Now I want to cut the thing up and make it 3 dimensional.
Its really bugging me. The output reality can't just be a sub set of the uni-temporal source reality. So its "floating there in limbo", on another level, part of the source reality but also not, seemingly superposed but not. Its incongruent.!! I don't think conventional maths will allow me to put a 4 space-time dimensions inside a 3 dimensional space,even if its only a small space-time and not a whole universe.
So IS IT more helpful to consider it as separate in the representation or not? As it isn't actually a 4 dimensional but only the fabricated illusion of things in 4 dimensional space, which exists -within- the 3 dimensional uni-temporal space.
1. output has 4 dimensions at least IE 3n plus 1. Re the source; it depends upon how its thought about/described but might be considered a sequence of 3 dimensions. So they are -different co-existing spaces-. They might seem to be superposed however it seems to me that only the raw data is spread over the source reality not the fabricated output from it. Though that also has to be within the source reality because there is no where else for it to exist.
2.output is formed from data that has come from different iterations in the sequence. (Shown near QM wavefunction on latest version of the digram.) via the data pool and processing.) But is formed wholly from the data that is received from the uni-temporal reality and is processed by the organism or mechanism or process that exists wholly within the uni-temporal reality.
3.Output isn't just a kind of the same thing or a different arrangement or place but its fundamentally different. I think this must have something to do with non locality. Where things are and what is influencing them is in that uni-temporal non space-time "ahead" of the space-time present.And as it continues unobserved across the changing sequence of those non space-time arrangements of the universe.
4. The problem representing this is that there are two different kinds of things being considered one is the stuff..fermions, matter and media the other is data primarily for us EM data and sound but could include other potential input. The data pool data , output manifestations incorporating data and records storage of data give a past, present and future. But input to that system is also required for partial non determinism and that comes from the ongoing changes in the foundational source reality which has an open future.
5.How the data is considered will affect how it is represented. It is both the carrier "thing" and the information content. The carrier has to be ultimately foundational but the product of the data is something else. I don't think it can be broken down into a foundational reality. It is what it is because of how it is put together and doesn't have any independent existence that can be comprehended through reductionism. Like that short coloured barn pole. It isn't that except when its manifestation is fabricated by the observer. The manifestation can't be broken down in the same way as pole atomic structured object can. Which makes me want to keep the output separate from the source reality.
Image in it floating on another level for now.
I realise I need to learn some more about sets and category theory. It seems that it is a pretty isolated stand alone subject which I might be able to tackle. Have found some things to read. Any suggestions on the easiest and quickest guide to the subject "Category theory for dummies" or something would be appreciated. Though this framework is rather philosophical right now, because the whole purpose is to have an explanatory model that explains, it does open up the possibility of being developed or extended into something more mathematical.
Yes it does seem to include a great big uncountable set. Is that a problem or just unusual?
