• [deleted]

Steve,

Very well you may talk about spheres but that just reflects the point that you are following the herd and refusing to see what is before your very eyes.

Equilateral energies form the Universe we inhabit - Equilateral mass-Energies and Tetrahedral Matter [see attached].

On my YouTube channel I offer you detailed explanations for QM, QED, Q-Chemistry and Quantum Gravity for your consideration [all united under Tetryonics] - something 300 years of spherical geometry has failed to achieve.

I trust with time you will open your mind to the answers it provides and see spheres for the what they really are [a macroscopic construct resulting from the quantum tessellation of equilateral energies]Attachment #1: Tetryonic_theory_800x600.jpgAttachment #2: 2_EM__massENERGYMatter_800x600.jpg

I know that it is well, thanks. You know Abraham, don't be too much jealous and envious, you know it is not serious if a young belgian has found. The jealousy and the vanity you know are not the good partners for correct universal extrapolation, but it is just a suggestion of course.Don't be touched, I just explain how I see. I don't need to read your publications, fqxi is sufficcient to show me that you are just not foundamental and general. Probably the syndrom of the searcher.

Insert my equations and my theory of spherization, you shall be better, you shall see.

Regards thinker of tetryonics. And forget a little your strings and chains and think by yourself ina pure spherical road.

the spherical Jedi.

    • [deleted]

    Steve,

    I note the tone of your comments and question why you didn't enter an essay outlining the full details of your spherical theory to let others comment on your work [and let it speak for itself]

    We all appreciate a new way of interpreting the physics we know.

    Perhaps you should read the publications you comment on - so you may make better informed comments [Tetryonics has nothing to do with strings].Attachment #1: 1_massENERGYMatter_in_motion_800x600.jpg

    Mr Abraham,

    Why I should make this contest or why I should publish ?

    It is indeed a good question. In fact I don't know, perhaps that it is not important for me the competition.Or perhaps that I have difficulties to focus on topics.Or perhaps that I have difficulties to resume the generality.Or perhaps I have too much things to pubklish, so I don't know how I must do.Or perhaps that I need a team to help me.Or perhaps thatI lmike to see the copycats.Or perhaps I like to learn on this platfrom. Or perhaps for me that the only one importance is the sharing in a total transparence.Or perhaps I am too much occupied with my equations also and its derivations in my head.Or perhaps I smoke too much.Or perhaps my meds are too much strong.Or perhaps I need to find a girlfreind.Or perhaps I need to be less parno.Or perhaps that I need to find a job.Or perhaps that the number is finite for the uniqueness :)

    Spherically yours, they turn so they are.:)

    The spherical Jedi.

    Ahahah yes of course, a small string perhaps in a compactification of pure reductionism in 11 dimension with a bridge in 7 to 8 and 12 after, of course.And also the 2d M theory is convergent with the pi extrapolation for the equivalence peinciple between mass/E. and what after ?

    a beer from Belgium and our planet are tetryon, and our stra also, our eyes are teryonical mass energy brane.And also the brains are not spherical and also a water drop is not a sphere, our universal sphere is ion a tetryonic superimposing of dimensionalities.because the fractal of spaces in a pure numerical way is entropical.Of course also, the mass is not proportional with rotating spheres because the tetryonisation of extradimensions are ina pure Pauli principle. Now of course the rotations are not important and the angles also are not important.The tetryon is the answer and the favorate sports of humans are not with spheres.Of course the arrogance is not important inside the sciences community and the humility is in the extradimensionalities of complexs numbers.of course the BH are not spheres but tetryons and our particules elemenatry also are not spheres.The flowers them are tetryons of Entropy.And the primes are in a parallelization of primes.Now of course the sphericality is on the road again ...and the tetryonix is a mTheorization of branes of diemsnionalities.Of course .Equilateral energies , and what after they do not turn also?

    ps you do not explain the gravity, me yes ! with humility of course.

    Regards :) let's play like children, innocent and arrogant.

    That said, I see on net that you want save the world.Me also, it is well, we have the syndrom of the savor, let's collaborate so.

    1 composting at Big Scale, WE MUST REBUILD THE SOILS !!!are you ok ?

    • [deleted]

    Steve,

    With all humility, I think the World should save itself, all I offer is the tools to do so.

    Gravity is covered [see attached] but just not released yet. To that end Tetryonics reveals Gravity to be 3-fold quantum GEM [convergent/interactive/perturbative] forces that have been modelled mathematically, from physical observations, as a single nett convergent force.

    Once QG is revealed the true mechanics of 'fusion' can be replicated and all radioactive wastes and contaminated soils etc. can be turn into pure energy and recycled back into useful elements [as per Tetryonic Chemistry] as you agree.

    But no Strings or Black holes or Time Travel [at all] even Pi is just Pi radians of equilateral geometries, of course many will seek to see their own theories in the work I have done after all how many times have scientists proclaimed "but we knew that all the time" after a discovery was made.

    Finally, I would rather the World benefited from my work than to be personally recognised for it [hence why it is all on the net for all to see].Attachment #1: Figure_70.12__Tetryonic_GEM_fields_800x600.jpgAttachment #2: 2_massENERGYMatter_in_motion_800x600.jpg

    Well, if you want to solve the world, you must have concrete solutions.The composting is essential. The thermophile phasis is essential. The system can be o^ptimized, furthrmore I have invented a correlated natural motor. The biomass is not a probelm when the adds of parameters are inserted with rationality. The soils must be redynamised. The composting at Global sale is a priority, all governments must take a specific strategy correlated with the increase of vegetal mass. That , it is a solution, yours no. The soils must rebuild and the composting is essential for our earth.

    If your solutions are concrete, you shall be recognized, if not, learn simply :)

    C/N for the compsoting .....bacterias, heat,methan,.......I accelerate the processus ....very relevant you know.

    Regards

    *Abraham*,

    The lunar influence on earth flybys fits with the problems experienced by Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin as they descended to the moon's surface. Were they in the grip of the lunar exotic matter? I think they were.

    Neil Armstrong and the Landing of the Eagle UPDATED

    [quote]Eagle had overshot the landing zone, Home Plate, by four miles. A slight navigational error and a faster than intended descent speed accounted for Eagle missing its planned touchdown site in the Sea of Tranquility.[end quote]

      • [deleted]

      Alan,

      As noted in the GEM illustrations sent to you the convergent G-field modelled by observations is in fact a EM field close to objects of Matter [Earth, moon etc].

      As any object approaches the moon [for example] it will experience a interactive E-field and then a perturbative M-field both of which will accelerate charged Matter in differing strengths and directions.

      These affects are predicted by GR [8piG] vs Newtonian [4piG] but not the direction of interactions as GR treats all energies are convergent and are usually ignored in lunar calculations as the G-field is considered to be too weak to model relativistically

      Yes even neutral Matter is comprised of charged fascia [see Tetryonic QM - 1 tonne = 1.355e50 charged quanta]

      Also of note is the fact that the astronauts had considerable difficulty in removing the lunar soils from their suits at the end of each EVA [due to the lunar soils having a slightly negative charge compared to the Astronauts]

      I'd forgotten about the charged nature of the lunar soil. I was always suspicious in the fact that the lunar rock brought back from the surface is better guarded than the gold in Fort Knox. Are there mysteries and inconsistensies which have been overlooked or even concealed I wonder?

      • [deleted]

      Alan,

      I suspect the value apportioned to Lunar rocks has something to do with the Apollo program costing $25 billion and only 380kg of Lunar rock was brought back [that's $73.5 million/kg excluding what they made selling the rights to Velcro and Tang]

      There's a great TV show called "Million Dollar Moon Rock Heist" where a Salt lake City Uni student stole ALL the rock samples NASA had in a lab at the Johnson Space Labs in 2002 and tried to sell them to an overseas buyer for a few million.

      As another interesting fact, if you check out my Chemistry videos on YouTube [specifically CHs 54 & 60 re Isotopes] you'll see how energy increases the mass of Elements like Oxygen etc showing the effect of Solar irradiance on the lunar rocks. The moon has higher O18 & He3 concentrations than the Earth die to is lack of atmosphere etc.

      Oh and note that ALL elements have the same number Protons, electrons and Neutrons with differing energy levels [not the extra Neutron models currently used] ie O18 has 8P/8N/8e and 2N worth of energy not 10N as often claimed] see Chapter 52 for 3D models of all the elements.

      If Tetryonics has taught me anything thing it is that they are MANY inconsistencies in the current modelling of physics - hence the 1300 illustrations I've produced to date.Attachment #1: Figure_52.08__Oxygen_aufbau_800x600.jpgAttachment #2: Figure_54.13__Oxygen_isotopes_800x600.jpg

      Abraham,

      Okay, thanks for the extra info. So it's the lack of an atmosphere which gives the dust a negative charge and the lunar rocks aren't thought to be anything super extra special.

      I even had the idea that the moon might be responsible for the precession of Mercury and make Einstein's solution obsolete. It's either the moon or Mars. The current rover and Mars orbiter should be able to identify the effect of the extra force of Mars' equatorial region. It won't be long before the truth is out.

        • [deleted]

        Alan,

        Close, the simplest way to put it is that the moon is a charged body moving through the SUN's EM field [and its soil accumulates a charge in the process].

        Einstein's GR is still right but under Tetryonic GEM the strictly convergent force of Gravity is comprised of divergent interactive and perturbative forces closer into the body [and the strength of these interactions are in turn influenced by the amount of Matter in the bodies]

        GR [being based on SR] fails to recognise the quantum mechanics underlying the interactive and perturbative components of the Gravitation field. [EM masses are accelerated and Lorentz contracted by E-fields not Gravitational or Magnetic fields]

        LeVerrier and others calculated for perturbations of Mercury's orbit just after Neptune was found and couldn't account for it using Newtonian Gravity - that's why Einstein developed GR - and why we had to invent Dark Matter to account for discrepancies in his model.

        But you're right, very accurate measurement of G-field with EM waves from Curiosity & Juno etc. will help to prove this never-the-less - as long as they understand the real mechanism for the 'extra gravitational-shifting' they detect.

        Given enough time the truth is bound to come out - I just hope they don't want to modify GR again!

        Oops, I meant to say Venus as the contender for Mercury's precession and *not* Mars, due to it being the closer of the two. Schoolboy error!

        Abraham,

        Why not compromise and call this idea something like "the additional force on the plane of rotation of a planet or moon" and not specify the exact cause? I want to attract some interest from others so that progress can be made with new ideas and some rough calculations perhaps.

        I've just read about Venus and think that there is a clue:

        [quote]Venus is believed to have previously possessed oceans,[14] but these vaporized as the temperature rose due to the runaway greenhouse effect.[15] The water has most probably photodissociated, and, because of the lack of a planetary magnetic field, the free hydrogen has been swept into interplanetary space by the solar wind. [end quote]

        It's possible that the planet previously had a magnetic field which ties in with idea that inner convection is created by non-Newtonian matter i.e. by the moon. It sounds as though Earth might have acquired Venus's life giving moon for example. Do you think that this is a contender?

        Do you think Venus is the likeliest candidate for Mercury's orbital anomaly as I do?

          A knowledge of when the equatorial plane of Venus and Mercury are aligned and for how long is the next step. Any ideas?

          • [deleted]

          Alan,

          I don't think it is wise to develop an theory that doesn't have an explanation for its motive force [or for the corrections it predicts], that would put us back to Newtonian gravity with no explanation for its mechanics.

          GR obviously attempts to overcome this by giving us the correct answer but couches the answer as being the result of 'space-time' geometry [but it also fails to address how gravity works - undetected 'gravitons and g-waves included]

          Tetryonics explains the quantum interactions for Newtonian Gravity and GR through GEM interactions accounting for both theories and paving the way for testable refinements to the nett force of Gravitation.

          BUT [and it is a bit BUT], any test using EM waves must accurately calculate the exact interactions these fields have on top of the gravity field [unless you can exclude them]....and that's where Newton and Einstein both failed [they had no explanation of the quantum interactions at play that give rise the nett force of gravitation] because they never differentiated between EM mass and Matter.

          In short, call it what you want but you need a solid mechanical basis on which to explain established proven theories so it can be mathematically modelled and physically tested in some way [otherwise it remains a speculative theory like strings etc].

          Re: the effect Venus had on Mercury's orbital perturbations - any change in either planet's EM field would have an effect, but no where near as significant as the SUN's GEM effect on Mercury by many orders of magnitude given the relative distances between each of them [G&E fields are inverse squared and dipole M-fields are inverse cubed].

          Again it would require the modelling of various the theories against observational data [and if that data is generated from EM waves...well I think you get the point]

          Given the GEM interactions and the geometry of the fields I am more than confident that the SUN's M-field is the source of Mercury's orbital precession and that close flybys of spacecraft in Earth's GEM fields will bear it out [but an accurate field model of the quantum GEM interactions is required to prove this and this is beyond my resources at present].

          • [deleted]

          Have you seen my essay?

          http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1413

          • [deleted]

          Neutral Fermions [1 Gluon, 1 Neutrino]

          Error: gluon not fermion it is boson

          • [deleted]

          Yuri,

          Yes I have read your essay and see many agreeable points.

          Charge in our universe is a powerful symmetry resulting from equilateral energy geometries creating all of our fundamental particles and forces including the physical constants.

          1. Time is 'cyclic' being formed from equilateral geometries but it can viewed as a 'classical inductive loop' of energy forming the 2 charges [Positive and Negative from which all charged geometries arise]

          2. The Universe is dynamic [eternally cycling between gravitational Matter and radiant KEM energies]

          The KEM wave is the Kinetic ElectroMagnetic wave comprising the Kinetic Energies & Magnetic moment of Matter in motion [it is this that is Lorentz variant NOT standing-wave Matter].

          3. Gravity is fundamental - created from the 3D charged geometry of Matter acting against surrounding vacuum energies to create Einstein's GR pressure gradient.

          4. ALL the physical constants are derived from the interaction of equilateral energy geometries with Gravity being the exception (it is circular and results from 3 quantum force interactions to create the nett force we observe as the gravitation of Matter).

          Alpha is the equilateral quantised Angular momenta [m^2/s] that forms Planck's constant [kg.m^2/s]

          5. While Gravity is limited to c as its propagation speed, it is only 1 [of 3] quantum interactions that form the nett Gravitation we observe and once the GEM field is established it can transfer momenta 'nearly instantaneously' through the energy-momenta of the longitudinal wave geometry of its KEM wave

          Thus explaining c as the maximum velocity of propagation [GR] of Gravity and Newton's action-at-a-distance.

          6. I agree Planck units are irrelevant due to incorrect use of c units in their definition (along with the non-existent distinction between mass & Matter in current physics)

          Maths without (accurate physical) Models is Muddling [and Maddening]

          7. There are NO black holes - the singularities that point to them are the foci of GEM Pinch fields that convert standing-wave Matter to radiant Energy in the cores of Stars and Galaxies. (It is only the mathematical modelling of these GEM fields without accurate physical models that leads physicists to the conclusions of Singularities and Black holes)

          8. TIME can be resolved down to a measurement of the total quantised Angular momentum per unit of 2D space [m^2/s / c^2] which equals seconds. Include the Planck energy present [E/c^2 = mass] in this same calculation and you get [kg.s] which is a measurement of Charge.

          Thus proving that the equilateral geometry of Planck energy quanta forms the basis of Charge and Time in our Universe

          Having solved some many QM, QED, Chemistry and Cosmology mysteries with equilateral geometry [including Q-Gravity] I know that even with the powerful solutions Tetryonics provides there remain mysteries in science that can only be solved through applying this geometry in even greater detail [as I continue to do daily].

          Check out my YouTube channel [Tetryonics] for the full breakdown of all of Physics, I hope you'll join me in furthering the boundaries of Science.Attachment #1: Figure_61.07__3D_SpaceTime_800x600.jpgAttachment #2: Figure_70.01__GEM_fields_800x600.jpg