of neighboring nodes. But then one has to think of a sub-ether between the nodes that are themselves supposed to define the ether. It is mind-boggling however we think of it! As I wrote in section 1.3 of my in my earlier 2005 Beautiful Universe paper on which my present fqxi paper is based, "This network of nodes creates space itself, so it is meaningless to speak of the shape of an individual node, neither of the material it is made of, or its behavior nor of any space between nodes." Be that as it may, the nodes may actually exist in a hidden universal set of 3 space dimensions. One can go on to speculate further...but to apply Popeye's expression to reductionism: "enufk is enufk!"

With best wishes from Vladimir

Vladimir,

Well argued, Vladimir.

"There are many versions of reality, depending on the person, animal or robot who experiences it."

My argument is the opposite of the above. I believe it is analogue and exists independent of beings who observe it. My details to support it are meager compared to yours.

Regards,

Jim Hoover

    • [deleted]

    • Post #40

    Hi Vladimir,

    Thanks it's nice.In fact I said that the lattices between spheres are probably universally linked with the evolution, thus of course the space without rot.between cosmological spheres change and evolve on the arrow of time and its entropy.

    For my publications, probably this year, at this momment I have some contacts in Belgium for the creation of the International Humanistic Sciences Center, I will create jobs thus of course I will be more professional.And of course I will publish many many pappers about my theory of Spherization a GUT TOE of Roating spinning spheres..........QUANTUM SPHERES.....COSMOLOGICAL SPHERES...UNIVERSAL SPHERE(unique of course this universe)the rotations and quantum number and their volumes with the finite number and it's ok.

    For the fusion m/hv it's simple the mass polarises the light simply ...synchro sorting.........mass, volumes, vel.of rot.......thus you shall understan,d why the number must rest finite for a concrete increase of mass due to this evolution, coded intrinsically in the gravitational stability.The density and mass changes thus also their rotations and the volumes probably, the number doesn't change .....hope I am clearer.

    Good luck also dear Vladimir, beautiful country the Japan, so creative this country and so skilling.

    Steve

    • [deleted]

    • Post #41

    Hi Vladimir,

    in a BEC light and space are the same , the gravity of course possesses a number finite for the entanglement but the add and multiplication is interesting and possible, see the work of Basudeba.I ask me one thing,the gravity has 1 the entanglement or a superimposing of entanglement , in fact it's difficult that ....the light and the space are the same, the gravity also but apparently due to evolution and biological or mineral complexification in 3D,this gravity has this number increased, or the other possibility is that the volumes of gravity increases....in all case it's a big unknown.The real combinations of spheres are so complexs but rest in 3D.

    Regards

    Steve

    • [deleted]

    • Post #42

    in fact if you see the light and its linearity and the mass and its gravitational stability....I see that as a male and a female , the light is for me the male and the mass the female in a simple point of vue....the fusion creates .....as a baby !

    The Universe is thus an act of pure love and we evolve, thus of course we improve and we optimize.In logic the others spheres bigger as BH ...towards the center .....is in the same logic or rotations and polarizations.

    Regards

    Steve

    • [deleted]

    • Post #43

    hope you are well in Japan, it's a big earthquake, it's sad .

    Take care

    Steve

      Dear Steve

      Thank you for your posts. Your mind is obviously full of ideas. You have to write them systematically and check spelling etc. Love makes the Universe go round! That by itself is worth all the physics there is and will be! I just experienced the worst earthquake in Tokyo but family and friends OK thank God. The Earth may be an (oblated if that is the word) sphere but it is irregular and has these troubles on the surface!!

      Be well and good luck with your IHSC project and physics papers. Vladimir

      • [deleted]

      • Post #45

      Dear Vladimir,

      I'm glad to see that you, your family and friends are OK. My prayers go out to the people of Japan.

      Sincerely, Ray Munroe

      Thanks James I will read your paper soon - things are a bit hectic here in Tokyo but safe. Cheers Vladimir

      Thanks Steve yes it is a big tragedy but we are OK in Tokyo itself. Best, Vladimir

      • [deleted]

      • Post #49

      Hi dr Cosmic Ray,Vladimir,all,

      Dear Vladimir, Indeed the surface is chaotic due to some human parameters....that's why the spherization is a harmonization in time space evolution.....that helps for the decrease of sufferings.

      Thanks for the IHSC Unified Sphere Institute.You know I have contacts in Belgium for the creation of this center.I will tell you the evolution, you know all are welcome for the complementarity for our fellowmen(alone we are nothing in fact).These persons say me that they are going to translate my ideas in numbers.Hope that will go,they seems humanistic and universal.Me and the economy it's the water and the fire.hihihi

      Best Regards and take care brothers humans,

      • [deleted]

      • Post #50

      Dear Vladimir,

      That goes ???

      Steve

      • [deleted]

      • Post #51

      Dear Vladimir,

      Best greetings,

      Thanks a lot for your email.

      We are happy that you and your wife are safe and sound.

      I downloaded your nice and great article and went through it.

      I'll read it again this evening.

      Best regards,

      Dr. Baker Abdel Munem

      Ph.D.(Mechanical Engineering), Ph.D.(Economics), Ph.D.(Political Science) .

      ===========

        Thank you Dr. Baker I hope you will enjoy the article.

        Best wishes from Vladimir

        • [deleted]

        • Post #53

        Salam alikoum,

        there the problem seems intriguing with the fusion.

        I am proposing that FQXI TRY TO FIND THE BEST SOLUTIONS FOR JAPAN , we could discuss here on the thread of Vladimir,the ideas of several are better than one,do you know what are the results, datas , reals of this catrastrophe?,.It's a serious problem.The sciences are there for that, find solutions....

        Regards

        Steve

        Thank you Steve perhaps fqxi may decide to create a special forum for its members to discuss world energy issues in view of what has happened. I feel this particular thread is not the right place to discuss it. Salam - Peace

        Vladimir

          Tommaso, thanks for your comments I have a feeling I responded to them but now I see I have not. Apologies. Yes of course Descartes' premises are very different from yours or mine but there are startling similarities - that everything including space (not just matter) is made of corpuscules. In my case the similarity is even more startling as he theorized that these corpuscles rotate.

          I raise my proverbial hat to whoever made those beautiful etchings to illustrate his ideas - they had no computer graphic software as I benefited from or programmed graphics as in your case.

          The node states in my theory have three aspects 1) a node may or may not rotate 2) the rate of rotation can have any positive value but the angular momentum is in units of (h) 3) a node rotates at any spherical angle 4)the chirality of node rotation (whether it is clockwise or counterclockwise) is of critical importance.

          My own state in Tokyo after the recent earthquake is stable after a week with my mind in a whirl.