[deleted]
Have you seen my essay?
http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1413
Have you seen my essay?
http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1413
Neutral Fermions [1 Gluon, 1 Neutrino]
Error: gluon not fermion it is boson
Yuri,
Yes I have read your essay and see many agreeable points.
Charge in our universe is a powerful symmetry resulting from equilateral energy geometries creating all of our fundamental particles and forces including the physical constants.
1. Time is 'cyclic' being formed from equilateral geometries but it can viewed as a 'classical inductive loop' of energy forming the 2 charges [Positive and Negative from which all charged geometries arise]
2. The Universe is dynamic [eternally cycling between gravitational Matter and radiant KEM energies]
The KEM wave is the Kinetic ElectroMagnetic wave comprising the Kinetic Energies & Magnetic moment of Matter in motion [it is this that is Lorentz variant NOT standing-wave Matter].
3. Gravity is fundamental - created from the 3D charged geometry of Matter acting against surrounding vacuum energies to create Einstein's GR pressure gradient.
4. ALL the physical constants are derived from the interaction of equilateral energy geometries with Gravity being the exception (it is circular and results from 3 quantum force interactions to create the nett force we observe as the gravitation of Matter).
Alpha is the equilateral quantised Angular momenta [m^2/s] that forms Planck's constant [kg.m^2/s]
5. While Gravity is limited to c as its propagation speed, it is only 1 [of 3] quantum interactions that form the nett Gravitation we observe and once the GEM field is established it can transfer momenta 'nearly instantaneously' through the energy-momenta of the longitudinal wave geometry of its KEM wave
Thus explaining c as the maximum velocity of propagation [GR] of Gravity and Newton's action-at-a-distance.
6. I agree Planck units are irrelevant due to incorrect use of c units in their definition (along with the non-existent distinction between mass & Matter in current physics)
Maths without (accurate physical) Models is Muddling [and Maddening]
7. There are NO black holes - the singularities that point to them are the foci of GEM Pinch fields that convert standing-wave Matter to radiant Energy in the cores of Stars and Galaxies. (It is only the mathematical modelling of these GEM fields without accurate physical models that leads physicists to the conclusions of Singularities and Black holes)
8. TIME can be resolved down to a measurement of the total quantised Angular momentum per unit of 2D space [m^2/s / c^2] which equals seconds. Include the Planck energy present [E/c^2 = mass] in this same calculation and you get [kg.s] which is a measurement of Charge.
Thus proving that the equilateral geometry of Planck energy quanta forms the basis of Charge and Time in our Universe
Having solved some many QM, QED, Chemistry and Cosmology mysteries with equilateral geometry [including Q-Gravity] I know that even with the powerful solutions Tetryonics provides there remain mysteries in science that can only be solved through applying this geometry in even greater detail [as I continue to do daily].
Check out my YouTube channel [Tetryonics] for the full breakdown of all of Physics, I hope you'll join me in furthering the boundaries of Science.Attachment #1: Figure_61.07__3D_SpaceTime_800x600.jpgAttachment #2: Figure_70.01__GEM_fields_800x600.jpg
Re: your "But I would say why would Nature have two identical 'particles' based on different geometry."
Because the inscribed sphere to face of a regular tetrahedron has exactly the same surface to volume ratio, i.e. their "activities" are equal! One represents mass, the other energy.
Hai,
As it is shown to be in Tetryonics mass is a measure of the amount of equilateral Energy found in any time based co-ordinate system. You will note the left and right rotation vectors that I draw on my charge diagrams [see attached] they reflect the 'direction' that the electromagnetic inductive flux moves within the equilateral geometry to produce the 2 charges we know.
Currents in EM Inductors (once established) resist changes to their energy levels - in that they are often called electrical mass equivalents.
Collections of these 'ideal quantum inductors' combine to form charged Bosons [ODD numbered quanta] which in turn combine again to form Photons [EVEN numbered quanta] and standing wave Matter [4n quanta - Tetryons] .
All Matter radiates EM energies [particularly when in motion where it has Kinetic energy and a magnetic moment] which spreads out from its source Matter and interacts to form the physical CONSTANTS that we are familiar with and eventually weakens to the point that it forms the Vacuum Energies that surround everything in the Universe.
It is this ever-present Vacuum energy permeating the Universe that the 3D standing-wave geometries of Matter displace when they are created - in turn the Vacuum energies try to equalise the pressure differential resulting from the presence of Matter creating the force of Gravity.
These two forces [CONVERGENT Gravity and INTERACTIVE Electromagnetism] act in unison at the quantum level to produce a nett gravitational force that we observe as the single force of Gravity between large-scale material objects
This shows us that all mass-ENERGY and Matter throughout the Universe has equilateral geometries and that the interaction of EM inductive loops of energy with their surrounding EM field environment is the source of the property mass [not the Higgs boson as is claimed - in fact the Higgs being a Boson is just an ODD numbered transverse wave-form of a specific mass-energy and on that basis is no more important that a long blade of grass in a meadow]
The entire Universe works on the principle of ElectroMagnetic induction with its equilateral geometries forming the basis for the shapes of everything we can see and sense throughout it.
The energy in every charged EM field has a mass equivalence and these EM fields join to form the charged fascia of all Matter [Matter is made of mass-energies].
Any form of Matter made of inductive masses will create an additional Kinetic EM [KEM] field that is proportional to its velocity [KEM = mv^2] comprising its Kinetic energy and its magnetic moment. It is this field that is Lorentz variable to velocity changes not the Matter [which is always Lorentz invariant due to the fact that its energy is always moving at c in the first place when it is formed]
Any change in mass is not a change in Matter geometry and moving an object from the Earth to the moon will result in differing measurements of its weight [m=F/a] because of the different strength of GEM gravitation at each place. The charged geometries that make up its Matter in both cases remains the same [as does the mass-Energies that create those charged fascia], however the gravitational field of the moon [comprised of G-E-M forces] has a different strength to that on the Earth and produces a different acceleration interaction resulting in the smaller weight measured using Newton's formula. [see attached]
In short all mass-ENERGY-Matter in this universe is made of equilateral energy quanta. If you smash them together [at any speed] all the energies in the impacting bodies will explode outward [think of a Lego block creation breaking up when you smash two together] the individual energies then recombine to form [ODD numbered] Bosons, [EVEN numbered] Photons and [4n number] Tetrahedrons of Matter.
Of course this has been the broadest overview of all the mechanics and dynamics possible (and much more detailed illustrations on these topics are on my YouTube channel Tetryonics) but I hope it was what you were seeking - feel free to contact me if you have any additional questions - I'll take a look at your essay as well.Attachment #1: Charged_massENERGYMatter_800x600.jpgAttachment #2: Figure_62.11__mass___gravity__weight_800x600.jpg
Ted,
Your 'inscribed spheres in Tetrahedrons' are better reflected in Tetryonics as follows:
Tetrahedral mass-ENERGY
circumscribed by
Spherical co-ordinate system
This gives us:
2D mass - equilateral energy bounded by c^2 circle [E/c^2]
3D Matter - tetrahedral energy waveform bounded by sphere [E/c^4]
SO while you prefer a sphere IN a Tetrahedron I say a sphere AROUND [or encompassing] a tetrahedron [see attached]Attachment #1: Figure_61.01__Spatial_geometries_800x600.jpgAttachment #2: Figure_69.02__EM_mass__G_Matter_800x600.jpg
Hai,
What you are alluding to [I think] is the distinction between mass and Matter, where it is Matter that experiences the force of Gravity to create weight.
Tetryonics has VERY rigid definitions of the terms EM mass and Matter with the former being a 2D radiant energy geometry and the later being a 3D tetrahedral standing-wave geometry possessing volume.
EM masses do not experience gravitational forces - due to their planar radiant nature whereas Matter on the other hand is subject to the force of Gravity as it is a standing-wave geometry
Of note is the fact that Bosons and Photons are Matter-less [not massless as often stated as they have Energy/c^2 geometries] - so the Higgs boson although it possessed mass will be weightless.
It is an ODD numbered equilateral energy geometry that represents only a fraction of any Matter geometry that is destroyed in LHC collider collisions [of any energy level] - with all Matter possessing multiple odd number bosons to form their square energy levels [n]
I know many will say that GR shows that Photons experience 'gravitational shifting' due to their mass in a gravity field - but Tetryonics clearly shows the quantum interactions at work that form the nett convergent force we call Gravitation are in fact EM and Gravitational - finally revealing the fact that gravitational shifting is in fact the result of the Lorentz contraction of EM masses in a GEM field.
The Higgs boson [as you point out] is simply one particular energy level that contributes to the total mass of any Matter [or Kinetic EM field] geometry - until the geometry is destroyed in a collision and its EM mass-energy is released.
Interestingly, it is not the massive HIGGs Boson that creates the observed property of mass - it is the many smaller inductive loop [ZPF] geometries of the individual quanta that make up the ODD number geometry of all bosons.
I hope I have explained this clearly for you, if not post an additional comment [my YouTube channel has much more detail on these points].Attachment #1: 1_Charged_massENERGYMatter_800x600.jpgAttachment #2: Figure_73.08__The_Bending_of_Light_800x600.jpg
Hai,
I realise that it can be difficult to follow what I put in words in response to your enquiry on the HIGGS boson and its relationship to mass-Matter and weight [particularly with the finer points of the mass-Matter relationship - after all physics has never differentiated between the two properties in a formal basis like Tetryonics does].
So please note the attached illustration that I created to be read in conjunction with the previous answer posted.
I hope it will help you in understanding the relationship between the charged geometry [Zero point inductive loops] of Energy and the physical properties of mass-Matter and weight.
In short the HIGGS is just another boson like the W's that is PART of the charged fascia of all Matter but with a higher mass-energy geometry [I would prefer that the whole concept be dropped as it just adds confusion to the standard model and is not required]
As always, should you have any further questions on this matter feel free to post me with your enquiry.Attachment #1: massMatter__weight_800x600.jpg
Hai,
Thanks for you input of the past days, as always a second-point of view always serves to help advance scientific topics (for those enlightened enough to consider another's point of view).
No man is an Island and Science should be careful to not become to dogmatic in its position on things like geometry etc, lest it run the risk of creating its own religion of black holes and multi-Verses.
Perhaps one day soon both Science and Religion will come to see they have more in common then they ever suspected - and then I pray we can move forward as Humanity in the search of more enlightened outcomes of our scientific endeavors.Attachment #1: EM_massENERGYMatter_in_motion_800x600.jpgAttachment #2: Let_there_be_Everything_800x600.jpg
If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings in the contest are calculated in the next way. Suppose your rating is [math]R_1 [/math] and [math]N_1 [/math] was the quantity of people which gave you ratings. Then you have [math]S_1=R_1 N_1 [/math] of points. After it anyone give you [math]dS [/math] of points so you have [math]S_2=S_1+ dS [/math] of points and [math]N_2=N_1+1 [/math] is the common quantity of the people which gave you ratings. At the same time you will have [math]S_2=R_2 N_2 [/math] of points. From here, if you want to be R2 > R1 there must be: [math]S_2/ N_2>S_1/ N_1 [/math] or [math] (S_1+ dS) / (N_1+1) >S_1/ N_1 [/math] or [math] dS >S_1/ N_1 =R_1[/math] In other words if you want to increase rating of anyone you must give him more points [math]dS [/math] then the participant`s rating [math]R_1 [/math] was at the moment you rated him. From here it is seen that in the contest are special rules for ratings. And from here there are misunderstanding of some participants what is happened with their ratings. Moreover since community ratings are hided some participants do not sure how increase ratings of others and gives them maximum 10 points. But in the case the scale from 1 to 10 of points do not work, and some essays are overestimated and some essays are drop down. In my opinion it is a bad problem with this Contest rating process. I hope the FQXI community will change the rating process.
You can only hope that the essays are assessed on their scientific merit and overall readability....not just their final rating.
After all don't we have enough popularity contests?
December 3, 2012, Arcadia, Michigan
Thanks for all the comments. I scanned [visual and some reading] and am impressed how much thought and art has been given. If the LA Times blog is still open, there are a few of my observations:
(1) gravity is a force that travels longitudinally along a string of equal lateral triangles (elts) with point masses of smaller elts; and, the math model is thus an regular tetrahedral.
(2) the string's origin can be connected to the Higgs Boson, conceptually, as connected to all other point particles in the universe;
(3) coordinates for taking measurements assume that the speed of light is constant at the point of measurement for the increments of time and space [special and general relativity];
(4) The Higgs Boson's concept connects "all" point masses to each other, thus I choose a helix that travels longitudinally along the string as it is displaced from a single source, or a collection of sources bound strongly to all distant distant ones (thus all others to each other);
(5) Confusion is an important life-form motivation, at the least for my way of trying to figure how things work, including body/mind;
(6) Time appears to be on the side of distance, and locally we assume Albert Einstein and others have conveyed such, perhaps because, survival is essential. Thanks prof Higgs.
Best of converging knowledge with understanding, rm
Roger,
1) Gravity is the result of vacuum energies seeking to equalise the 'null-space' lower energy densities found within all charged standing-wave energy geometries [tetrahedral Matter]
Newton modeled the motion as a force between two bodies of Matter [similar to Coulomb's Charges] whilst Einstein modeled the actual energy density gradient with his stress tensor Math.....
2) The Higgs boson is simply any ONE of the charge fascia that make up Matter geometries, with their inductive EM loop geometry giving it the property of mass
It is the motion of a Higgs inductive loop energy geometry [Matter fascia] through vacuum energy fields that creates the property of mass [inductors resist changes to their energy levels]
Each Matter fascia contains Compton frequency number of smaller elts each contributing to mass [E/c^2] with any tetrahedral arrangement of Higgs bosons creating the physical property of standing-wave Matter [E/c^4]
3) I agree - the assumption is for a 'natural' speed of light when using it as the foundation of a temporal-spatial co-ordinate system... but that system was forced onto my by the math used in relativity more than anything so I felt it wise to explain it to everyone.. besides it does help distinguish between energy in its forms of mass & Matter [c^2 vs c^4 co-ordinate systems per second]
There is much more information available now on Tumblr, YouTube and Pirate-bay to help with your understanding of these comments,.... feel free to contact me with any of your inquiries... and see the attached illustrations
Higgs Boson illustration and
Spatial co-ordinate system illustration attached
Should they fail to post (or you need a higher res copy of the same
go to Tumblr or Google and im me at Tetryonics and I re-post them there.......Attachment #1: The_HIGGS_boson_800x600.jpgAttachment #2: Tetryonics_90.05__Spatial_geometries_800x600.jpg