Quantum information and Cosmology: The connections by Angel Garcés Doz

Dear Leo Vuyk, to your first question: it is possible

As for your second question: are you absolutely right.

I'm still studying, as it breaks the symmetry of the Higgs vacuum, for, as you well said, oscillate and give mass to the fermions.

I've made ​​some progress, which in summary, is the expose, for if your interest.

What is clear, that is for sure is that the sum of the spins, as I have argued in the essay, it should be considered only the spin 1/2, of the fermions. Since, at the moment focusing on the six leptons, the sum of the spins:

[math]6\cdot{\displaystyle \sum_{s=1/2}(s+1)s=(9/2)}

[/math]

Now, as you well said, the Higgs vacuum oscillation; corresponds, taking into account the electric charges, all (note the equivalences, very important), and the contribution due to Higgs boson:

[math]

10\cdot\bigl\{[\ln(mv(H)/m_{e})-{\displaystyle \sum_{s}(s+1)s}]/7\bigr\}=O_{1}

[/math]

[math]10\equiv|3(\frac{4}{3})|+|3(\frac{2}{3})|+|3(\frac{-1}{3})|+|3(\frac{1}{3})|+|1|+|-1|\equiv2{\displaystyle \sum_{s}s\equiv10d}

[/math]

Clearly, three, by the three colors QCD

[math]7=3(\frac{4}{3})+3(\frac{2}{3})+3(\frac{-1}{3})+3(\frac{1}{3})+1\equiv7d[/math]

1)

[math]6\cdot{\displaystyle \sum_{s=1/2}(s+1)s+O_{1}=(9/2)+O_{1}\simeq\ln(m_{\mu}/m_{e})}

[/math]

2)

[math]2\cdot6\cdot{\displaystyle \sum_{s=1/2}(s+1)s-O_{1}=2\cdot(9/2)-O_{1}\simeq\ln(m_{\tau}/m_{e})}

[/math]

The previous two equations must be met, these two oscillations Higgs vacuum, to preserve the symmetry of the sum of the spins, compared to the sum of the spines (module), the quarkcounting three color charges.

3)

[math]6\cdot{\displaystyle \sum_{s=1/2}(s+1)s+O_{1}+2\cdot6\cdot{\displaystyle \sum_{s=1/2}(s+1)s-O_{1}=3_{C}\cdot6}}\sum_{s=1/2}(s+1)s

Dear Leo Vuyk, to your first question: it is possible

As for your second question: are you absolutely right.

I'm still studying, as it breaks the symmetry of the Higgs vacuum, for, as you well said, oscillate and give mass to the fermions.

I've made ​​some progress, which in summary, is the expose, for if your interest.

What is clear, that is for sure is that the sum of the spins, as I have argued in the essay, it should be considered only the spin 1/2, of the fermions. Since, at the moment focusing on the six leptons, the sum of the spins:

[math]6\cdot{\displaystyle \sum_{s=1/2}(s+1)s=(9/2)}

[/math]

Now, as you well said, the Higgs vacuum oscillation; corresponds, taking into account the electric charges, all (note the equivalences, very important), and the contribution due to Higgs boson:

[math]

10\cdot\bigl\{[\ln(mv(H)/m_{e})-{\displaystyle \sum_{s}(s+1)s}]/7\bigr\}=O_{1}

[/math]

[math]10\equiv|3(\frac{4}{3})|+|3(\frac{2}{3})|+|3(\frac{-1}{3})|+|3(\frac{1}{3})|+|1|+|-1|\equiv2{\displaystyle \sum_{s}s\equiv10d}

[/math]

Clearly, three, by the three colors QCD

[math]7=3(\frac{4}{3})+3(\frac{2}{3})+3(\frac{-1}{3})+3(\frac{1}{3})+1\equiv7d[/math]

1)

[math]6\cdot{\displaystyle \sum_{s=1/2}(s+1)s+O_{1}=(9/2)+O_{1}\simeq\ln(m_{\mu}/m_{e})}

[/math]

2)

[math]2\cdot6\cdot{\displaystyle \sum_{s=1/2}(s+1)s-O_{1}=2\cdot(9/2)-O_{1}\simeq\ln(m_{\tau}/m_{e})}

[/math]

The previous two equations must be met, these two oscillations Higgs vacuum, to preserve the symmetry of the sum of the spins, compared to the sum of the spines (module), the quarkcounting three color charges.

3)

[math]6\cdot{\displaystyle \sum_{s=1/2}(s+1)s+O_{1}+2\cdot6\cdot{\displaystyle \sum_{s=1/2}(s+1)s-O_{1}=3_{C}\cdot6}}\sum_{s=1/2}(s+1)s

Sorry, no passing, to insert the remaining equations, sorry for the repeats.

I get to see so

[math]6\cdot{\displaystyle \sum_{s=1/2}(s+1)s+O_{1}+2\cdot6\cdot{\displaystyle \sum_{s=1/2}(s+1)s-O_{1}=3_{C}\cdot6}}\sum_{s=1/2}(s+1)s

There is no way to post all equations; attached pdf

Apologies to everyone, including administrators, by repetition.Attachment #1: archivo_nuevo1.pdf

EndAttachment #1: attach2.pdf

Sorry sir, eliminate we both seem to have bothered you.

What you say you are squiggles mathematical, that according to you, do not represent reality, are precisely those that allow you and I We'll use two computers, and we exchange conversation, via a network. This is because these squiggles mathematical despises it seems

Please check their knowledge of physics, because bosons, according to Bose-Einstein statistics, are indistinguishable, why can occupy the same quantum state.

And now, based on these mathematical squiggles, that as you do not represent reality, I propose a question:

Is the Riemann hypothesis, it is possible that this relates his demonstration, with electrical charge?

Here's a hint with these mathematical squiggles:

First Imaginary part of the first zero of the Riemann hypothesis:

s= 1/2 + 14.134725141734693i; Z1= 14.134725141734693

http://oeis.org/A058303

[math]\exp Z_{1}-(m_{h}/m_{e})(\ln^{-1}(\varphi)-1)=m_{pk}/\sqrt{\pm e^{2}/G_{N}}

[/math]

Gn = Newton Constant (S.I ) = 6.67428 *10^-11 , Mpk = Planck mass

e= electric charge ( S.I ) = 1.602176565 *10^-19 ; mh= Higgs boson mass

me = electron mass; (mh/me)=246924 ; Phi= golden number = (sqr(5)+1)/2

2)

[math]

\ln(m_{pk}/\sqrt{\pm e^{2}/G_{N}})+\ln^{-1}({\displaystyle \sum_{F_{n}/240}F_{n}^{2}}+(1+\Omega_{c})^{2})=14.1347251004\simeq Z_{1}[/math]

Omega(c) = dark matter density, 240= non zero roots group E8

Regards

Thank you very much, dear Hansen, I will watch the results indicated.

Do not worry, I do not quite understand many things

Regards

Excuse me, sir, but my great ignorance, I can tell you that commits serious mistakes resulting from their ignorance of quantum mechanics: First, "your perfect abstract unseen bosons"

Not my bosons, are bosons that exist and are observable: photons of light, for example, with which you can see, through the interaction of the cells of the retina of the eye, with these bosons that you call abstract.

Second error: existing and observable reality of bodies of matter, composed of a large number of quantum particles, it becomes a non-interlaced macrostate, which depends on a critical value, as a factor of the Planck mass.

Third mistake: what you call real is the result of the actual existence of quantum microstates, which interact. Any physicist knows this first-year university.

I see you have not answered my question, on the possible demonstration of the Riemann hypothesis, by quantum physics, and specifically in relation to the electric charge.

I'll give the last track, this way, to prove the Riemann hypothesis, by quantum mechanics.

For the rest: greetings

[math]\pm e/\sqrt{m_{0}^{2}\cdot G_{N}\cdot n}=1

[/math]

[math]{\displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}}\pm e/\sqrt{m_{0}^{2}\cdot G_{N}\cdot n}={\displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}}\frac{1}{n^{1/2}}

[/math]

Renormalization: The vacuum is neutral, the electric charge.

And this can only happen, if all non-trivial zeros, the Riemann zeta function; are values ​​of (1/2+it). t = real number

Fulfilled, moreover, that:

[math]{\displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}}\pm e/\sqrt{m_{0}^{2}\cdot G_{N}\cdot n}={\displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}}\frac{1}{n^{(1/2+it)}}=0

[/math]

Be, all the imaginary parts of (1/2 + it), that satisfies:

[math]

\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^{s}}=0\:;\: s=\frac{1}{2}+it[/math]

[math]\frac{m(VH)}{m_{e}}(1+{\displaystyle \sum_{q}}\sqrt{q^{2}})=O{\displaystyle [\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\exp(-Im(s))]^{-1}}[/math]

Where, m(VH) is the value, in mass, the Higgs vacuum, and ,me, is the mass of the electron

And, electric chargues:

[math]{\displaystyle \sum_{q}}\sqrt{q^{2}}=\sqrt{(4/3)^{2}+(2/3)^{2}+(-1/3)^{2}+(1/3)^{2}+1^{2}}=\sqrt{31/9}[/math]

Regards

Not know if you have read my essay. In the essay, I show, that must exist four solutions for positive total energy. And these solutions all involve energy and momentum components, imaginary. The existence of these unobservable states, virtual, giving the minimum value of Heisenberg uncertainty.

Similarly, this implies the wave-particle duality. This dual state, while not measured, explains the double path followed by an electron, for example, in the experiment of the slit.

[math]E^{2}=m^{2}c^{4}+p^{2}c^{2}= (imc^{2}+pc)(-imc^{2}+pc)=E_{1}^{2}

[/math]

[math]E^{2}=m^{2}c^{4}+p^{2}c^{2}= (imc^{2}-pc)(-imc^{2}-pc)=E_{2}^{2}

[/math]

[math]E^{2}=m^{2}c^{4}+p^{2}c^{2}= (mc^{2}+ipc)(mc^{2}-ipc)=E_{3}^{2}

[/math]

[math]E^{2}=m^{2}c^{4}+p^{2}c^{2}= (-mc^{2}+ipc)(-mc^{2}-ipc)=E_{4}^{2}

[/math]

[math]E_{T}=\sqrt{E_{1}^{2}+E_{2}^{2}+E_{3}^{2}+E_{4}^{2}}=2E

[/math]

[math]E_{T}=\sqrt{E_{1}^{2}+E_{2}^{2}+E_{3}^{2}+E_{4}^{2}}=2E\rightarrow min(2\triangle p\triangle x\geq\hbar)

[/math]

Note, as the solutions are paired Terms of positive-negative energy, and negative-positive momentum

fulfilled:

[math]\left(\begin{array}{cc}

imc^{2}-pc & -imc^{2}+pc\\

imc^{2}+pc & -imc^{2}-pc

\end{array}\right)=0[/math]

[math]\left(\begin{array}{cc}

mc^{2}+ipc\; & mc^{2}-ipc\\

-mc^{2}+ipc\; & mc^{2}-ipc

\end{array}\right)=0[/math]

An example, found experimentally, the quantum entanglement. This effect is where the key to quantum mechanics. It is recognized that the change in the particle interlaced, to measure her mate is independant of the distance and occurs instantly. But this last assertion is an assumption, not been demonstrated either experimentally or mathematically. On the contrary, if it is allowed that virtual particles exceed the speed of light, in their ephemeral existence. But what happens to a virtual graviton?

A virtual graviton, which has a typical energy of 1.5 x 10^-43 J

This implies, that his time of existence, according to the uncertainty principle, it would:

[math](\hbar/2)/1.5\cdot10^{-43}=351557484\, s[/math]

At this time, at least can travel a distance of: c351557484= 1.05 x 10^17 m

In other words, the perturbation produced in space-time, to perform the measurement on particle A, is transmitted, meaning through grid quantified spacetime, the particle B

After doing experiments with such long distances such as those between one satellite-laboratory and laboratory on earth could possibly measure the change delay.

Generally, the existence of mathematical singularities in physical theory; often tell us that the theory is incomplete. I am referring to a zero time in changing the particle B

But as nature exibe extraordinary behavior; must be demonstrated both theoretical, and experimentally.

Finally: an example of the existence of these dual virtual states, is the Casimir force. Force produced in the vacuum between two conducting plates

[math]\frac{F_{c}}{A}=\frac{\hbar c\pi^{2}}{240d^{4}}

[/math]

Regards

Dear, Wesley Wayne Hansen. In relation to the two papers that you you show me, I find them very interesting. I am aware of the last experiment was carried out between entangled states, for measuring the velocity of remote longline action, in the case of finite and greater than that of light, safe. The results give a lower limit of c1.38 x 10^4. The upper limit that I can make out, is 54446.7c

The big question, I like: that's the real big question, which you do in the second post, and intelligently.Do not worry about not having sophisticated mathematical knowledge, for it is more important and rigorous logical thinking, that is the one that leads to ask the questions that are important, the big questions, that the most advanced science can not answer. Look I'm going to expose a relationship, that from my point of view is amazing, it makes you think maybe, in relation to that big question that you have done, and how smart already. It is a relationship that, by chance is impossible to be casual, and less to the degree of accuracy. Notice. First the data: mass of Earth, electron mass, equatorial radius Earth, Planck mass and Newton's gravitational constant.

speed light in vacuum.

[math]M_{earth}(function\, of\: g=9.80665\: m/s^{2})[/math]

[math]

r_{E-earth}=6378137\, m[/math]

[math]m_{e}=9.10938291\cdot10^{-31}Kg

[/math]

Gn = 6.67428 x 10^-11

[math]m_{pk}=2.176437508\cdot10^{-8}Kg

[/math]

1)

[math]M_{earth}(g)=g\cdot(r_{E-earth})^{2}/G_{N}=5.97728\cdot10^{24}Kg

[/math]

And here comes the amazing!!!

[math](m_{pk}/M_{earth})^{2}\cdot8=m_{e}\cdot G_{N}/(c^{2}\cdot r_{E-earth})

[/math]

http://pdg.lbl.gov/2013/reviews/rpp2012-rev-phys-constants.pdf

http://pdg.lbl.gov/2013/reviews/rpp2012-rev-astrophysical-constants.pdf

The answer to your question: God created all things.Today the world, both the scientist, etc, this conceited of his knowledge. conceited of his intelligence, when actually know much less than you might think. The arrogance has clouded their intelligence.As psychoenergetical, I have to say, that yes, indeed I myself have had experiences that today's science can not explain. Specifically: premonitory dreams with details, things that have happened after. But all this as you well know, is ignored by official science, ridiculed, etc.

I do not care what I say now, can mean the stigma in this essay contest.This summer, quite possibly, in June there is a large-scale event that will lead to World War III.If you are interested in this little paper published in vixra, here I leave

http://vixra.org/abs/1202.0064

With best wishes