Dear Eckard
"For practical use Planck length, time and energy are obviously irrelevant."
I am not agree with you. All Planck finding relevant and useful.
Moreover, transcendental pi has a finite number of digits when the side of the inscribed polygons became equal to the Planck length.
All the best
Yuri
Dear Lev,
I see present mathematics based on a mutilated self-deceptive logic: Either smaller, or equal to, or larger than. What is wrong in my essay?
Dear Yuri,
You wrote: "All Planck finding relevant and useful. Moreover, transcendental pi has a finite number of digits when the side of the inscribed polygons became equal to the Planck length."
My argument was: Planck time, length, and energy are outside any applicable size.
Planck mass is within the measurable range but was never measured so far.
What about pi and the inscribed polgons, I also do not see any relevance.
Regards,
Eckard
