• [deleted]

  • Post #40

Hi Vladimir,

Thanks it's nice.In fact I said that the lattices between spheres are probably universally linked with the evolution, thus of course the space without rot.between cosmological spheres change and evolve on the arrow of time and its entropy.

For my publications, probably this year, at this momment I have some contacts in Belgium for the creation of the International Humanistic Sciences Center, I will create jobs thus of course I will be more professional.And of course I will publish many many pappers about my theory of Spherization a GUT TOE of Roating spinning spheres..........QUANTUM SPHERES.....COSMOLOGICAL SPHERES...UNIVERSAL SPHERE(unique of course this universe)the rotations and quantum number and their volumes with the finite number and it's ok.

For the fusion m/hv it's simple the mass polarises the light simply ...synchro sorting.........mass, volumes, vel.of rot.......thus you shall understan,d why the number must rest finite for a concrete increase of mass due to this evolution, coded intrinsically in the gravitational stability.The density and mass changes thus also their rotations and the volumes probably, the number doesn't change .....hope I am clearer.

Good luck also dear Vladimir, beautiful country the Japan, so creative this country and so skilling.

Steve

  • [deleted]

  • Post #41

Hi Vladimir,

in a BEC light and space are the same , the gravity of course possesses a number finite for the entanglement but the add and multiplication is interesting and possible, see the work of Basudeba.I ask me one thing,the gravity has 1 the entanglement or a superimposing of entanglement , in fact it's difficult that ....the light and the space are the same, the gravity also but apparently due to evolution and biological or mineral complexification in 3D,this gravity has this number increased, or the other possibility is that the volumes of gravity increases....in all case it's a big unknown.The real combinations of spheres are so complexs but rest in 3D.

Regards

Steve

  • [deleted]

  • Post #42

in fact if you see the light and its linearity and the mass and its gravitational stability....I see that as a male and a female , the light is for me the male and the mass the female in a simple point of vue....the fusion creates .....as a baby !

The Universe is thus an act of pure love and we evolve, thus of course we improve and we optimize.In logic the others spheres bigger as BH ...towards the center .....is in the same logic or rotations and polarizations.

Regards

Steve

  • [deleted]

  • Post #43

hope you are well in Japan, it's a big earthquake, it's sad .

Take care

Steve

    Dear Steve

    Thank you for your posts. Your mind is obviously full of ideas. You have to write them systematically and check spelling etc. Love makes the Universe go round! That by itself is worth all the physics there is and will be! I just experienced the worst earthquake in Tokyo but family and friends OK thank God. The Earth may be an (oblated if that is the word) sphere but it is irregular and has these troubles on the surface!!

    Be well and good luck with your IHSC project and physics papers. Vladimir

    • [deleted]

    • Post #45

    Dear Vladimir,

    I'm glad to see that you, your family and friends are OK. My prayers go out to the people of Japan.

    Sincerely, Ray Munroe

    Thanks James I will read your paper soon - things are a bit hectic here in Tokyo but safe. Cheers Vladimir

    Thanks Steve yes it is a big tragedy but we are OK in Tokyo itself. Best, Vladimir

    • [deleted]

    • Post #49

    Hi dr Cosmic Ray,Vladimir,all,

    Dear Vladimir, Indeed the surface is chaotic due to some human parameters....that's why the spherization is a harmonization in time space evolution.....that helps for the decrease of sufferings.

    Thanks for the IHSC Unified Sphere Institute.You know I have contacts in Belgium for the creation of this center.I will tell you the evolution, you know all are welcome for the complementarity for our fellowmen(alone we are nothing in fact).These persons say me that they are going to translate my ideas in numbers.Hope that will go,they seems humanistic and universal.Me and the economy it's the water and the fire.hihihi

    Best Regards and take care brothers humans,

    • [deleted]

    • Post #50

    Dear Vladimir,

    That goes ???

    Steve

    • [deleted]

    • Post #51

    Dear Vladimir,

    Best greetings,

    Thanks a lot for your email.

    We are happy that you and your wife are safe and sound.

    I downloaded your nice and great article and went through it.

    I'll read it again this evening.

    Best regards,

    Dr. Baker Abdel Munem

    Ph.D.(Mechanical Engineering), Ph.D.(Economics), Ph.D.(Political Science) .

    ===========

      Thank you Dr. Baker I hope you will enjoy the article.

      Best wishes from Vladimir

      • [deleted]

      • Post #53

      Salam alikoum,

      there the problem seems intriguing with the fusion.

      I am proposing that FQXI TRY TO FIND THE BEST SOLUTIONS FOR JAPAN , we could discuss here on the thread of Vladimir,the ideas of several are better than one,do you know what are the results, datas , reals of this catrastrophe?,.It's a serious problem.The sciences are there for that, find solutions....

      Regards

      Steve

      Thank you Steve perhaps fqxi may decide to create a special forum for its members to discuss world energy issues in view of what has happened. I feel this particular thread is not the right place to discuss it. Salam - Peace

      Vladimir

        Tommaso, thanks for your comments I have a feeling I responded to them but now I see I have not. Apologies. Yes of course Descartes' premises are very different from yours or mine but there are startling similarities - that everything including space (not just matter) is made of corpuscules. In my case the similarity is even more startling as he theorized that these corpuscles rotate.

        I raise my proverbial hat to whoever made those beautiful etchings to illustrate his ideas - they had no computer graphic software as I benefited from or programmed graphics as in your case.

        The node states in my theory have three aspects 1) a node may or may not rotate 2) the rate of rotation can have any positive value but the angular momentum is in units of (h) 3) a node rotates at any spherical angle 4)the chirality of node rotation (whether it is clockwise or counterclockwise) is of critical importance.

        My own state in Tokyo after the recent earthquake is stable after a week with my mind in a whirl.

        • [deleted]

        • Post #56

        Indeed you are right. It's a good idea, we could extrapolate models, solutions,improvements...in all case the solutions exist.

        it's important the cooling ...all countries must help quickly.It's essential.I don't understand how it's possible.

        Take care

        Steve

        • [deleted]

        • Post #57

        good luck also for the final,

        Steve

        Dear Vladimir,

        Congratulations on your dedication to the competition and your much deserved top 35 placing. I have a bugging question for you, which I've also posed to all the potential prize winners btw:

        Q: Coulomb's Law of electrostatics was modelled by Maxwell by mechanical means after his mathematical deductions as an added verification (thanks for that bit of info Edwin), which I highly admire. To me, this gives his equation some substance. I have a problem with the laws of gravity though, especially the mathematical representation that "every object attracts every other object equally in all directions." The 'fabric' of spacetime model of gravity doesn't lend itself to explain the law of electrostatics. Coulomb's law denotes two types of matter, one 'charged' positive and the opposite type 'charged' negative. An Archimedes screw model for the graviton can explain -both- the gravity law and the electrostatic law, whilst the 'fabric' of spacetime can't. Doesn't this by definition make the helical screw model better than than anything else that has been suggested for the mechanism of the gravity force?? Otherwise the unification of all the forces is an impossiblity imo. Do you have an opinion on my analysis at all?

        Best wishes,

        Alan

          Dear Alan

          Thanks for your good wishes. I am very gratified that so many good and original thinkers were able to read my speculations..and of course they are nothing but speculations. If Nature is kind enough to act the way I have concluded it does (with dipolar building blocks capable of accounting for both gravity and electrostatics) I will be very happy - but it may well not! The pleasure of participation and learning here not ratings per se is what matters.

          I am very interested in Maxwell's mechanical models and have been looking for source material but could only find the diagram I reprinted in my essay, and without explanation of what it means exactly. I will appreciate it if you can provide Edwin's reference.

          Some weeks ago I had already read your idea about an Archimedes screw interpretation of the particle-wave duality. It is very clever the axis of the screw would be a vector and the helical structure the wave. I had commented about this in one of the discussions here but could not find my comment again! In it I said that - judging from the nice animation you made of the particle being driven by the screw - this may be a version of de Broglie's idea of a pilot wave associated with a point particle. In the figure illustrating electromagnetic propagation in my original 2005 Beautiful Universe paper on which my present fqxi paper is based, I have suggested how a circularly polarized wave would move with the axes of the nodes rotating in place to create a helical pattern - I feel there is no need for a separate 'mechanism' to create this motion as the screw does in your model. I will read your paper again.

          Best wishes from Vladimir