19 days later

Guilford

I can't believe I'm the first posting! I was intruigued by your ideas, though I'm not a mathematician, you also seemed to have a good handle on the important conceptual elements.

I hope you may be interested in reading mine, with the odd conceptual parallel before a major divergence where I move to just logic and empiricism, but do get an extraordinary result, that needs some maths.

I hope you can read it, understand it, and comments.

best wishes

peter

5 days later

Guildford

Thanks for your response in my string. I'm impressed by your perception, where many initially struggle, combined with ability in maths I'll never possess, and by the conceptual similarities of our thesese. The most remarkable thing is how low yours is! so prepare for a boost.

One issue was undoubtedly the lack of Abstract here - it seems you should have bothered to send it again!

There are a number of other good consistent essays, including Klingman, Regaza, Parry, Castel, Tamari etc etc (see string) I think you should definately read and score Constantinos Regazas important one, as you have a handle on maths.

Very best of luck

Peter

Dear Guilford

I second Peter's opinion of your paper. Your a priori hypothesis of a universal particle [p] that defines local density is very similar to my lattice node suggestion. You treat of it quantitatively using the Planck units whilst I mostly suggest my concepts qualitatively. I shall read your analysis carefully I am sure I will learn a thing or two from you!

With best wishes

Vladimir

Dear Guilford Robinson,

It is true that Einstein's equations agree with Newton's at low velocities but it is not true that QG and GR will reduce to each other.Because QG field is the basic field from which you can derive the GR (gravitational field) but not QG from GR.That is,you can reduce QG to GR but not the opposite.How this is done,you will find it in my article in the web-link that I have mentioned in my essay.In the QG field both QM and GR(in its distorted form) are combined.GR in its distorted form because in the QG field gravity varies exponentially;where as gravity (acceleration)remains uniform in GR.Thus GR is distorted in QG.So QG is the reality from which GR can be deduced.

Today I went thro' your article and surprised to see in your last para that my article started from where your article ended.Your endeavour to explain all fundamental concepts of physics from a single basic concept is really stonishing

Good luck and best regards.

Sreenath B N.