Go Beyond Einstein’s Constant Light Speed! by Nimit Theeraleekul

Nimit:

You rationalize the constancy of mass independent of it's motion well. I am always bothered by including kinetic energy as "the" explanation.

Yet, somehow the focus on motion always avoids the concomitant problem of growth. There is more to the world than physical energy.

Perhaps you may consider?Point of essay (vote high!, thanks) is based on

(1) Light "energy" seeks surface area of mass that mediates charge motions while

(2) Gravity is a content of mass phenomena that seeks time to exist by growth.

To Seek Unknown Shores

聽聽 http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1409

It seems your essay did not follow rules of FQXi for submission.. Good Luck!!

Great thoughts, Nimit.

I have such questions I have puzzled over, that relate to my essay:

1) Is a photon of light always without mass?

2) If something is rendered massless, does its mass increase at near light speed?

Jim

Dear Jim,

1) Actually photon does have mass, but conventionally in physics it was treated as energy! The reason behind is because it is the mass of part of the vibrating medium which acts as the carrier of light wave packet (photon). This is why it was said that light cannot stop, because if it stops, then there is no light (i.e. no vibration part of medium)!

2) There is no such thing which is - massless, because no mass (or energy) means no anything!

By the way, it is very instructive to consider the behavior of sound wave as an analogy, indeed! Please see detail in the paper - Completed Maxwell electromagnetic field theory, in my website.

Sincerely,

Nimit

Dear Nimit,

You have a lot of questions.1). For the model of photon as a particle in fluxes of gravitons see the paper: Fedosin S.G. Cosmic Red Shift, Microwave Background, and New Particles. Galilean Electrodynamics, Spring 2012, Vol. 23, Special Issues No. 1, P. 3 - 13. About speed of light in Michelson-Morley interference experiment see Metric theory of relativity. 2). In two-solenoid experiment the energy of magnetic field is spent to work against of force repelling the solenoids. If solenoids are coincide and then the current turn on the work is done by sources of currents. 3). The vacuum medium may be fluxes of gravitons, see Fedosin S.G. Model of Gravitational Interaction in the Concept of Gravitons. Journal of Vectorial Relativity, March 2009, Vol. 4, No. 1, P.1-24. 4). Origin of matter is the same at all level of matter. See Infinite Hierarchical Nesting of Matter and Similarity of matter levels. 6).The privileged reference frame is used also in Extended special theory of relativity. 8). Of course Lorentz transformations are connected to constancy of speed of light in inertial systems and to retarded time and position of charges in motion. But why the postulate of constancy of speed of light in inertial systems was chosen? It is simply convention which is necessary for measurements of time and lengths with the help of electromagnetic wave in all inertial systems using two-directional motion of light during of measurements. And the time dilation is absolute effect which is measured by atomic clocks. 9). I agree in that force of inertia is due to resistive reaction of vacuum medium i.e. gravitons fluxes. But `increasing of mass` is a result of the postulate of constancy of speed of light in inertial systems only. In reality mass as scalar is a constant in every inertial system, and Lorentz factor is from relativity. About the model of electron you can see in § 14 of the book: Fedosin S.G. The physical theories and infinite nesting of matter. Perm: S.G. Fedosin, 2009-2012, 858 p. ISBN 978-5-9901951-1-0.

Sergey Fedosin

Dear Serqey Fedosin,

1) The crucial problem about the graviton is that it is just a proposed hypothesis which not yet discovered!

2) You said that - In two-solenoid experiment the energy of magnetic field is spent to work against of force repelling the solenoids. Then how could you explain in the case which both the feeding currents have the same polarity (in which the magnetic field is double)?

3) How could you prove that - The vacuum medium may be fluxes of gravitons ?

4) What is the mechanism, such as why and how electron attracts proton in the process of - Origin of matter is the same at all level of matter?

The remain problems will be answer latter.

Sincerely,

Nimit

Dear Serqey Fedosin,

Here are the answers to the remained problems.

6) How could you prove the existence of the privileged reference frame in your theory?

8) You said that - the time dilation is absolute effect which is measured by atomic clocks. What is its physical mechanism?

9) You said that - increasing of mass` is a result of the postulate of constancy of speed of light in inertial systems only. The problem is what is its mechanism?

Sincerely,

Nimit

Dear Nimit,

Here are my answers. 1). The gravitons are in accordance with the Le Sages theory of gravitation. The gravitons in the Infinite Hierarchical Nesting of Matter may be particles similar to neutrino, photons and cosmic rays. But these particles are mach more less then usual particles since they are born at low levels of matter. How can we discover such particles? At the moment it is possible only predict them. 2). If two solenoids oriented in such way that they attract each other it means that the energy for such action is taken from sources of currents in the solenoids. And the energy be other in the case when the solenoids have opposite orientation. 3). The vacuum medium may be fluxes of gravitons - it is an axiom of Le Sages theory of gravitation taken without proving. 4). In the atom there are 4 forces at the electron: strong gravitation, centripetal force of rotation of substance of electron in the form of disk around the nucleus, electric force between nucleus and charged substance of electron disk, electric force of repulsion of charged substance of electron disk from its own parts. 6). The existence of the privileged reference frame is an axiom of Extended special theory of relativity. So it is not necessary to prove it. 8). The physical mechanism of time dilation may be connected with some effects. For example with the retarded time in Liénard-Wiechert potential for the charge in motion We see time dilation also in wave clocks in which light moves between two glasses perpendicular to motion of clocks. If we use convention of constancy of speed of light then we can use electromagnetic wave equation for potentials in the same form in all reference frame. 9). In reality there is not increasing of mass. The mass and the charge of particle are constant in special relativity. The more energy the more speed the more Lorentz factor but mass is constant.

Sergey Fedosin

http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.3765

Dear Yyri Danoyan,

I cannot find http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.3765, please check it?

Sincerely,

Nimit

Is there Lower Limit to Velocity or Velocity Change?

Try again....

Dear Nimit,

I think that in the case when both solenoids coincide their common magnetic field may be zero or doubled according to polarity of their currents. It is a superposition principle for fields. Sergey Fedosin

After studying about 250 essays in this contest, I realize now, how can I assess the level of each submitted work. Accordingly, I rated some essays, including yours.

Cood luck.

Sergey Fedosin

If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings in the contest are calculated in the next way. Suppose your rating is [math]R_1 [/math] and [math]N_1 [/math] was the quantity of people which gave you ratings. Then you have [math]S_1=R_1 N_1 [/math] of points. After it anyone give you [math]dS [/math] of points so you have [math]S_2=S_1+ dS [/math] of points and [math]N_2=N_1+1 [/math] is the common quantity of the people which gave you ratings. At the same time you will have [math]S_2=R_2 N_2 [/math] of points. From here, if you want to be R2 > R1 there must be: [math]S_2/ N_2>S_1/ N_1 [/math] or [math] (S_1+ dS) / (N_1+1) >S_1/ N_1 [/math] or [math] dS >S_1/ N_1 =R_1[/math] In other words if you want to increase rating of anyone you must give him more points [math]dS [/math] then the participant`s rating [math]R_1 [/math] was at the moment you rated him. From here it is seen that in the contest are special rules for ratings. And from here there are misunderstanding of some participants what is happened with their ratings. Moreover since community ratings are hided some participants do not sure how increase ratings of others and gives them maximum 10 points. But in the case the scale from 1 to 10 of points do not work, and some essays are overestimated and some essays are drop down. In my opinion it is a bad problem with this Contest rating process. I hope the FQXI community will change the rating process.

Sergey Fedosin

Dear Serqey Fedosin,

Thanks for your information about the rating process. Indeed, for me I am not so interest in it (community rating), even it has some effect for the contest. What interests me is the rule which was written, in which I will give the credit to the evaluation committee for their judgment.

Sincerely,

Nimit