Hole Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics by Constantin Zaharia Leshan

Dear Readers,

Nobody found any errors in Hole Vacuum theory; This theory show consistence with experiments and observations:

1) The properties of vacuum holes coincide with the properties of gravity. According to theory a hole does not have the time and length because there is nothing outside of the Universe - no space, no time, no matter. Consequently if we increase the concentration of holes in spacetime then the time dilation and length contraction effects gradually must appear because in the limiting case, when space consists of holes only, the time and length would no longer exist. It is a logical deduction - since holes do not have length and time then near the source of holes must appear the time dilation and length contraction effects. The gravitational time dilation effect was proven experimentally using atomic clocks, therefore my theory show consistence with experiments and observations. In fact, the hole is the only ''particle'' in physics able to explain the gravitational time dilation and length contraction by its properties only. Since holes are able to explain gravity and quantum phenomena in the same model therefore it may indicate that Hole Theory may be the true theory of gravity.

2) According to hole theory, the appearance of holes led to ''vibration'' of particles and zero point energy. Liquid helium-4 remains liquid at atmospheric pressure even at absolute zero because holes cause its atoms to randomly vibrate. You see, Hole Theory shows consistence with experiments and observations. Also you can find other proofs in my essay and other my papers.

We can prove the existence of holes experimentally using two atomic clocks: if near the source of holes we detect time dilation then it is a proof that holes really exist. Hole Theory predicts also the fast fluctuation of geometry at small scales due to appearance of holes. Hole Theory predicts that we can increase De Broglie wavelength by increasing the number of holes acting in unison.

Thus, we can check experimentally the Hole theory.

Constantin

Dr. Egal,

OK, since I attacked a lot of the essays in this contest therefore some offended scientists like Dr. Egals tries to find errors in my theory. You see, the attack is the best method to force other scientists to analyze my theory. Welcome Dr. Egal to the Hole Vacuum theory.

''you cannot create a theory in isolation''. Please show me an example of the rigorous theory in this contest. I say that I created this theory in isolation to argue why I cannot demonstrate superluminal teleportation and the complete theory of quantum mechanics. Besides, the complete quantum mechanics cannot fit in the essay with 25000 characters.

''I don't know how you jump from edges to holes, but the whole is wrong. Compact spaces are spaces that can be covered with finite volumes yet they do not need to have an edge or border because you can approach asymptotically to it without never reaching the border such as in open spaces, e.g. the interval (0,1), finitely enclosed length with no edges''

First you must try to understand how I jump from edges to holes before making the unproven declarations ''the whole is wrong''. You don't observe holes because you use mathematical abstractions - I agree, it is very difficult to find holes in your abstract mathematical representations. In my theory you also can approach asymptotically to hole without never reaching the border (hole); My finite in volume Universe yet do not need to have a macroscopic edge and you may travel an infinite path without reaching any border because spacetime is curved.

Imagine the first micro-seconds of expansion of the Universe. The Universe is very small and therefore FINITE in volume. Outside of the expanding Universe is nothing - no matter, no space, no time, and no length. In fact, the Universe is an object suspended in the absolute void (hole). In other words, a hole is a void or the ''space'' where every two points coincide because the hole does not have extent and time. Thus, every two points placed on the external surface of the Universe coincide because a hole does not have extent. Therefore the external surface of the Universe collapses to a point. In other words, the Universe looks as a point ''from the outside''. The spacetime in the Universe is curved back to itself; In other words, you can travel an infinite path on straight line and you'll never see any macroscopic border. Meanwhile I shown above that the Universe finite in volume must have a border in form of the point; Thus the finite in volume Universe must have at least one border in form of a point, it is a hole. According to cosmological principle this border can exist in form of ubiquitous virtual holes only. In simple terms, the cosmological principle says: The universe is homogeneous and isotropic. This means there is no preferred observing position in the universe and you see no difference in the structure of the universe as you look in different directions. If a border exist in a single place it would violate the cosmological principle therefore holes must exist in every point of the Universe. Therefore, the Universe have an edge in form of the ubiquitous holes which appear and disappear in every point of the Universe.

If you are not happy with above introduction of vacuum holes then I can offer you another way. Imagine the quantized spacetime consisting of fluctuating spatial atoms dV which appear and disappear. When the spatial atom disappears it creates a vacant place which does not contain spacetime - a hole in spacetime. What can appear in place of dV? If spatial atoms dV exist then dV must appear and disappear continually. If you forbid the fluctuation of dV you get the ether forbidden by Michelson- Morley experiment. I can demonstrate you that dV cannot move continually, the must jump only. To move continually, the macroscopic object need the spacetime continuum. However, since dV do not have the background continuum then dV can move by jumping only. However, since dV jumps and disappear.

''I don't know how you jump from edges to holes'' the edge of the Universe is another name of holes. The Universe is the matter; a hole is the edge of the Universe because it does not contain matter or spacetime, a hole is not a part of the material Universe.

''How do you jump from holes to discontinuity? You have to be mathematically precise, if the dimension is no smaller than 3 then the whole is still topologically connected and continuos in this sense as you can find a path from anywhere to anywhere from the space (without the holes)''.

First let us define the notion of continuous and discontinuous. The object is continuous if every two points on its surface have the similar properties. The object is discontinuous if it is not continuous and we can find the points where its matter is absent. For example the air is not discontinuous because it is made of gas atoms, molecules and void between them. Since we can find the void between air' atoms/molecules then it is a proof that air is discontinuous. Your computer is discontinuous because it is made of atoms separated by the void. All matter is discontinuous because it is made of particles separated by the void. In fact the entire Universe is discontinuous because it is made of discrete particles separated by the void. The spacetime with holes is discontinuous because it is made of spatial atoms separated by the void (holes). (text continues below)

Dr. Egal,

OK, since I attacked a lot of the essays in this contest therefore some offended scientists like Dr. Egals tries to find errors in my theory. You see, the attack is the best method to force other scientists to analyze my theory. Welcome Dr. Egal to the Hole Vacuum theory.

''you cannot create a theory in isolation''. Please show me an example of the rigorous theory in this contest. I say that I created this theory in isolation to argue why I cannot demonstrate superluminal teleportation and the complete theory of quantum mechanics. Besides, the complete quantum mechanics cannot fit in the essay with 25000 characters.

''I don't know how you jump from edges to holes, but the whole is wrong. Compact spaces are spaces that can be covered with finite volumes yet they do not need to have an edge or border because you can approach asymptotically to it without never reaching the border such as in open spaces, e.g. the interval (0,1), finitely enclosed length with no edges''

First you must try to understand how I jump from edges to holes before making the unproven declarations ''the whole is wrong''. You don't observe holes because you use mathematical abstractions - I agree, it is very difficult to find holes in your abstract mathematical representations. In my theory you also can approach asymptotically to hole without never reaching the border (hole); My finite in volume Universe yet do not need to have a macroscopic edge and you may travel an infinite path without reaching any border because spacetime is curved.

Imagine the first micro-seconds of expansion of the Universe. The Universe is very small and therefore FINITE in volume. Outside of the expanding Universe is nothing - no matter, no space, no time, and no length. In fact, the Universe is an object suspended in the absolute void (hole). In other words, a hole is a void or the ''space'' where every two points coincide because the hole does not have extent and time. Thus, every two points placed on the external surface of the Universe coincide because a hole does not have extent. Therefore the external surface of the Universe collapses to a point. In other words, the Universe looks as a point ''from the outside''. The spacetime in the Universe is curved back to itself; In other words, you can travel an infinite path on straight line and you'll never see any macroscopic border. Meanwhile I shown above that the Universe finite in volume must have a border in form of the point; Thus the finite in volume Universe must have at least one border in form of a point, it is a hole. According to cosmological principle this border can exist in form of ubiquitous virtual holes only. In simple terms, the cosmological principle says: The universe is homogeneous and isotropic. This means there is no preferred observing position in the universe and you see no difference in the structure of the universe as you look in different directions. If a border exist in a single place it would violate the cosmological principle therefore holes must exist in every point of the Universe. Therefore, the Universe have an edge in form of the ubiquitous holes which appear and disappear in every point of the Universe.

If you are not happy with above introduction of vacuum holes then I can offer you another way. Imagine the quantized spacetime consisting of fluctuating spatial atoms dV which appear and disappear. When the spatial atom disappears it creates a vacant place which does not contain spacetime - a hole in spacetime. What can appear in place of dV? If spatial atoms dV exist then dV must appear and disappear continually. If you forbid the fluctuation of dV you get the ether forbidden by Michelson- Morley experiment. I can demonstrate you that dV cannot move continually, the must jump only. To move continually, the macroscopic object need the spacetime continuum. However, since dV do not have the background continuum then dV can move by jumping only. However, since dV jumps and disappear.

''I don't know how you jump from edges to holes'' the edge of the Universe is another name of holes. The Universe is the matter; a hole is the edge of the Universe because it does not contain matter or spacetime, a hole is not a part of the material Universe.

''How do you jump from holes to discontinuity? You have to be mathematically precise, if the dimension is no smaller than 3 then the whole is still topologically connected and continuos in this sense as you can find a path from anywhere to anywhere from the space (without the holes)''.

First let us define the notion of continuous and discontinuous. The object is continuous if every two points on its surface have the similar properties. The object is discontinuous if it is not continuous and we can find the points where its matter is absent. For example the air is not discontinuous because it is made of gas atoms, molecules and void between them. Since we can find the void between air' atoms/molecules then it is a proof that air is discontinuous. Your computer is discontinuous because it is made of atoms separated by the void. All matter is discontinuous because it is made of particles separated by the void. In fact the entire Universe is discontinuous because it is made of discrete particles separated by the void. The spacetime with holes is discontinuous because it is made of spatial atoms separated by the void (holes). (text continues below)

''you also think that math is junk'' Yes, the mathematics is a blind tool that must follow the physics. About 70 percents of mathematical papers in Physics are wrong. The SM is wrong because it is a mathematical model only. I found important logical flaws in the SM and I'll publish it soon. The future physics will be based on physical reasoning and vacuum holes. I can develop and prove the hole theory experimentally without using mathematical models. I'll show even teleportation experimentally without using mathematical models. You can use the mathematical models to save your erroneous SM.

''As I read, I understand you think others are not qualified to evaluate essays but you do''. The majority rated ''good'' for some leading essays but I found important flaws there. It is a proof that the majority is not qualified to rate the scientific essays. My essay was rated by ''1'' but they don't found any error in my theory - It means the majority is not qualified to rate the scientific essays. I agree that I'm not qualified to evaluate mathematics but I can rate essays logically using physics reasoning. I rated only the few essays where I found errors or advantages.

Finally, I can prove the existence of holes experimentally:

1) Since holes do not have extent and time therefore the increasing of hole concentration lead to length contraction and time dilation. Thus we can prove the existence of holes by using two atomic clocks. We place first clock near the source of holes and another clock is a control clock. If we detect the time dilation near the source of holes it is a proof that holes really exist. According to Hole theory, vacuum holes appear when particles disappear or move with acceleration. For example holes appear at particle decays, inelastic scattering, and motion of bodies with acceleration.

Thus, I can prove the existence of holes experimentally. Remember, you'll NEVER find errors in Hole Theory. In nearest future all physics will be based on Hole Vacuum theory. I found errors in your theory but you don't found any errors in Hole Theory.

Constantin

Egal,

I found a flaw in you reasoning, you write: ''Just to show you that you cannot create a theory in isolation because you will lack of all knowledge to come up with something serious I will attack one of your many flaws. You say: "Since the Universe has a finite volume, it must have the edges (holes)." I don't know how you jump from edges to holes, but the whole is wrong. Compact spaces are spaces that can be covered with finite volumes yet they do not need to have an edge or border because you can approach asymptotically to it without never reaching the border such as in open spaces, e.g. the interval (0,1), finitely enclosed length with no edges''

In other words, you have a mathematical model of continuous compact space without borders; And you are trying to prove that my discontinuous space is wrong just because your mathematical model is continuous and without borders? It is the absurd and senseless statement! In the same way you may try to prove the contrary: continuous space is wrong because your mathematical model is discontinuous. In general, it is absurd to prove the nature of spacetime using mathematical models. Please try to introduce holes in your mathematical model and then borders may appear in your model.

''You lack of basic knowledge of mathematical topology''

Note, that my vacuum holes are NOT topological defects therefore my spacetime with holes has nothing to do with your topological theories. Vacuum holes have totally different properties in comparison with topological defects. Therefore it is absurd to compare your topological theory with my discontinuous spacetime. First try to prove that vacuum holes are topological defects; If you'll prove that holes are topological defects, then you may write about ''lack of basic knowledge of mathematical topology''. My theory has nothing to do with the present topological theories because these theories do not consider holes in spacetime.

Thus, I found a logical flaw in your reasoning: it is absurd to prove that the discontinuous space is wrong just because you have a continuous mathematical model without borders. In general, it is absurd to prove the nature of spacetime using mathematical models of spacetime. For example, please try to prove that spatial atoms does not exist using your mathematical model.

To prove my reasoning wrong please show me an example of physical object finite in volume without borders. All finite in volume objects have borders! Therefore the finite Universe also must have a border at least in form of a point. And the border is another name for vacuum holes because a hole is not a part of the material Universe. The spacetime with holes is discontinuous because a hole is the absence of spacetime. Thus, spacetime is fundamentally discontinuous and have holes because Universe is finite.

If you are not happy with above introduction of vacuum holes then I can offer you another way. Imagine the quantized spacetime consisting of fluctuating spatial atoms dV which appear and disappear. When the spatial atom disappears it creates a vacant place which does not contain spacetime - a hole in spacetime.

You'll NEVER find errors in this theory. Since holes are able to explain gravity, inertia, mass and quantum phenomena in the same model, it is the best proof that the Universe is fundamentally discontinuous.

Constantin

Dear Readers,

All knowledge claims should be open to rational criticism. And so many things need criticism as that is the only way innovation will once again enter these fields and allow mankind to progress. Many theories in physics still require clarification and the criticism allows us to save the money and research time by elimination of false theories. Too many so-called scientists refuse to admit that their precious theory might be wrong and they go so far as to fudge the results of their experiments. These people are not scientists at all.

In my view, the essay contest is a scientific event where scientists are learning about, and criticizing, each others' work. It helps us to verify true theories and to falsify false theories. However some scientists like ''egal'' are afraid of criticism, and they try to take revenge and insult. He wrote: ''you will have to live the rest of your life with what you have written everywhere in this contest''. You see, ''egal'' wants revenge for my critisizm. Meanwhile I can demonstrate that all his claims are wrong (below).

I know that some scientists consider my theory wrong and vice versa, I consider some theories wrong in this contest. Hence, let's analyze each others' work without insults and revenge.

Constantin