Alternative Models of Cosmology

marcovici alexandru

nee, stralingsdruk moet worden ingesloten, pandemiegewijs, rechtbank Den Haag

Het leren van een gebarentaal kan het intelligentiequotiënt verhogen
https://www.aslbloom.com/blog/benefits-of-learning-sign-language-at-an-early-age

Het IQ wordt momenteel alleen individueel afgenomen
Samenlevingen met een hoog IQ, zoals Mensa, voeren geen groeps-IQ-test uit

Twee mensen met een lage lengte zijn dwergen (en een laag IQ) die samenwerken in een
team kunnen een hoger IQ hebben dan één individu met een IQ dat hoger is dan het IQ van elk individu afzonderlijk

IQ_{persoon A}<IQ_{persoon B}+IQ_{persoon C}
IQ_{persoon A}>IQ_{persoon B}
IQ_{persoon A}>IQ_{persoon C}

Hierbij ook ecologische intelligentie genoemd quotiënt
Mensa monopolie concurrenten elimineren wij zijn slimmer jij kunt de waarheid niet aan (we willen niet dat jij de waarheid aankan, want waarheid is macht)

marcovici alexandru

Nein, der Strahlungsdruck muss im Hinblick auf eine Pandemie eingedämmt werden, Bezirksgericht Den Haag

Das Erlernen einer Gebärdensprache kann den IQ steigern.

https://www.aslbloom.com/blog/benefits-of-learning-sign-language-at-an-early-age

Der IQ wird derzeit nur individuell gemessen.
Gesellschaften mit hohem IQ, wie Mensa, führen keine Gruppen-IQ-Tests durch.

Zwei kleinwüchsige Personen (mit niedrigem IQ), die in einem Team zusammenarbeiten, können einen höheren IQ haben als eine Einzelperson, deren IQ höher ist als der IQ jedes einzelnen Mitglieds.

IQ_{Person A}<IQ_{Person B}+IQ_{Person C}
IQ_{Person A}>IQ_{Person B}
IQ_{Person A}>IQ_{Person C}

Auch ökologischer Intelligenzquotient genannt. Mensa-Monopol-Konkurrenten eliminieren uns, wir sind intelligenter, ihr könnt die Wahrheit nicht ertragen (wir wollen nicht, dass ihr die Wahrheit ertragen könnt, denn Wahrheit ist Macht).

marcovici alexandru

post scriptum the united states of America has had an boost in intelligence because of his deaf community ,

🐌 🐙

marcovici alexandru

bacterial cvorum is the term for different species of bacteria getting to understand each other after a while by exchanging common types of chemicals if they have the right stable environment

maybe educational systems should take in to account intelligence and taylor informations absobtion acordingly
i dont know the history of ISBN how it came in to existance however the book format seems pretty standard evryhwere , this i for the last years how could science be better i spoke mostly about sensory based education ignored on purpose the intelligence aspect

books and game design have great potential with many posibilities , for example imagine designed books that cannot be read individualy they must be read in team (pairwise,)

book industry is placing a great emphasis on literacy to filter for those only that are capable of absorbing information
maybe there are other book format out there that that are helpful for a higher variety of people and can be used in other ways

flash youtube shorts tick tock are screen based

here online encyclopedia of integer sequences must be mentioned , there are 300 000 entries
imagine combining two by two each of those sequences that would make an number of 90000000000 potential new sequences , it a shame that only a few people get(mathematicians, computer science) to see them
could not be a way to saturate the environment with various geometric patterns in a more organized way ?

bacteria spit chemicals around to feel comfortable and prepare the digestion of the surrounding environment

there is a ted talk, information is like food

why not an encyclopedia online/ofline of fractional ecological estimations calculations and sequences

marcovici alexandru

for example yesterday i was having an idea of reusing flyers by placing one person that is giving them to people at metrostation and an other person after a while takes them back, those flyers tipcally are not even read end end up in the trashcan

newyork time dot story is about a decision not to print a dot in hundreds of tausend of newspapers in order to spare ink

society is based today on the assumption of unlimited communication resources , this might sound against freespech a reduction or simplification of communication or other comunication conventions might be better also for the environment

todays society is instant update howver in the other extreme there are many distopian scenario there must be some conventions about how to take care of infornation in slower more meaningful way less expenasive and wasteful

marcovici alexandru

on flyer design , or website or whatever visual special ,if i know how is being done i'm less impressed and persuaded by the message
aplicable also essay contest here in order to write first person , third person impersonal
conveying meaning using certain style /theme , where those come from ?

maybe there is an influence of a certain autor, of way of speech that ended up written
in computer science is this idea of annotating data with more information
yes this may be also apicable for writing themes with multiple options of changing the way of presentation
more anotatiomn information that clarifiy the purpose and intent history could be subtle presented
such that it does not gives the impression of information overloading

marcovici alexandru

howver for people interaction there must be grammatical rules for how to use/behave the information

the temporal aspect of conversation (interactional nudge) has played a role in human evolution
with the advent of books this has bee delayed deformed consciusness internalized etc

if an information is unactionable namely i cannot reproduce and modify it is outside of the live interpersonal interaction

the sound has this feature if i hear something i can control my own voice and say it back
if i see something isometimes can and sometimes cannot draw back

here is a lot of work to do( short medium and long term)

this part of being in control of your own language
hearing a song and not being able to reply it back to anyone from memory
only by pointing to the reference (name of the song)

maybe (personaly i'm kind of sure of it) society should unlearn(forget( all the music and relearn how to make it from scratch in a long term cultural experiment

the sound special effects in todays music are basically completely virtual with no corepondece in natural reproductible environment

the history of art (here talking about music) is an intergenerational communication betwen styles
basically artists do monologues my art is better than yours kind of thing

now is a moment to develop entire languages in organized developed way

especially in music where the intent of the artist is to be as stunning / hipnotozing/ attention distraction as possible
this includes chillout relaxing genre that is stil a monologue of the artist emotions

emotion on demand is a dilution of emotion that are not any more a reflection of internals state for a communication purpose

emotion have evolved for communication interaction purpose this is the statement i must delve more on
the truth/ authenticity of the emotion diminishes after repeating and learning (to identify )what is about it

wearing headphones create echo chambers of uncommunicable experiences ,
phylosophy can help to navigate operate and communicate the taxonomy of experiences concepts

however

🐌

marcovici alexandru

visual language philosophy

🐙

when the internet was conceived 1970 was like an inertia of typewriter books
nobody could have had imagined instant transmission of imagines
(i mean the videophone was in sight , by at &t however it did not take over for whatever reasons (that are interesting to knnow)

it is not balanced at all think ! that an insect what effort is doing for some little tiny patch of food

electricity basically is heating the wires like a tea water heater ( there are no zero resistivity wires in public infrastructure)

so in summary comunication should be designed concieved in terms of resources energy consumption still to enable enough interactivity high control ,

the abstraction has happen so far only in terms of integrated circuits
( the history of automatons like cookuo clock and rotating dancer , mechanical turk have served only for prototypes and showcase not for an actual efficient comunication grammar)

for speed of fast control and variation the musical instruments are the main showcaser
(light armonica is a type of piano that can generate lights notes)

however the bands play to impress with louds sounds to be heard at broad range with no intention of receiving sounds back from the public (beside some claps and screams)

in my opinion this is a source of subconscious (learned) habitual tolerance (comfort) to sound pollution in todays society

marcovici alexandru

the history so far is more like: 🐒 uuu these are networks !?, lets use them for communication

instead of

lets design better communication

(wait nature & ecology has networks and communications to ?!?! )

yusrob

“The Theory of Nature” is a real, reasonable, simple, and clear dialectical-materialistic alternative to modern cosmology.

I'll repeat what I wrote earlier.

Now we should present the definition of NATURE, according to the “Theory of Nature”:
NATURE::=<Singularity, matter, void, UCN, FLN>.

In this definition:
Singularity is a special region of nature or a unique mechanism of nature with its own logic and operating algorithm;
matter is matter quanta (EUM) or material vacuum dust (MVD);
void is simply emptiness, an empty space, the absence of everything;
UCN is a unique constant of nature, its value is UCN=1.210 256*10^{44};
FLN is the Fundamental Law of Nature, the law of the circulation of matter in nature.

The diagram of nature's evolution over time will look like this:
… {{MVD ==> S==> EUM ==> U}|UCN²==> MVD}|∞ … .

Nature has neither a beginning nor an end in the time of its evolution. This is evidenced by the ellipses before and after the diagram of nature's evolution.
The symbol “S” denotes the Singularity;
The symbol “U” denotes the Universe;

The symbol sequence “|UCN^2” denotes the cyclical repetition of the preceding construct, enclosed in curly brackets (“{ }”), UCN² times.
The symbol sequence "|∞" denotes the cyclical repetition of the preceding construct, enclosed in curly brackets (“{ }”), infinitely many times.

The construct {MVD ==> S==> EUM ==> U} denotes one cycle of the Singularity's functioning.
The construction {MVD ==> S==> EUM ==> U}|UCN²==> MVD} denotes the complete evolution of one universe.

The question arises: where is the Universe's “pulsation counter”? After all, when UCN² pulsation cycles of the Singularity are reached, the evolution of one universe ends and the evolution of another begins. Within the framework of the “Theory of Nature”, this problem is resolved in a very beautiful and elegant way. But it's worth reading the TN itself.
After the evolution of one universe is complete, the evolution of another immediately begins. After all, the Singularity operates without interruption.

Thus, the evolution of nature is a sequence of evolutions of universes.
We can consider the process of the Singularity's functioning to be simultaneously a process of the Singularity's pulsation at a frequency of UCN cycles per natural unit of time (NUT).

More complete information on my alternative model of reality, my dialectical-materialistic YRA model of the universe (“DMYRAMU”), is presented in my book and in my articles.
One thing is worth noting and remembering. Although I speak in the article about my alternative model of reality, I have no doubt that my YRA model of the universe is reality itself. In what sense? In the sense that this very YRA model of the universe reflects, with a sufficient degree of detail, reliability, logic, and truth, NATURE itself, as (as) objective reality.

With respect
Robert Yusupov from Vladivostok, independent researcher, dialectical materialist, Marxist, communist

References

Nature as an Objective Reality https://philpapers.org/rec/YUSNAA,
Philosophy and Physics https://philpapers.org/rec/YUSPAP,
Theory of Nature (in Russian) https://philpapers.org/rec/YUSTON,
Announcement of the Scientific Revolution https://philpapers.org/rec/YUSAOT,
The Third Side of the Main Question of Philosophy (MQP) https://philpapers.org/rec/YUSTTS,
About the Quantum of Matter for Philosophers https://philpapers.org/rec/YUSPAT-2,
My View on K. Popper's Criterion https://philpapers.org/rec/YUSOLA,
Once Again about Nature and its Material Principles https://philpapers.org/rec/YUSOAA

AlexandreLutun

The ΛCDM model has been extraordinarily successful, providing a coherent framework that explains the cosmic microwave background, baryon acoustic oscillations, and large‑scale structure with remarkable precision. Yet, despite this robustness, persistent anomalies such as the Hubble tension (H₀) and the S₈ tension reveal its limits. My independent research with the AQ model builds directly on ΛCDM’s strengths: it validates the standard framework where it excels, but offers a decisive upgrade by resolving both tensions simultaneously while preserving BAO and CMB consistency.
The AQ model is grounded in quantitative predictions and empirical consistency, providing precise, falsifiable results aligned with robust cosmological datasets. For example, AQ yields H₀ ≈ 70.8 ± 0.9 km/s/Mpc and S₈ ≈ 0.78 ± 0.02, bridging the gap between Planck and local observations. Most alternative approaches address one anomaly at a time; AQ is unusual in resolving both simultaneously within a falsifiable framework. This dual achievement suggests that cosmology can move beyond the current divide, uniting robustness with innovation.
I present these results not only to highlight scientific progress but to open the way toward a serious partnership. Institutions such as FQXi have a unique role in supporting independent research that bridges rigor and innovation, and I would welcome the opportunity to explore how this collaboration could be developed further.

Delarge.D.Rico

Hello, fellow physicists. I had no idea where to share this, so I’m posting it here. I'm happy to present to you a new theory which I call the JRDCM System. This theory attempts to encapsulate every physical phenomenon within geometry (or at least, it tries). It is ready to receive feedback. I plan to update the blog with more theory related to it.

I must apologize beforehand, as I know little about formal physics and proper formats (latex and stuff); therefore, I uploaded the work to a blog.

https://thejrdcmsystem.blogspot.com/

I would like to continue working on the theory and refining it, so I’m asking for financial help. As an independent researcher, I use obsolete computers, so I would be very grateful if you could support me via Ko-fi.

https://ko-fi.com/ricodelarge

The blog will be updated until the theory reaches its final form.

So thanks, and have a very nice day!

yusrob

Everything that surrounds us, the entire material world surrounding us is nature.
We ourselves are part of nature. We are children of nature.
We belong to nature and exist in nature.
There is nothing in the material world around us that (or who) does not belong to nature or does not exist in nature.
Everything is nature.
Nature is the repository of everything and everyone.
Nature is the most general concept. There is no more general concept.
Nature is fundamentally material and dialectical.
The materiality of nature means that all natural bodies (subjects, things, objects) are material bodies (subjects, things, objects).

The materiality of bodies (subjects, things, objects) suggests that they all ultimately consist of minimal material formations (bodies).

The smallest material formations (bodies) in nature are elementary particles (electrons, protons, neutrons, etc.).
The materiality of elementary particles (electrons, protons, neutrons) implies that “the content of elementary particles is ‘pure’ concrete matter of nature”.

It is in this sense that one should understand the materiality of material bodies (subjects, things, objects).
Thus, all material bodies (subjects, things, objects) are ultimately composed of the matter of nature, of ‘pure’ concrete matter of nature. What's important here is the reference to the finite (not infinite) process of dividing a material body (subject, thing, object) into smaller parts, and, ultimately, dividing it into elementary particles.

The dialectic nature of nature implies the circumstance, the fact that everything in nature, all material bodies in nature and all real processes in nature are in constant change.

The most important fact of the materiality of nature is the fact that “the content of elementary particles is ‘pure’ concrete matter of nature”.

Facts are stubborn things. Facts of nature exist, take place in objective reality, in nature, independent of our consciousness and outside of our consciousness.

Facts are either recognized or not recognized.

The recognition of a fact of nature corresponds to the correct and true, true and scientific understanding of nature.
Conversely, failure to recognize a fact of nature corresponds to an incorrect and untrue, not true (= false) and unscientific (= anti-scientific, pseudoscientific) understanding of nature.

Let us note that this natural fact (“the content of elementary particles is ‘pure’ concrete matter of nature”) has not yet been recognized within the framework of the theory of modern physics (TMP).
The fact of this non-recognition is equivalent to the fact that the theory of modern physics (TMP) is not a true and scientific theory.

A true and scientific theory of physics (the foundations of physics) can only be constructed on the basis of recognition of this fact of nature.
This is beautifully demonstrated by the example of my “Theory of Nature”.
Within the framework of TN, this fact of nature is recognized: “the content of elementary particles is ‘pure’ concrete matter of nature”.

In the context of constructing the foundations of physics, taking this fact into account, the foundations of a new dialectical-materialistic physics were laid within the “Theory of Nature”. The matter of nature (concrete matter) is first and foremost explicitly presented within the subject area of the new physics. In the next step, the concrete matter of nature is introduced into the fold of the new physics as a fundamental physical quantity.

Ultimately, at the stage of constructing the foundations of the new dialectical-materialistic physics within the framework of TN, more than 40 fundamental problems of the foundations of physics and cosmogony (cosmology) were solved.
This marks a scientific Revolution in physics and cosmogony (cosmology).

Within the framework of the TN, the problem of the crisis in modern physics and natural science has been resolved. The fundamental nature of this long-standing and profound systemic crisis has been identified. This crisis is, first and foremost, a crisis of worldview. And the worldview of the theory of modern physics (TMP) is the false and anti-scientific bourgeois-idealistic worldview (BIW). This worldview is a product of the false and anti-scientific bourgeois-idealistic philosophy (BIP).

The main lie of this philosophy (BIP) and this worldview (BIW) is rooted in the fundamental principle of this philosophy and this worldview. This is the false principle of the primacy in nature of the idea (the ideal) over matter (the material).
The true principle affirms the primacy of matter (the material) over the ideal (the ideal) in nature. The truth of this principle is confirmed by practice. This is the practice of the individual. And it is the practice of all humanity throughout the entire historical path of the emergence and evolution of human society. Practice is the criterion of truth.
Begin your study of the “Theory of Nature” by studying the article “Nature as Objective Reality”.

In my book, “The Theory of Nature” (TN), I conclude that the ideas of “dark matter” and “dark energy” are erroneous concepts in the theory of modern physics.
My book states that “the content of elementary particles is ‘pure’ concrete matter of nature”.
I based my TN on this fact of nature.
This allowed me to solve 40 fundamental problems in the foundations of physics and cosmogony (cosmology) within the framework of TN.
This is a scientific revolution in physics and cosmology.
If you are interested, check out my bibliography. There is a link to the book and my other articles.

Sincerely,
Robert Yusupov from Vladivostok, author of “Theory of Nature”, independent researcher, dialectical materialist, Marxist, communist

References

Nature as an Objective Reality https://philpapers.org/rec/YUSNAA,
Philosophy and Physics https://philpapers.org/rec/YUSPAP,
Theory of Nature (in Russian) https://philpapers.org/rec/YUSTON,
Announcement of the Scientific Revolution https://philpapers.org/rec/YUSAOT,

« Previous Page