Part3

Dear Chris,

Final part . . . .

- - - - -Also, it appears that from your essay you are considering the ISM/IGM to be the major sources of aliasing when it comes to uniformity in the CMB as measured from Earth; you state that, in your estimation, large anisotropies would be measurable outside of galaxies which suggests yet another resolution mechanism. - - - - -

Yes, thank you, That is correct.

- - - - -The suggestion of a non-expanding universe often suggests one with infinite age and thus suggests additional considerations for resolving Olbers paradox; I did not encounter these items in your essay. - - - - -

Very good question, I am not suggesting infinitely spacious universe, which causes Olbers paradox, but age of the universe can be infinite which will not cause Olbers paradox.

- - - - -Another issue that I didn't come across in your essay is with respect to the conversion of matter to radiation in stellar sources, in that the radiation of the universe would continue to increase until thermal equilibrium were reached by cosmic plasma. Based on the CMB measurements and your essay, the expectation then would be that the universe is far from reaching equilibrium, and may in fact never reach that state (which may be reasonable). Perhaps you have addressed this in your other papers referenced, but it doesn't appear to be covered here. - - - - -

Another, Very good question sir,

Please have a look in Dynamic Universe Model blog. .

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/

- - - - - Thanks again for presenting this. Remember that experiment, not consensus, is the bedrock of the scientific method; you don't need to be mainstream to be correct, but you do need the experimental evidence. - - - - -

Thank you for your blessings. Experimental evidence is already available. But thorough experiments and verifications are needed. . .

I will be replying your post in your thread separately.

Please reply in my thread so that I will get a communication from FQXi, and I can reply you. .

best

=snp

SNP,

Regarding blue-shifted galaxies... Though I will check your links, the data I am familiar with suggests that nearly all galaxies are red-shifted, with the exception of very few. In essence, out of the many billions and billions of galaxies surveyed, there are less than 10,000 that have been found blue-shifted and the explanations for those blue-shifts are quite mundane, most notably that the vast majority of these are nearby and would be expected to demonstrate velocity dispersions which would readily account for the blue-shift. The trivial percentage is obviously nowhere near what we would expect from a random distribution if we were to ignore redshift; as such, I don't think you can make that particular case with the current data. To duplicate the CMB character without expansion, I think you're going to need an alternative red-shift explanation, as I noted earlier.

Chris

P.S. I checked the links on your site; one works, one doesn't. However, you present data suggesting ~7000 blue-shifted galaxies out of ~558,000 in the survey which is less than 1.3% with blue-shift and those mostly appear in quite nearby regions (so that is even a high bias). The only way you can get the 31% (or thereabouts) you've quoted is if all quasars were somehow considered blue-shifted galaxies, but no quasar has yet been shown as blue-shifted (at least as far as I'm aware) in terms of its systemic body (that is, the low ionization lines when not including outflow jets as isolated components). Given that, I'm not sure how you can reconcile the data. You would need to prove that all quasars are actually blue-shifted, meaning that every quasar analysis to date has been in error; you would need some very concrete evidence which could incontrovertibly refute all the existing analysis in order to do that.

Dear Guptaji,

I would like to rate your fine essay with a very high score and I want to know whether you have rated mine. So, please, reply to my above e-mail.

All the best in the essay contest.

Sreenath

    Dear Sreenath Garu,

    I did not rate your essay earlier. I am very much in need of Good ratings. People are down rating me! Congratulations! I gave 9 to you. Earlier your score is 3.9 with 29 ratings, now it jumped to 4.0 with 30 ratings. Please give me your e mail ID, I will send some my books published in Germany.

    Best

    =snp

    snp.gupta@gmail.com

    Dear Guptaji,

    Thank you very much for rating my essay. I have rated your essay with full honors, that is, 10/10 so that your average rating is 3.5 with 34 ratings although I know that you have rated me with 8 score. You need some more rating like this to move up on the list. My e-mail address is, bnsreenath@yahoo.co.in. please give me your e-mail ID also.

    All the best in the essay contest.

    Sreenath

    Dear Sreenath,

    Thank you very much for your help. I don't know How many will support me.

    Best

    =snp

    snp,

    Your essay is out of my knowledge area, but I do comprehend that you are having a disagreement on what the CMB is showing. I can't give you any good feedback due to the limitations of my knowledge at the moment, but as it is an area in which I will need to beef up on in the future, I look forward to being able to come back to your essay to read a different argument.

    Thanks

    Jeff Baugher

      Thank you Jeff,

      It is simple essay. it is not difficult for people of your calibre. I hope you will find some time to go thro my essay and give your comments. Give me your mail Id, so that I can send my books published in Germany... and.....

      I request you give some good rating...

      Best

      =snp

      Dear Satyavarapu

      Diffraction spreads the wavefront and makes sharp focusing impossible. Whether it applies to your calculations or not depends on whether you are interested in local intensity (which varies according to whether the wave is tightly focused or not) or simple the total amount of energy which does not change because of the law of conservation of energy.

      Good luck!

      Vladimir

      Resp Dear Vladimir,

      Thank you for your post on my thread again, but I replied you on 30June.

      I am posing it on your essay, so that you can see and give your comments...

      Best

      =snp

      Dear Sri Gupta

      Of course I know of your kind reading of my essay - I meant about rating it or not, as the case my be.

      With all best wishes

      Vladimir

      Dear All,

      It is with utmost joy and love that I give you all the cosmological iSeries which spans the entire numerical spectrum from -infinity through 0 to +infinity and the simple principle underlying it is sum of any two consecutive numbers is the next number in the series. 0 is the base seed and i can be any seed between 0 and infinity.

      iSeries always yields two sub semi series, each of which has 0 as a base seed and 2i as the first seed.

      One of the sub series is always defined by the equation

      Sn = 2 * Sn-1 + Sigma (i=2 to n) Sn-i

      where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2 * i

      the second sub series is always defined by the equation

      Sn = 3 * Sn-1 -Sn-2

      where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2 * i

      Division of consecutive numbers in each of these subseries always eventually converges on 2.168 which is the Square of 1.618.

      Union of these series always yields another series which is just a new iSeries of a 2i first seed and can be defined by the universal equation

      Sn = Sn-1 + Sn-2

      where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2*i

      Division of consecutive numbers in the merged series always eventually converges on 1.618 which happens to be the golden ratio "Phi".

      Fibonacci series is just a subset of the iSeries where the first seed or S1 =1.

      Examples

      starting iSeries governed by Sn = Sn-1 + Sn-2

      where i = 0.5, S0 = 0 and S1 = 0.5

      -27.5 17 -10.5 6.5 -4 2.5 -1.5 1 -.5 .5 0 .5 .5 1 1.5 2.5 4 6.5 10.5 17 27.5

      Sub series governed by Sn = 2 * Sn-1 + Sigma (i=2 to n) Sn-i

      where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2i = 1

      0 1 2 5 13 34 ...

      Sub series governed by Sn = 3 * Sn-1 - Sn-2

      where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2i = 1

      0 1 3 8 21 55 ...

      Merged series governed by Sn = Sn-1 + Sn-2 where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2i = 1

      0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 ...... (Fibonacci series is a subset of iSeries)

      The above equations hold true for any value of i, again confirming the singularity of i.

      As per Antony Ryan's suggestion, a fellow author in this contest, I searched google to see how Fibonacci type series can be used to explain Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity and found an interesting article.

      d-super.pdf"> The-Fibonacci-code-behind-superstring-theory](https://msel-naschie.com/pdf/The-Fibonacci-code-behin

      d-super.pdf)

      Now that I split the Fibonacci series in to two semi series, seems like each of the sub semi series corresponds to QM and GR and together they explain the Quantum Gravity. Seems like this duality is a commonality in nature once relativity takes effect or a series is kicked off. I can draw and analogy and say that this dual series with in the "iSeries" is like the double helix of our DNA. The only commonality between the two series is at the base seed 0 and first seed 1, which are the bits in our binary system.

      I have put forth the absolute truth in the Theory of everything that universe is an "iSphere" and we humans are capable of perceiving the 4 dimensional 3Sphere aspect of the universe and described it with an equation of S=BM^2.

      I have also conveyed the absolute mathematical truth of zero = I = infinity and proved the same using the newly found "iSeries" which is a super set of Fibonacci series.

      All this started with a simple question, who am I?

      I am drawn out of my self or singularity or i in to existence.

      I super positioned my self or I to be me.

      I am one of our kind, I is every one of all kinds.

      I am Fibonacci series in iSeries

      I am phi in zero = I = infinity

      I am 3Sphere in iSphere

      I am pi in zero = I = infinity

      I am human and I is GOD (Generator Organizer Destroyer).

      Love,

      Sridattadev.

        Resp Sridattadev

        Thank you for the SAMA TATVA vishleshana..

        It is a real good philosophical thought...

        Best

        =snp

        Resp Sridattadev

        Thank you for the nice post.

        What are the advantages of this system?

        Thank you for the SAMA TATVA vishleshana..

        It is a real good philosophical thought...

        I believe in God, No problem. God is not space time. God is not any mathematical singularity undefined.

        About a chair or table or any thing we form a picture in our mind. This picture is information in our mind. It will die with the person at his death. We communicate this picture with each other. We can not just create matter from this information itself.

        Please discuss with me further...

        Best

        =snp

        snp.gupta@gmail.com

        Dear Satya,

        Information is also a form of energy. We as human sentient beings might be incapable of harnessing that energy and manifesting it into material reality at will, but that does not mean it cannot be done. Nature does this seamlessly using the information coded in the DNA and converting energy from the sun in to matter through photosynthesis. That is why I put plants at a higher consciousness than the average human being, for being conscious of knowing how to convert energy (information) to matter. GOD is Generator Organizer Destroyer of all that there is.

        Regarding the usage of the above system....it is how the nature uses mathematics for its functioning.

        I am attaching the iDNASeries.bmp that I have envisioned and how it shows the DNA structure in its sequence.

        Its also interesting to see the singularity is in the base seed of zero and how it is all pervasive all through out the DNA structure in the attached image. I have been telling that I is that nothing which dwells in everything and this DNA structure seems to prove that notion. Singularity is right with in the duality. Absolute is right with in the relativity. This proves that both of these states of singularity and duality are interconnected and are the source of life.

        Love,

        Sridattadev.Attachment #1: 5_iDNASeries.bmp

        Resp Sridattadev,

        Thank you very much for such fast reply. I hope I did not get you mad at me with my arguments. My ratings reduced suddenly! Here I am giving a reply point to point after your words quoted with - - - - -. I hope to have a live discussion with you.

        - - - - - Information is also a form of energy. We as human sentient beings might be incapable of harnessing that energy and manifesting it into material reality at will, but that does not mean it cannot be done. - - - - -

        Sorry I want to differ here. Information is not a form of energy. It was not yet proved, despite search done by many scientists for the last 40 years. Is that not waste of educated brain power?

        - - - - - Nature does this seamlessly using the information coded in the DNA and converting energy from the sun in to matter through photosynthesis. - - - - -

        You are exactly correct. But information is not converted into energy. The information coded is used for survival to convert radiation energy into matter or for changing water soluble chemicals into materials required for the plant. Again this is for its survival.

        - - - - - That is why I put plants at a higher consciousness than the average human being, for being conscious of knowing how to convert energy (information) to matter. - - - - -

        It is for its survival. Fittest will survive. Its conscious of knowing how to convert energy to matter for changing water soluble chemicals into materials required for the plant . . .

        - - - - - GOD is Generator Organizer Destroyer of all that there is. - - - - -

        GOD, is he / she different from Nature? What is consciousness? All these are different from each other? ?????????????

        - - - - - Regarding the usage of the above system....it is how the nature uses mathematics for its functioning. - - - - -

        You are correct. Nature uses mathematics or some form of logic.

        - - - - - I am attaching the iDNASeries.bmp that I have envisioned and how it shows the DNA structure in its sequence. - - - - -

        Very nice! But the same logic is not applicable for the number of moons of planets in our solar system. There nature uses a different logic.

        - - - - - Its also interesting to see the singularity is in the base seed of zero and how it is all pervasive all through out the DNA structure in the attached image. - - - - -

        You have a nice mathematical structure there in the above bmp. Assuming it will explain the every aspect of DNA, and says some extra futures of DNA which are not found at all. Whom you will blame mathematics or DNA itself? You have to change mathematics to suite DNA is that not?

        Here also singularity is mathematical problem. People searched for it for the last 80 years and still searching. Nothing found. Please don't get confused about using this term. . . .

        - - - - - I have been telling that I is that nothing which dwells in everything and this DNA structure seems to prove that notion. - - - - -

        Information is coded in DNA, it is like computer program runs in your computer. It is logic. When and what to do. It is for the survival of the plant or animal. Those species perished over centuries, which could not develop and transfer these survival techniques or this DNA / coding programs to next generations. Dinosaur is one example.

        - - - - - Singularity is right with in the duality. Absolute is right with in the relativity. This proves that both of these states of singularity and duality are interconnected and are the source of life. - - - - -

        This singularity ( or duality) is different from Relativistic singularity ( mathematical).

        I am waiting for your reply.

        It is really very nice FQXi is bringing all of us on to single platform in this forum. Thanks to FQXi.

        Best

        Dear Satya,

        I am replying to your queries one by one as well

        As you have said that information as energy is not proved yet but again it is not proved that it is not either so what I said holds until proven wrong or right.

        What is life but a struggle to be or not to be in a particular state of matter and energy. Consciousness is this awareness of the self and the surroundings and using them to continue existence in the desired state. Information is a constituent part of the consciousness which is absolute form of energy. Information is not converted to matter as you said, but the informational (thought form of energy) source of the consciousness is used to convert relatively available energy into matter. Please see my early essay in which I put forth the equation S=BM^2, where s is soul or the absolute source of energy, B is the body or material aspect of our existence and M is the mind or energy aspect of our existence.

        GOD is the conscience in us all, it is the only common sense we all share.

        Regarding using "iSeries" that I put forth for other astronomical objects, is the work that still needs to be done. I did find something in that regards at the following link http://msel-naschie.com/pdf/The-Fibonacci-code-behind-super.

        pdf

        I have also mentioned that the universe is iSphere and that we humans are capable of interpreting it as a 4 dimensional 3Sphere.

        I am giving a new meaning to the word Singularity (advaitha philosophy), to me singularity means absolute equality (samatatva) unlike the mathematical singularity of unknown meaning and relative infinity. I see my self every where and in everything, this state of knowing is what I consider as singularity.

        Yes, I too want to thank all the members of FQXI for providing us all free thinkers a wonderful platform to express our thoughts and discoveries and enjoy this journey of life.

        Love,

        Sridattadev.