Hi Mario,
Never mind about the survey link - I see it is the same paper by Kormendy et al that you recommend! I just perused it yesterday - I'll try to read it more thoroughly.
PLEASE read my essay, Inappropriate Application of Kepler's Empirical Laws of Planetary Motion to Spiral Galaxies Created the Perceived Galaxy Rotation Problem - Thereby Establishing a Galactic Presence for the Elusive, Inferred Dark Matter.
I attempt to explain how the galaxy rotation problem was erroneously conceived. I suspect some may be put off by my introductory narrative and my approach as a information systems analyst, but I think that if you carefully read through it you'll find some useful information. You should find that I wholeheartedly agree with your assessment of the well known approaches using dark matter or modified gravity - they are merely compensation for a gross misconception about gravitation evaluation.
In addition to the well known models relying on dark matter or MOND that you mention, there is also an unfortunately obscure group of physicists who have developed models more appropriately representing the actual configuration of galactic mass and proper methods of evaluating galaxy rotational dynamics. They have been successfully described observed rotational characteristics. A sampling of their research reports is included in my essay's "Supplemental Information" section, especially:
James Q. Feng and C. F. Gallo. "Modeling the Newtonian dynamics for rotation curve analysis of thin-disk galaxies." Res. Astron. Astrophys. 11 (December 2011): 1429. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/11/12/005. arXiv:1104.3236v4.
These models do not attempt to describe spiral galaxy development/evolution as yours does. I suspect you'll find them complementary, though.
I just started looking at the galaxies you referred to, and found in http://www.astrophotos.net/pages/GALAXIES/ngc%20428.htm an image captioned:
"NGC 428 is classified as type SBm with a surface brightness of 13.5. At 70 million light years, NGC 428 shows a tidal tail, a deformed morphology and starburst activity indicating a past encounter with another galaxy."
That assessment seems likely to me - I think the flippant tail is a telling feature. I'd caution against drawing any conclusions about the structure of galaxies that have been violently distorted through interaction with another galaxy.
I'll try to evaluate the other galaxies you mention later, as I'm old, lame & getting very tired...
My objective is to expose the myth of dark matter - the emperor has no clothes! [this may now be an obscure reference to the old children's story, "The Emperor's New Clothes"...]
Jim
P.S Regarding nascent spiral galaxies, there's an interesting article in Science News, Hubble Spots the Farthest Spiral Galaxy Ever Seen. It references a report in Nature Letters, High velocity dispersion in a rare grand-design spiral galaxy at redshift z = 2.18.
P.P.S. I did send a link to your essay and a brief description to ~20 physicists (see my "Suppl." section) and interested parties. So far I've only received a response from one theoretical physicist who only commented that he'd seen your paper...