The Aether Medium Is Made of Waves by Jason Mark Wolfe

The progression of time is caused by the frequencies of aether waves. The existence of distance is caused by the wavelengths of the aether medium. Space and time are a continuum made of 3D wave-fronts of aether waves that obey

[math]c = \lambda f[/math]

It is really that simple.

Photons are just excitations of aether waves. Without photons/EM radiation, all you have is the quantum vacuum.

Gravity and equivalent acceleration causes time dilation, gravitational time dilation. When light illuminates curved space-time, the aether medium of a gravity field, it redshifts or blueshifts the light. Acceleration is coupled with redshift/blueshift/frequency shift. If the physics community ever decides it wants to build opto-electronic acceleration field generators, all you do is generate, repeatedly, an EM frequency shift or linear frequency chirp of the form,

[math]f(t) = \frac{\Delta f}{\Delta t}t f_0[/math],

where

[math]\frac{\Delta f}{\Delta t}[/math]

is as large as possible. Then refine your method. This will reveal a whole new area of phenomena permitted by nature. Propulsion is one obvious application. Experiments will teach how to construct the math.

I wanted to come up with a gravity drive/acceleration field generator by connecting quantum mechanics and special relativity together in some very simple way that could be experimentally verified. Instead of going for a mathematical model, I went with an intuitive model based upon what I thought was the simplest building block of nature. In my estimation, the building blocks are waves that, first and foremost, support the characteristics of light. The speed of light, c, keeps showing up in physics equations in QM, SR and GR. If the ontological building blocks of the laws of physics were LEGO, then the simplest ontological component would be one Lego brick. I think that the simplest building block of our laws of physics is a wave, described as a quantum wave, that when energized, it becomes a photon.

I think that wave-functions can become more complicated than nature really intended. So I will say that wave-functions describe waves of the aether medium, but that sometimes we over-complicate our description of aether waves.

Aether waves are an ontological phenomena of nature. Everything is made of these waves. Aether waves are the complete set of waves that obey

[math]c = \lambda f[/math].

This assures that everything that is made of these waves is compliant to the postulates of special relativity.

The whole reason for this paper was to identify an ontological cause for gravity. An aether medium made of waves gives you a threads out of which the fabric of space-time is woven. Distance between two points in space-time is made of all of the wavelengths of the set of waves. Distance is made of wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum. Aether waves are a set of frequency/wavelength pairs. So distance in flat space-time is just the wavelengths of that set of waves. When a photon goes by, it is just an excitation of these aether waves.

What is the progression of time? We define one second with an atomic clock that is 9.1 billion periods of a Cesium atom radiation emission. Nature has a whole spectrum of frequencies with which to produce the progression of time.

How does nature produce gravity? It's a curvature of space-time. But space-time is made of waves, right? Gravitational redshift is the illumination of the curvature of space-time, along the radial axis of a gravitating body. That is our hint, our clue for creating a gravity drive.

Hi Peter,

I was influenced by your perspective, or at least I think we share a very similar point of view.

"The simple fact then is; If c is constant locally on transformation both f and lambda must change equally. I suggest that simple statement is as pregnant as any phrase we have ever heard. Wavelength change is indeed time dilation and length contraction due to temporal evolution of interaction, a la Christian Doppler. "

I completely agree, in fact I thought this was self evident. Trying to explain this to physics educated rocks on sciforum.com has been incredibly frustrating. I would try to explain that the invariance of the speed of light, for all reference frames, is an extremely significant observation; as if the laws of physics were shouting, "It's about properties of light!!!!!!" But I got whacked for trying to use the mathematical " inertial reference frames" as ontological object.

I wanted to express great appreciation for reading my resume and finding something positive about it. Yes, I will read your resume as well. As for grammatical errors, yes, I admit that MS Word is not a reliable grammar checker.

Peter,

I hope you won't mind if I share the Grand Design with you; a simple version. Aether waves are the ontological building blocks of our universe. All the properties of light (permitivity, permeability, etc.) are built into them. They were inspired by wave-functions of the form,

[math]\psi = e^{i \omega t}[/math]

and the two postulates of special relativity.

#1. The laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference.

#2. The speed of light in free space has the same value C in all inertial frames of reference.

These postulates are hard to explain ontologically, but there is a way. One has to assume that the laws of physics are implemented by the set of (aether) waves that obey,

[math]c = \lambda f[/math]

Inertial frames are a mathematical tool that allows you to set up a coordinate system; but I will refer to them in the ontological sense when I say: inertial reference frames are made of those same aether waves. Particles with mass are the smallest physical objects that can be described with inertial frames. Whatever equations and descriptions are used to describe particles of the Standard Model, those equations describe one or more aether waves. Quarks, gluons, protons, neutrons, hadrons, electrons, leptons all have a unique spectral signature, a range of aether medium frequencies. When those particles are annihilated by their antiparticle, the spectral signature is released as gamma rays. It is this spectral signature that establishes that particle's relationship to its inertial frame's clock (progression of time). This is the simplest way that Standard Model particles can obey the postulates of relativity; they are made out of aether waves which satisfy c = wavelength*frequency.

We experience inertia because the composition of frequencies that make up our particles, they have to frequency shift from one set of aether wave frequencies to another set of aether wave frequencies. We experience this as a force that disturbs inertia.

Hi Vladimir,

I am delighted that you enjoyed the paper. I am very pleased that you got the " Fourier-like universal wave aether " idea.

You asked an excellent question, "I would not go so far as to say that the aether itself is made of waves. Waves of what?"

What are these waves made of? I modeled the idea after wave-functions. In a way, these waves are made out of probability, which sounds evasive and hard to imagine. Waves of aether? What does that mean? Basically, aether is a type of empty space that supports the characteristics of light. The closest analogy I can think of is a virtual environment that has rules; the aether would implement that set of rules.

Hi Vladimir ,

I want to applaud your paper for "A proposal to reconstruct physics from simple physically realistic first principles is outlined using a Beautiful Universe model." The theoretical physics community should be looking for a simple physically realistic building block of some kind from which to construct the laws of physics.

As a very simple approach to answer this very question, I modeled the aether wave after the wave-function for a plane wave and the two postulates of special relativity. I said that aether waves don't have to be physically tangible for them to exist. They are allowed to be extremely subtle.

There is only one definition of an aether medium that makes any sense: it has to be a "light bearing aether". Whatever the true ontological medium really is, it enforces the invariance of the speed of light.

Hi Vladimir,

I'm not convinced that the speed of light, in a vacuum, can be changed locally because of general relativity. Is this experimentally verified?

Hi Vladimir,

I just mean that I expect the proper speed of light in a vacuum to reliably be c = 3x10^8 m/s. If the proper speed of light in a vacuum changes from this value, then the permitivity and permeability of free space will change as well. After all,

[math]c^2 \epsilon_0 \mu_0 = 1[/math]

In other words, the proper speed of light in a vacuum is reliably constant.

Hi Jeff,

I agree with your second statement, that aether waves cause the 3 spatial dimensions (and time) to exist, apart from which nothing would exist.

The physicics community is motivated by the desire to explain everything with a model. My motiviation is different. I started off with the assumption that gravity drives and acceleration field generators are allowed by nature. So I had to figure out what was the ontological nature of space itself. Afterall, general relativity is about curving space-time. If I'm trying to curve space-time, then I have to know what space-time is. Furthermore, I need some way to curve it without using ridiculous amounts of mass-energy. So basically, I took the two postulates of special relativity, I combined them with wave functions, and I created an aether medium that obeys SR and QM.

Since gravity causes light to freequency shift along the radii of the gravitating body, I decided to try it in reverse. The idea is to emit a linear EM frequency chirp, repeatedly. I hope that this will cause the immediate space-time to curve, thus inducing a gravity field.

For this to work, I have to overcome conservation of energy, but not violate it. Anyway, thank you for inquiring.

Jason Wolfe

Hi Jeff,

"I view matter as waves that travel as holes in the aether (versus a particle). "

As holes? I am familiar with holes (and electrons) from solid state physics and semiconductor physics. Such a hole is an absence of an electron. But now I am puzzled by your idea that matter travels as a "hole" in the aether. I believe that de Broglie waves tell us that matter (electrons, protons, etc) are groups of aether waves that move together. When a particle meets its antiparticle, that which groups the aether waves (into a particle) cancels out. The result is that the energy stored in the particle is now released as a gamma ray burst.

I am perfectly OK with the idea that a hyperspace might coexist with out space-time. I believe that someday we might figure out how to build a spaceship that can travel through hyperspace thus traveling faster than light. In my interpretation,

space-time is made of waves that obey,

[math]c = \lambda f = \frac{1}{sqrt{\epsilon_0 \mu_0}}[/math]

In contrast, hyperspace is made of waves that obey (the same equation but with c'>>c). The equation won't output.

The idea is that two universes, with different physics constants, can coexist without one universe being aware of the other. Hyperspace matter can pass right through us without our noticing it.

My point is that each universe has its own set of aether waves. Each set of aether waves has its own set of physics constants. If aether waves don't exist, then neither does the progression of time nor the existence of distance.