Is Reality Digital or Analog? by Dante Hugo Barbis

Very imginative this thought experiment, it helps to understand the things tahat we can not see, however, they exists

Edgard

Thanks a lot for your comments.

Dante

Excelent!

Federico,

Thank you

Dante

This is a wonderful, understandable and very well described essay, Thank you Dante for sharing this and help us understand the world that we cannot see but we know it is there.

Thanks to you Octavio for your words,

Dante

Hi Dante,

I found your essay very imaginative and who knows that one day we could see all of this.

Hi Dante, this is fantastic, congratulations

Wonderful!!!

Dante

Great fun, good visualisation. You should be higher than you are. I hope you'll read and score mine too,http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/803 indeed you may also enjoy this including some logical extensions; http://vixra.org/abs/1102.0016 do give me any views.

Thanks

Very best of luck

Peter

Dante

Although I am not familiar with cosmology, I found your essay very interesting.

Congratulation.

Peter,

I just rated your essay, I enjoy it.

Dante

Dante, this is incredible! My husband and I have read and reread it and it's amazing at what we have learned. Good luck and keep up the very good work.

Dear Dante,

I was pleasantly surprised to come across your essay. The imagery and description of the shrinking capsule grabbed my attention. But it is the motion created by your three basic particles that really seems interesting. I have been researching whether a standard particle has internal motion and how it could be described. I hope you have a chance to read my essay. It may seem much different than yours but it has a common goal of analyzing internal particle motion.

Thank you for your imaginative way of looking at such tiny aspects of nature and pondering what could be there.

Kind regards, Russell Jurgensen

Dear Dante,

Energy quanta are a think of the past! We need "A World Without Quanta"! And you can make that critical difference to help bring it about. Cast your approval for a world that makes sense and bring this essay out of the cusp of 'being or not being'! The results are deeply significant and totally iconoclastic. But we need to bring this essay to the 'church' on time! You among others will be better for it!

All the best,

Constantinos

Dear Russell,

I read yuor interesting essay. I am working on describe an mechanical model for the most basic particles must exist. I just describe the motion of the 3 more basics particles I can imagine. The paper extension do not permit to me going on the probably cause for the electron and the bigest particles motion. Any way, I am going to complete this essay, by my own, including electron, proton and neutron spins and also how the EM waves must be build up from the electric and magnetic fields changes.

Best regards,

Dante

Thanks for yours words Constantinos. I am working on answer some questions like a photon "without mass" just to explain how a EM signal can go to infinity carry info (signal) that means carry energy too.

Nobody knows how an electron is, and how the electric charge is. I am trying to do a mechanical model about the most basics particles in the Universe and how they interacts.

Best regards,

Dante

Dear Mr Barbis

When reading your article, I obtain some ideas. You use thought experiment with metal capsule. Zeilinger differently proposes that children should have computer games with use of quantum mechanics so that they can get feeling of quantum mechanics. But I will maybe use one thought experiment with small measurement device, which can measure all quantum information and then processes it...

You wrote that electron or any particles are balls. Balls means space, but I think that space at very microscopic space does not exist. Nets of elementary particles only create this space. This can be also visible from my article

http://vixra.org/pdf/1103.0025v1.pdf

I claim that physics is quantized. But, I claim that elementary particles are statistical combinations of 0 and 1 Planck's mass (approximately said). Elementary particles are also nodes of space-time net.

But, I have not found only one in this contest who cited Zeilinger-Brukner (Barbour, Gibbs), whose claim that information in a very small volume is finite. Probably we have different tastes for physical theories.

So there fails still your opinion whether information on a small piece of space is finite or infinite, although your space-time is infinite. Your balls make it infinite.

p.s.

My articles are also

http://www.fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/571

http://vixra.org/pdf/1012.0006v3.pdf

Regards

Dear Dante

I enjoyed reading your wonderful story/essay. It is as imaginative and interesting as the fqxi essay by J Mäkelä about a visit to Newton. Your plot reminded me of the Fantastic Voyage movies of humans who become miniature and explore the cells of the human body. Your suggestion of two different particles one attractive and one repulsive is insightful. I have followed a different approach in my essay and in my earlier 2005 Beautiful Universe paper on which it is based, whereby one type of ether particle has +- magnet-like properties...there are other differences between our particles, for example in my case they only have angular not linear momentum, and they do not bounce against one another. But we both agree that at the most basic level of the Universe attraction/repulsion play an essential role.

Best wishes from Vladimir