Hi Cristinel,

I like the illustration of the spiderweb for catching particles and spiderweb for catching waves. Rings very true. Also the use of the delayed choice experiment is always welcome. I was going to go down that route myself (no pun intended)!

Well done!

Antony

    Hi Kjetil,

    Thank you for the comments. You say "but we still need to find the logically consistent subset that matches our observations don't we?". Of course, this is true. I look forward to read your essay.

    Best regards,

    Cristi

    Hi Antony,

    Yes, I hoped that the spiderweb metaphor captures the measurement problem in very simple terms. I am glad you liked it, and thank you for the comment.

    Best regards,

    Cristi

    Dear Cristi,

    a very good essay with a great overview about Wheeler's ideas. I agree completely. Your global consistency principle reminds me on my topological condistions. So, our approaches should be related, see my essay.

    Your whole ideas have a strong touch of mathematical logic, like topos theory. In particular Axiom Zero looks like the usual contradictions used in the proof of Gödel's incompleteness theorem.

    More later after rereading your essay.

    Torsten

      Dear Torsten,

      Thank you reading and commenting. I just finished your excellent essay, on your program of obtaining physics from the exotic smooth structures and topology, which I find very much in the spirit of "it from bit". Congratulations!

      Cristi Stoica

      6 days later

      Dear Gordon,

      Thank you for sharing with me your writing about your axiom, and for the kind comments.

      Best wishes,

      Cristi Stoica

      Dear Cristi,

      This is a very well written essay and I had to go back to Wheeler 'law without law' writings to fully appreciate it. I also found 'We have clues, clues most of all in the writings of Bohr, but no answer'. At least I am confident in this view and I think that quantum contextuality is a concept close to Wheeler's view but may be not as radical as the 'law without law' dogma.

      What is your opinion? You may be interested in my own essay on this topic

      http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1789

      Michel

        Dear Michel,

        Sorry for the delay in answering, I am on vacation and I am able to check the messages and answer very rarely. I look forward to reading your essay, and I will return with a more detailed answer.

        Best regards,

        Cristi

        Dear Cristi

        Unfortunately, your essay is too large for self-service capabilities of my computer, but I agree with "axiom Zero ".

        http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1802

          Hi,

          Thank you for letting me know about the size of my file. Next week, when I'll be back home, I will try to upload a smaller file for you.

          Best regards,

          Cristi

          Dear Cristi,

          You offer another excellent essay food for inspiration. Because I am convinced that we follow - more or less - the same way seeing into Nature allow me to pose few suggestions as interpretation between our views.

          You propose the law of no law and the zero axiom. They are both right although could go a long way forward if they are combined.

          The low of no law is related to two independent factors. First the position and state of observer (e.g. variety of "constants" in relation to the Universe's age) and second the real or virtual reality the law is applied into. According to the latter differentiation, the law acts in exactly the opposite manner and not just alterably (e.g. impulsive or repulsive gravity). This is related to zero axiom in the sense that going to elementary level examination, the difference is expressed by opposition ( or -) in Nature. This differs from the notion of existence or not, that implies to 0 or 1 for a bit. No existence is the existence of two or more (2n) opposite existents, n of them in certain state and the rest n in the opposite one. This leads also to the unlimited division (of no existence...).

          Good luck,

          ioannis h., narsep

            Hi Christi,

            I really enjoyed reading your essay, it is one I printed out.

            "The Big Book of the Universe" remids me of "The library of Babel" by Jorge Luis Borges. You mention that this book contains "every" truth, but what with the not true ? There is a lot in our universe that we see as true but it may be untrue. That is why I created so called "Total Simultaneity", where every probable, unprobable, possible , impossible (for us) universe "IS", however I agree that I cannot describe this "environment" with words or formula's (because they are causal and TS is non-causal).

            In my essay : "THE QUEST FOR THE PRIMAL SEQUENCE" I try to go deeper in the ocean of "reality", but I feel like a grain of salt so I melt before I can reach any depth.(http://belurmath.org/gospel/chapter03.htm thank you Don Limuti). I hope dear Christi that you can spare some time to read and rate it.

            Congrats with the high score.

            Wilhelmus

              Hello, Christinel,

              I was interested, as many others, in your approach to Wheeler. I am on the other side, as you will see if you read my essay, but would like to question you on a couple of things, if I may: what is the basis for saying that the universe asks us only questions with yes-no answers? Many of the questions I get asked in life have much more complex answers. Also, regarding the Tao as a model of It-Bit: the discussion of the Tao often refers not only to yang and yin, but to their conjunction (or join). How do you take this into account?

              Best regards,

              Joseph Brenner

              P.S. My logic derives from that of Stéphane Lupasco. If this name means something to you, we have a further basis for discussion. JEB

                Forgot to mention that I liked axiom zero and also that you suggest the Universe is mathematical in nature, which sits well with my essay. I'd be delighted if you could find the time to look at my essay, which also relies on observation and attempts to link the Fibonacci sequence with reality around Black Holes by utilising information exchange.

                Kind regards,

                Antony

                Dear Cristinel,

                I have down loaded your essay and soon post my comments on it. Mean while, please, go through my essay and post your comments.

                Regards and good luck in the contest.

                Sreenath BN.

                http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1827

                  Dear Ioannis,

                  Thank you for reading and commenting. Sorry for answering with a delay, I am travelling, with no computer and Internet. You make interesting observations.

                  Best regards,

                  Cristi

                  Dear Ioannis, Wilhelmus, Joseph Brenner, Sreenath,

                  Thank you for reading and commenting. Sorry for answering with a delay, I am travelling, with no computer and Internet. You make interesting observations.I will reply soon.

                  Best regards,

                  Cristi