Hacking Reality Code by Raymond Aschheim

still computing, any real physical sense.

Pay attention dear all rationalists, they are going to invent a time machine with tachyons because they have received a Higgs information of pseudo gravity which turns, a string which turns also and of course a tensor with infinities there and after a kind of super extradimensions for travel in time, indeed we must return at home.Extradimensions no but frankly and what after a BH is a door between periods also at all scales , no but frankly.It is not sciences that but sciences fiction, sorry, just sciences fiction, a kind of sciences for non scientists.A kind of pseudo extrapolations becoming of confusions, numerous, be sure.No but frankly , I must say you that we have our universal laws , irreversibilities, constants,....and these foundamentals are rational, deterministic and logic at all scales in 3D. i AM SORRY BUT YOU DO NOT RESPECT THE ENTROPY, ITS DISTRIBUTION IN COOLING, YOU CONFOUND THE PHYSICALITY AND YOUR IRRATONALITIES.You must really buy better books, they exist!I invite you to read and learn even the works of Ecard about the pure rationality, but perhaps you prefer infinite cantor sets without real sense......our physicality is deterministic dear thinkers and in 3D.

R Q ....C ....please use correctly the distribution of numbers inside the physicality.

FOCUS ON RATIONALITIES IF IT IS POSSIBLE please ...the sciences must be precisce, exact !!!

Steve

Dear Ray,

Thank you for explaining your ideas. You really have looked closely into the geometrical aspect of an E8 TOE.

Your analysis includes complex numbers, but a single E8 has strictly real representations. Lubos Motl "beat me up" over this point (and a TOE needs complex numbers to explain CP symmetry violation). As such, I don't think that a "normal" E8 is good enough, but rather we should look at an H4xH4* (where the fermions should be in a single 120-plet so we don't have 192 fermionic degrees-of-freedom) or an E8xE8*~SO(32) (which now has 240 fermionic degrees-of-freedom - enough for a 3-fold triality generational symmetry, a 4-fold quartality color symmetry, a 5-fold pentality "handedness" symmetry that I previously described (not the 4-fold symmetry that you described - After discussions with Lubos Motl (Jacques Distler hasn't commented on my ideas lately - years ago I attended Physics grad school at the University of Texas at Austin, and would have hoped that Distler would at least give a serious comment), I'm convinced that the right-handed neutrino is a problem in Lisi's model), a 2-fold up-down symmetry, and a 2-fold matter-antimatter symmetry.

I think that SO(32)~E8xE8* is beautiful because fermions and bosons are allowed to exist in dual (reciprocal) lattices, one E8 is strictly real and is "twisted together" with the second strictly imaginary E8*, and SO(32) allows the complex representations needed for CP symmetry violation.

I know that Lisi was worried about "ghost" states, but I think that he incorrectly defined them, and forced bosons in the same representation as fermions. My "tachyons" have a spin of 1/2 in the 8-D Gosset lattice representation, but only a 0 spin projection into our 4-D of spacetime.

E8xE8* also solves a framing problem via the Haag-Lopuszanski-Sohnius theorem.

Good Luck in the contest & Have Fun!

Dr. Cosmic Ray

In this condition, if my posts are derleted, I stop to discuss with you.

I said I am good and my faith is very very big, hope you also you dislike the bad, personally I eat it at my breakfast, and even if I am dead i WILL CONTINUE AGAINST THE BAD.....thus what is the problem???

Answer anywhere........the real secret is the universal faith my friend.And a work is a work of all a life....not a short work of nothing.On that delete if you want it's not my problem.

Now I am going to pray for you a little, perhaps you shall see spheres, real and rational.

Steve

:) cool that,you know I see spheres everywhere me, logic it's my theory!!! I repeat it's my theory, still one it is my theory..I am not ^parano no just a little ,lol...you can copy but please make it correctly.A little of vanity hihih i CAN UNDERSTAND YOU KNOW THAT PEOPLE ARE EXITED OR FRUSTRATED ....One moment please I take my meds....I am better and less parano.Let's continue thus.

About the Lie Algebras ....well it is just a tool as many maths tools thus what is this circus? YOU KNOW THE ALGEBRAS it exists many kinds...but if you don't respect the foundamentals, that means nothing.

The dimensions rest in 3D at all scales...it's essential for our porportionalities, deterministics. When I see these extrapolations, it is laughing!!! That has no sense in a general point of vue as the higgs, the strings, the extradimensions,the multiverses, the hidden vraiables, the bells theorem....all that is a pure joke, the relativity is not that!!! I think really people confounds sciences fiction and rational sciences, natural and pragmatic.I can accept that the the creativity is essential, the dreams and this and that, but please don't confound the pure objectivity with a kind of subjectivity, irrational. It's not possible to accept that, the converghences are essential at my humble opinion. I beleive strongly that the computing is a main confusion about the insertion of codes and laws. The series seem lost in an ocean of personal sortings and synchro......

About the complexs I must say you that they are under the 3D spherical distribution....where have you seen extradimensions with complexs if we consider the meter or the miles if you prefer. At my knowledge the reals and the deterministic road is logic...see a fractal with R...Moebius Euler Bernouilli Riemann......we continue a simple road in 3d distibutivity on the road of reals....do you know the numbers of Bernouilli...it's better than Lie algebras.....now you can correlate with the foundamental theorem of algebras about reals and complexs.....IF YOU SOLVE AN EQUATION OF DEGREE MORE IMPORTANT that doesn't mean extradimensions because the pure distribution of numbers is spherical and purely linked with mass and the 3 dimensions and this time constant.If you use algebras thus you must respect its foundamentals.We arrive at the approximations...what are these approximations giving reals and complexs numbers under a pure 3D distributivity.You can extrapolate with the trigonom.equations.In logic the newtonian method and the descartes method of proportionalities are very very relevant.Let's take as example the derivations f(x)''' for the approximations.All that rests in the pure reals and in the sphere.The geometry is and will be always in 3D even for all utilized algebras.The lie algebras aren't the problem, just the utilization of these algebras seem irrational.That's why they invent as you extradimensions or extra things....in fact that doesn't respect the determinism simply and the pure rationality.

ps interesting your reaction, I am surprised, it's cool .

Best Regards

Steve