Dear Yuri, thanks for the link to essay 1512. indeed some âralels but paralels do not cross (perhaps in the infinite). I liked very much your essay, especially when you quote Aharonov " Everything you are going to do is already known to GOD, but you still have the choice" This is exactly what I describe when introducing Total Simultaneity, there all probabilities are "present", and every Planck moment you can make a choice between an infinity of possibillities, that need not to become "reality" , (so no multiverse), only one becomes part of your causal life-line 5that is why our universe is fine-tuned), so you could say that Total Simultaneity is GOD. That is why a lot of posts on my thread are going in this direction.

Eternal return is Immortality is another quote that i would like to comment, in our causal universe it is not nececerry that this eternal return is needed, the universe around is is a result of the interaction between our causal consciousness and the non-causal part in TS, in TS every possibillity is eternal, you could imagine that your causal consciousness is repeating the same probability for a certain causal time even infinite, but it stays causal, so with a beginning and an end, the real immortality is in TS, where all possible life-lines are eternal.

Good luck with the contest.

Wilhelmus

  • [deleted]

All solutions comes from God.

    • [deleted]

    Hi Yury,

    Nice Essay. Concerning your vision of the Universe, i.e. Big Bang; Present; Big Crunch; you could be interested to two works of mine:

    1)http://arxiv.org/abs/0802.2523, published in Gen.Rel.Grav.40, 2201-2212 (2008).

    2)http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.4801, published in Astropart.Phys.34, 587-590 (2011).

    In the first I discussed an oscillating Universe. In the second, together my collaborator H. J. Mosquera Cuesta we improved the model by showing a way to remove singularities.

    I am going to give an high score to your Essay.

    Cheers,

    Ch.

      • [deleted]

      Indeed ,but our simple human interpretations are so far of the real meaning of God, this infinite light without motions. God is the troch of all things. The spherization is his her project. It is a little if I said that the infinite light is the man, and this finite physicality tending towards the eternal physicality is the woman. It is relevant considering the polarization m/hv of evolution.

      The road is the pure optimization spherization. God is more than our simple human interpretations. It is above our understanding. The real secret is this universal love. We optimize, we improve, we create, we harmonize, we catalyze,we love, we accept, we continue, we live ....

      Best Regards

      • [deleted]

      It was me the young crazy.

      • [deleted]

      Thank you Christian....I will read your articles.

      Dear Yuri, I read your essay with attention.

      My thought of physics is based on maintaining a balance between theory and empirical facts.

      On this basis, there are points of your essay in which I fully agree:

      4D space is not continuous, if not discrete, quantized. But a space quantization inevitably leads to a minimum quantization time lapse. Heisenberg uncertainty principle, the absence of infinite oscillators, which invalidated the approximate mathematical method, not with physical reality, the infinite sum of Feynman paths, since the lack of an infinite amount of energy, forced to invent the method of renormalization. Method that bases its predictive success, a mathematical equivalence between the quantization of spacetime-mass and the renormalization Riemann zeta function.

      I disagree, with all due respect to his work: gravitation is quite possibly the most fundamental force.

      But you, makes observations on a general two-dimensional holography, which I find quite agree with the actual physical facts.

      I mean the dimension two, or surfaces have the property to contain any information of higher dimensions, since for a d dimensional sphere is satisfied:

      [math]x_{1}^{2}+x_{2}^{2}+...-x_{d+1}^{2}=0[/math]

      There are theoretical indications (string theory) and experimental very strong, which seem to show this basic and fundamental holography in two-dimensional surfaces.

      Some theoretical and experimental indicators:

      -The dimensionless factor of the entropy of a black hole

      [math]\frac{A}{4l_{p}^{2}}=\frac{4\pi r^{2}}{4l_{p}^{2}}\:;\: r=l_{p}

      [/math]

      Casimir force:

      [math]\left(\frac{S_{BH}(r=l_{p})}{k}\right)^{2}\frac{\hbar c}{K(8d)a^{4}}=F_{casimir}

      [/math]

      The graviton, must necessarily exist. Experimentally the energy loss of high speed orbital systems, pulsars, indicating a loss of energy consistent with the predictions of general relativity, and due to the emission of gravitational waves.

      Moreover, the so-called, big crunch, is purely an idea, without any experimental minimal support, direct or indirect.

      By contrast, the inflaction, yes, is based on a theoretical and experimental basis

      More specifically: if space-time dimensions and mass are completely equivalent, then it can be shown that the so-called Hubble constant, is actually the inverse of the twice frequency of the cosmological vacuum energy.

      The scaling law in this case inflaction factor, must meet two basic requirements:

      1) This factor must be a direct function of the value twice of the cosmological vacuum energy, with respect to the change of scale with reference to the maximum mass scale: the Planck mass

      2) This same factor will always be at least equal to the fine structure constant, alpha, for zero momentum. This last fact ensures the separation point of the matter-coupling electromagnetic radiation (microwave background of the universe), in early universe.

      The Hubble constant, or frequency of "negative" energy, repulsive, the cosmological vacuum, obeys a simple second order differential equation, which in turn directly implies a twice scaling factor volume of a sphere in four dimensions, his beloved 4d sphere, dear Yuri.

      This dimensionless factor has a product factor, which is the length Planckian associated due to the fine structure constant, zero momentum

      In short, an equation can be worth a thousand words:

      [math]l_{\gamma}=\sqrt{\frac{\alpha^{-1}}{4\pi}}=3.3022686622801

      [/math]

      [math]H_{0}=l_{\gamma}\cdot t_{p}\cdot\exp(\exp(\pi^{2}/2))

      [/math]

      [math]Planck\: time=t_{p}=l_{p}/c=5.391238134E-44\: s

      [/math]

      [math]H_{0}=2.3054E-18\: s^{-1}

      [/math]

      [math]

      vacuum\: energy=(1/2)\cdot m_{Planck}c^{2}\cdot\exp-\{[\exp(\pi^{2}/2)+\ln(l_{\gamma})]/2\}

      [/math]

      [math](1/2)\cdot m_{Planck}c^{2}\cdot\exp-\{[\exp(\pi^{2}/2)+\ln(l_{\gamma})]/2\}\rightarrow2.1521E-3\: ev

      [/math]

      I was very pleasantly surprised, its discovery, the pattern of pseudo scalar mesons, that having zero spin, this pattern must have a clear relationship with the vacuum Higss, among other things

      Always be learning new things, thankfully

      In general, your essay seems interesting and worthwhile

      Thank you very much, Yuri¡¡

      • [deleted]

      Hi Yuri,

      I haven't had time to fully understand your essay yet, but I do like the idea of circular time. I once read a book called Transcendent by Stephen Baxter that goes pretty deep into the consequences of circular time. Perhaps you may like it, if you haven't already read it. Of course, there is also Stephen King's The Dark Tower series, which frequently states that "Ka is like a wheel".

      - Shawn

        • [deleted]

        Thank you for attention...

        • [deleted]

        Well, as long as you don't make a frequent habit out of putting some random stranger in-between us by asking them for a negative opinion on my essay or my taste in fiction, then I suppose you're quite welcome.

        - Shawn

        • [deleted]

        Appendix 4

        See Appendix 1

        All these data can be interpreted as:

        No expanding Universe, only shrinking space.

        • [deleted]

        Acсelerating No. Decelerating Yes.

        • [deleted]

        Conclusion:

        Wrong ratio 3:1; Energy:Matter;

        Right ratio 3:1; Matter:Energy.

        • [deleted]

        Hey Yuri,

        You started explaining your theory on my page, but you didn't finish. It would be most helpful if you used that opportunity to help everyone see your point of view clearly by writing a guide, rather than just use it to spam everyone with random numbers.

        - Shawn

        • [deleted]

        Halayka

        Could you please read again my essay with all my comments?

        For best understanding also please read my last contest essay.

        All the best.

        Hello Yuri. English I do not know and have not read your essay. Tried to understand the annotations and comments. Your suggestions can be implemented by writing metaphysical books. Only one space. Time is of simultaneity. Measure the space required. Content can be measured. All types of energy comes from the heat and all kinds of material - from the information. Gravity does not have neither heat nor the information (structure). She comes to the origin of the heat. Complete thermodynamic formula M.Plank in MDM, he found the quantum of action, analyze not yet started. Since metaphysics can find in my essay.

        Information-Energy Quantum Balance by Vasily Kletshkin

        14 posts • created by Vasily Kletshkin • Aug. 30, 2012 @ 12:08 GMT

        • [deleted]

        Василий

        Не верю,что без знания английского можно выступить с опровержением каких-либо постулатов физики.

        Извините....

        Dear Yuri,

        I want add information about Planck units according to the Theory of Infinite Hierarchical Nesting of Matter (my Essay). About the meaning of the Planck length. It is close to radius of particles (praons) which relate to nucleon in the same way as nucleons relate to neutron star. It is supposed that in neutron as much praons as neutrons in the neutron star. Now about Planck mass. From the theory it follows that Planck mass is equal to product of proton mass and similarity coefficient in size between star and atomic levels of matter. So the Planck mass is not a mass of real particle, since there is should be similarity coefficient in mass, not similarity coefficient in size.

        Sergey Fedosin

          • [deleted]

          For better clarification my approach

          I sending to you Frank Wilczek's 3 keen articles

          http://ctpweb.lns.mit.edu/physics_today/phystoday/Abs_limits388.pdf

          http://ctpweb.lns.mit.edu/physics_today/phystoday/Abs_limits393.pdf

          http://ctpweb.lns.mit.edu/physics_today/phystoday/Abs_limits400.pdf

          • [deleted]

          Confirmation of lower limit velocity of light

          http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1209/1209.3765.pdf