Hubble Redshift Despite Universal Contraction is possible. by Leo Vuyk

Dear snp,

Thank you for your reaction.

Your first question: These Galaxy centres can be called DENSEMASSES?

answ:

I realize that for professionals it will be hard to change an old paradigm about GIANT central black holes.

However My new paradigm black hole is reason for external located Giant black holes in double cone shape and a what I call a "WHITE HOLE" in the galaxy centre as the origin of vacuum vector field polarization .

For the white hole see:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/8615315975/in/set-72157633194972754

See also: two Chandra images of M82 with external x ray point sources (GABHs) grouped into two double cones more or less perpendicular oriented to each other.

Interestingly, also the Chandra team reported that M82 has only medium sized black holes in its center. See under arrow [A] in the next figure.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/8672492330/in/photostream

Your 2e question: difference between top and bottom cones?

Answ:

I do not remember that I made that difference.

My picture is that the dark matter distribution around and inside our own galaxy influences ( increase) strongly the redshift

My quantum FFF model says that the raspberry shaped multiverse is a pulsating mechanism.

So if we see now large numbers of blue shifted sources, the you may argue that our universe is in the CONTRACTION PHASE ALREADY if we are able to find enough blue shifted sources spread over the hemispheres.

SECOND: Dark matter black holes in and outside all galaxies and many stars are the origin of redshift influence of background sources passing by these galaxies and galaxy clusters. Light rays that not have to travel along these dark matter areas are not influenced by it. They will show a blueshift in a contracting universe..

SO sources that are far away have statistically more chance to be redshifted than nearby sources.

See ;Merging spirals into Lenticular- and Elliptical galaxies.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/8614005013/in/photostream/

Your 3e questionz; Blue shifted Galaxies exist at larger distances also...what do you say?

Answ.

See before; SO sources that are far away have statistically more chance to be redshifted than nearby sources.

THIS is supposed to be the origin that distant sources have statistical more redshift.

But this can NOT be interpreted as the acceleration of universal expansion.

For more on the Quantum FFF model:

http://vixra.org/author/leo_vuyk

Dear Snp,

For the contraction phase in a bouncing multiverse see perhaps my Vixra essay called:

New Dark Matter Black Holes and a New Dark Energy Higgs Field, lead to

a Bouncing CP symmetrical Multiverse, and new experiments.

http://vixra.org/pdf/1209.0092v1.pdf

Indeed also computer graphics could be described in computer language.

However most of my graphics are based on the use of ink and pen .

see attachmentsAttachment #1: Quantum_gravity_S.jpgAttachment #2: Origin_of_synchrotron_radiation_S.jpg

Dear Leo,

I did not get any answer for my question from your replies. . . . .

. . . . . According to your theory how many Blue shifted Galaxies exist? Blue shifted Galaxies exist at larger distances also...what do you say? . . . . . .

Dear snp,

Sorry I was not aware of that.

After a period of inflation in my theory the universe(multiverse) is contracting as a whole.

SO ALL GALAXIES SHOULD BE BLUE SHIFTED.

Nxt reply I will show you the eppropriate grafic.

See the "PUSATING RASPBERRY MULTIVERSE"

http://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/sets/72157633110603216/

Hi Leo,

"If I can't picture it, I can't understand it." This sentence is attributed to Einstein by physicist J. A. Wheeler in John Horgan's article "Profile: Physicist John A. Wheeler, Questioning the 'It from Bit'". Scientific American, pp. 36-37, June 1991.

Probably your and also my understanding of the first steps in physics is similar. I does not matter that our detailed concepts are quite different. And by the way: I admire your graphics!

In your essay I can see something deep and true (in my opinion) in the approach itself: the mystery of Reality lies in geometry. Even in biology or rather biochemistry the shape is what decides if the reaction will happen or not. E.g. in every cell of an organism there is a lot of chemicals but reactions happen sporadically. The increase in rate of a chemical reaction (a tangible effect) can happen only due to the participation of a substance called a catalyst. The catalysts simply have the proper shape that fits to the other shapes. They are called enzymes - selective catalysts, vastly accelerating both the rate and specificity of metabolic reactions (e.g. the digestion of food or the synthesis of DNA). And most of them are proteins.

Nevertheless if I could advice you anything: do not underestimate the abilities of mathematics. The same Einstein said: "Thoughts and ideas, not formulae, are the beginning of every physical theory. The ideas must later take the mathematical form of a quantitative theory, to make possible the comparison with experiment"

Regards

Thans you JAcek,

als an architect , I ma not ABLE to design à math systeem for my 3D gemotiveerd partiële systeem.

perhaps you are?

If Dark matter Black Holes EAT the energetic oscillating Higgs vacuum (dark energy) then we may expect that the vacuum to become deluted and will schrinck in volume.

The universe is schricking by the continuous absorption of the vacuum dark energy Higgs lattice by dark matter black holes.

leading to a concentration of black holes in the centre and a BIG CRUNCH! The Big Bang wll start with the splitting and evaporation of the B Crunch Black Hole the origin of a sol called fractal inflation of the whole raspberry shaped multiverse.

THEN hydrogen start to be produced around individual Bhs .

stars are formed in between two or even more dumbbell black holes by birkeland and Alfven acceleration.

Conclusion, after the fractal inflation of the Lyman Alpha structure of black hole dumbbell systems the Universe starts TO PRODUCE HYDROGEN AND start to CONTRACT !

Dear Leo Vuyk,

Your article is well in accordance with my work on an alternative cosmology, in that the tetrahedral-brane structure by eigen-rotational string-matter segments is in analogue with the Chiral Tetrahedral Vacuum Lattice you are describing; though there are contradictions on the basic structure of matter. Your perception on oscillating energy of super dense but massless Higgs vacuum is in analogous with the Vacuua within tetrahedral-branes described in this paradigm. But the problem is, how it is possible to evolve 3D structures from zero dimensional particles. Higgs bosons are virtual and its detection is derived from binary bits and thus further developments have expectations to conclude string like structure of matter, that may be from Parton model of Feynman. In relevant to this, my article is on development and shall let you know on publishing in this contest, for mutual benefits.

With best wishes

Jayakar

Sorry Jacek for the typing errors before.

for my 3D particle system see:

http://vixra.org/abs/1103.0002

3 Dimensional String Based Alternative Particles Model

Best wishes,

Leo Vuyk.

As a consequence of the cyclic multiverse, there is also a cyclic TIME!

see the image below:

The yellow line in the image represents the number of oscillating Higgs particles building the volume of the myltiverse.

Oscillating Higgs particles are responsible for the dark energy. and for a local reference frame with it own local space TIME.

Local space TIME is the ticking of a local clock based on the jitter of the local atoms pushed around by the oscillating Higgs system (lattice).

All motion related to this reference frame creates time retardation. (in accord with Einstein)Attachment #1: 8596358017_3aed380688_b1.jpg

First sign of DARK MATTER in the lab. So called "Quantum Knots" seem to resemble nano black holes which seem to be too small to "eat the vacuum"and evaporate by the fierce Higgs oscillations of the vacuum.see attachment

Left: internal Silicon globule structure made by CT nano scan at the University of Eindhoven (NL) Internal hollow channels are observed. According to Quantum FFF theory these channels are postulated to be left behind by travelling and evaporating "Quantum Knots". Right: Details of the internal structure of the silicon globule, with two different measurements: by SEM imaging (grey color) and EBSD imaging (colored inset) also by TU EindhovenAttachment #1: 8592347326_9fafbac1c6_h1.jpg

First oscillating Higgs Dark Energy vector field explanation of the Shnoll effect.see image.

First oscillating Higgs Dark Energy vector field explanation of the Shnoll effect.see imageAttachment #1: shnoll_polar_star_1sm.jpg

If the dark matter Higgs vacuum particle has the torus form with internal equaly shaped 4x quarter parts with a macaroni shape, then we may call these parts 4 dimensions.

If those 4 parts are connected by three hinges, able to rotate TWO adjacent macaroni quarter parts over 90 degree click rotations, the we may count: 3x4= 12 extra dimensions.

Conclusion, the Higgs torus particle has 12+4=16 dimensions, a 16 dimension torus system, to be able to form 64 alternative particles or strings.

"It is well accepted that the Hubble redshift is a sign for Universal expansion...."

Only if new testing is ignored.... Experiments with hot sparse plasma - such as exists in the coronana of the Sun and every star - have simulated the cosmic galactic redshifts

"DM causes redshift ... we don't know if universe expands or contracts"

Plasma redshift explains the solar redshifts, the redshifts of the galactic corona, the cosmological redshifts, the cosmic microwave background, and the X-ray background. The plasma redshift explains the observed magnitude-redshift relation for supernovae SNe Ia without the big bang, dark matter, or dark energy.

http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0401420v3.pdf

Dear Robert,

Thank you very much , i was not aware of that article.

These measurements are indeed a strong support for dark matter based redshift as I postulate in my FQXi essay.

However it is all in the details off course.

In my essay, Not the dark matter itself (external galaxy black holes) but the vacuum lattice density decrease by Drak Matter black holes should be the origin of the redshift.

And as a logic result of my model, we live in a cyclic universe (pulsating)

After a so called fractal Inflation of the BB black hole evaporation the universe will start to contract again by the consumption of all these Bhs of the vacuum lattice.

for a quick scan of my models, see:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/sets/

For more details look at Vixra "lao Vuyk".

Leo,

Dark Matter is not directly observable, by definition, but plasma is. So either there is no DM, or it's not plasma.

Another issue... if red shifts are partially caused by hot plasma and Doppler motion, the distance and radial speed of the stars can't be discerned unless the ratio is known. The universe could be expanding, contracting or static.

Robert