Dear Shan Gao,
I can show this essay is meaningless and erroneous. The idea of essay is very simple: First Shan Goa saw the formula c=Lp/Tp in the textbook, that means that the speed c have to do something with Planck distance Lp and Planck time Tp, and all his article is a game around this formula. Let us look how Shan Gao proves the invariance of speed of light: Since c is the maximum signal speed in every inertial frame, the speed of the signal in S' can only be equal to c. It is first senseless proposition. Then he wrote: This result also means that when the signal moves in the x direction with speed c in the inertial frame S, its speed will be also c in the inertial frame S with a velocity in the x direction relative to S'. Since the inertial frames S and S' are arbitrary, we can reach the conclusion that if a signal moves with the speed c in an inertial frame, it will also move with the same speed c in all other inertial frames. This proves the invariance of speed c. In other words, Shan Gao wrote that since the signal moves at c in all frames, it proves the invariance of speed c. In fact, it proves nothing and is senseless.
Further, Shan Gao wrote: ''To sum up, I have argued that the MOIST postulate leads to the existence of a maximum signal speed''. In other words, Shan Gao wrote that, since c is the maximum signal speed in every inertial frame, and c is connected to Planck distance, the MOIST postulate leads to the existence of a maximum signal speed". It is a senseless proposition that proves nothing.
I can demonstrate that all Shan Gao's papers are senseless and contain zero useful information - it is a collection of empty papers only.
Imagine, he published about 9 identical papers which contains the same idea about that the motion of particles is not classical, but discontinuous. It is not a new idea, all physics textbooks tell us that quantum particles have neither trajectories nor classical motion, and therefore their wavefunctions also do not describe classical motion. However, all his 9 papers contains this idea only.
Let us analyze his paper Everyone can understand quantum mechanics He wrote some words about Bohr, Einstein, Bohm, Everett, then about that motion is not continuous but discontinuous. And it is all the paper! Thus, paper contain zero new useful information.
Let us analyze another Gao's paper What quantum mechanics describes is discontinuous motion This paper describes the same idea: the motion of particles is not continuous, but discontinuous. Hence, this paper contains zero useful information.
God Does Play Dice With the Universe This paper discribes the same idea:the motion of particles is not continuous, but discontinuous.
Since the particle's motion is not classical, it is clear that his wavefunction also do not describe classical motion. However, Shan Gao published 4 papers about it, with zero new information. I stop here because I do not have time, but you can check the rest of Shan Gao's papers and see that all his papers repeats the same information; the most of his papers contain zero new usefull information and are senseless.
Yours,
Abramovich
