Dear Basudeba,
Thank you for your comment that my paper is interesting and thought provoking. That is my intent in providing the information that is contained in all of the papers that I have provided in this world. It is never provided just to try to fit into the current scientific mold to win a prize, etc., but is intended to provoke others to expand their thinking beyond current understandings to allow the attainment of the next level of advancement. When you say "We wish" are you speaking not only for yourself, but also on behalf of others that have read the paper with you or is that just a language translation artifact. If others are involved, putting the name of each one before his comments or questions would make it easier for me to respond to each one more in line with his own understandings. You are right that I don't always make minimal size paragraphs. I tend to get caught up in the best way to present the information to make understanding of it easier and often don't consider man's current general short attention span. See my above comment to Joe as to why I didn't provide more examples. Hopefully I can provide them to you now.
The internal structural information of even a sub-energy particle is more complex than can be expressed by one letter of the alphabet. It contains at least the current position of the particle, its three dimensional composite direction of travel, and its motion amplitude (the level, amount, or quantity of motion that it possesses.) It also contains all of the information needed to support all of the types of interactions that it can take part in. You could, of course, have this information stored elsewhere and refer to it using a letter of the alphabet as is often too common in mathematical presentations. You are right that the external relational information can take the form of something as small as an interaction between two matter particles or could be on a much larger scale such as the composite interactions of a very large number of particles when two cars crash into each other. I am aware of man's current belief that the universe started as a point singularity that in some way expanded and in so doing created the universe that we see today. Because of man's current limited knowledge and understanding of the motions that are present within the universe it is not possible to logically say much about that conclusion except to say it could be possible within the framework of man's current understanding and experimental abilities.
The concept of dimension can be used both to describe absolute spatial directions of the spatial system separate from all entities that exist in it and relative spatial directions generated between local entities that exist in that system. You are right that an energy photon could be used as a source to generate a local directional system between it and other entities, but since it travels at the speed of light it might not be the best choice to use to compare the relative directions and locations of matter particles at rest or traveling very slowly. When I talk about direction as internal structural information I am not talking about the direction that it appears to be traveling in, to an external observer. I am talking about the direction of travel information contained within the particle's internal structural information that allows it to continue to change from its current position to the next proper position to maintain its current path in a straight line in that current direction of travel in the absence of an interaction. This information must be stored in some way somewhere in order for the particle to continue to use it to move to its next proper position. When you talk about needing an extra dimension in mathematical space, are you talking about a time dimension? I would be very surprised if man has not yet developed a mathematical means of describing a zero dimensional (dimensionless) world that contains only one point without having to use dimensions that are not present in it to describe it. Math is an abstract information form. There should be no need to consider a position of a one dimensional line on a two dimensional paper which could not exist in a one dimensional world. I am assuming that you are referring to my mention of the fourth and fifth dimensions used to describe the structure of energy photons and matter particles. The reason that they have not been found is that observations have not been interpreted in a way that would make it obvious that the observations are of motions in those dimensions. It should be obvious to anyone today that all things are composed of motions. I say this because observations have shown that matter particles can be changed into energy photons and energy photons can be changed into simple motions. Man does not currently know about the existence of the sub-energy particle, but it is composed of a single motion traveling in some direction at a velocity generally less than the speed of light. It has an important role to play and is mainly observable to man at this time in the structure of fields. The energy photon contains two motions. First there is its motion in some direction at the speed of light. Its second motion is a motion in the fourth dimension that generates the photon's frequency, wavelength, and dynamic mass effects. The fourth dimension is very small. It is three times the size of the width of the structural point of the photon. At this point I believe that man considers that to be a dimensionless point, but it does actually have a physical size, albeit a very small one. The fourth dimensional motion of the photon travels back and forth between the ends of this dimension and bounces off of the ends and then travels back in the other direction in a continuous back and forth cycle. Our three dimensional structure intersects this fourth dimension at the center of this fourth dimension. When a photon's fourth dimensional motion is at an extreme end of the fourth dimension, it is just outside of our three dimensional structure and, therefore, has no effect if an interaction occurs at that point. The photon behaves as though it is a sub-energy particle with extremely low mass effect that is currently not detectable by man. As it begins to travel back toward the center of the fourth dimension, it begins to be partially within our three dimensional structure. Its mass effect begins to increase and reaches a maximum effect when its fourth dimensional motion is completely within our three dimensional structure. Its mass effect then decreases until it reaches zero again just as it reaches the other end of the fourth dimension. It then bounces off of the end of the dimension and travels back toward the center of the fourth dimension, but this time it is traveling in the opposite direction. This creates the same increase followed by decrease in mass effect as before, but in the opposite direction. The fourth dimension interfaces with our three dimensional structure at ninety degrees in a similar way to the way that the lower three dimensions interface with each other except that all points in the three dimensional structure only interface with the center of this fourth dimension. The net effect is a cyclical motion effect at ninety degrees to the direction of motion of the photon that generates a variable mass effect that varies from zero to a maximum level then back to zero then back to the maximum, but in the opposite direction then back to zero. This cycle repeats indefinitely as long as the photon exists. The speed of light is the induction point at which any greater velocity is transferred into the particle's fourth dimensional motion. The greater the fourth dimensional motion amplitude, the faster it travels through its complete motion cycle back and forth in the fourth dimension and its frequency is, therefore, increased. Because the photon's motion in its direction of travel is locked at the speed of light, the quicker the fourth dimensional motion completes a cycle the less the distance that the photon travels in its direction of travel during one complete cycle of the fourth dimensional motion, so the wave length of one cycle in its direction of travel is decreased. Like in the case of all motions, an increase in the fourth dimensional velocity increases its mass effect in an interaction and, therefore, its dynamic mass effect is increased. The photon's mass effect during an interaction is mostly due to the angular motion of the photon's fourth dimensional velocity. The in line motion at the speed of light adds very little mass effect to the interaction due to the structure of the interaction interface (how the interaction occurs). Instead of recognizing these effects as the result of the fourth dimensional motion they are generally attributed to be properties of a mysterious field the nature of which no one really understands. A similar situation exists concerning the role of the fifth dimensional motion in the production and functioning of matter particles, but if I give details on that too, you will definitely think this paragraph is too long. I am trying to use one paragraph to respond to each of your paragraphs to make it easier for you to track what each response is to.
Now I have a new paragraph, so I can give some information about basic matter particles like the electron and the fifth dimensional motion that is involved in its production. Since a photon can be changed into a matter particle and a matter particle can be changed into a photon, it is evident that they each contain all the basic constituents of the other. If the photon is composed of motions, it is, therefore, likely that a matter particle is also composed of motions. There are two big differences in the behavior of energy photons and matter particles. The first is that the photon travels at the speed of light while the matter particle can exist in a rest or stopped state. The second is that the energy particle only has a dynamic mass effect that increases with an increase in frequency while a matter particle has a much greater continuous mass effect that is present even when it is at rest and increases when it is in motion. To convert a photon to a matter particle its linear motion must be able to be stopped and it must be given rest mass. An extra fifth dimensional motion can do both. Again there is an induction point which if a photon's fourth dimensional velocity exceeds; some of its fourth dimensional motion can be transferred to its fifth dimensional motion component. In addition to this though, the motion transfer can only take place if the proper angular motion component is present. This means that a photon could possess adequate fourth dimensional motion to allow it to be changed into a matter particle, but if the required angular motion component is not present it will continue to be a photon. Also, if a matter particle loses its required angular motion component such as in an interaction with an antimatter particle (they have fifth dimensional motions that travel in the opposite directions, so their opposite angular components cancel out in an interaction between them) its fifth dimensional motion will be transferred back into the fourth dimension and it will convert back into a photon. Here is a beginning idea of how it works. The interface between the fifth dimension and the lower three dimensions is such that as a particle's fifth dimensional motion travels in the fifth dimension it induces motion into the lower three dimensions. It does not induce equal amounts simultaneously into all three dimensions, but it induces motion into each dimension in turn that increases as it approaches that dimension and then decreases eventually to zero as it passes that dimension. The effects overlap in such a way that when one dimension is experiencing its maximum effect, the other two experience zero effect when the fifth dimensional motion is completely engaged with the dimension experiencing maximum motion transfer. As the fifth dimensional motion begins to leave the first dimension it also begins to enter into range to induce motion into the second dimension, so motion transfer to that dimension starts and increases to the maximum level when the fifth dimensional motion is fully engaged with it. At the same time, motion transfer to the first dimension has been decreasing as the fifth dimensional motion travels toward the limits of the motion transfer range. Transfer reaches the zero level just as the maximum transfer level to the second dimension is reached. This pattern continues as the fifth dimensional motion travels from the second dimension to the third dimension and again to complete the cycle as it travels from the third dimension back to the first dimension. The net effect is to cause the photon to take a three dimensional curved path that encloses back upon itself to create a continuous cyclical motion path structure, which we know as a matter particle. That is about as much as I have so far given to anyone in this world, but you are the lucky one to receive the next bit (not binary) of information about it. The obvious apparent flaw is that all of the fifth dimensional motion would thus be expected to be drained into the lower three dimensions and then the matter particle would turn back into a photon. As this motion is added to the lower three dimensions it would tend to increase the photon's linear motion to be greater than the speed of light, but excess motion would be transferred from the lower three dimensions into the fourth dimension in an attempt to restore its linear motion to the speed of light. If the photon is of a proper wavelength to properly fit within the matter particle's enclosed motion path and that wavelength is properly phased within the matter particle it creates the proper angular motion component to allow the motion to be transferred back into the fifth dimension and the particle's continuous cyclical interdimensional motion transfer cycle is complete. If one or both of the above conditions is not met all of the fifth dimensional motion is first transferred to the lower three dimensions and then transferred into the fourth dimension and the matter particle changes back into a photon. This is part of the mechanism that determines what particles are stable and what ones aren't. That is about as much detail as I can give out at this time in this world. The reason that the electron's position can't be completely determined is that it is not a point dimensionless particle as it is usually considered. It is a dynamic continuous motion structure composed of a linear motion at the speed of light that is modified by its fifth dimensional motion into a three dimensional curved enclosed path and as it travels, this path is continuously changing in dynamic mass effect from zero to a maximum mass and then back to zero and then back to maximum dynamic mass in the opposite direction at ninety degrees to its continuously changing direction of motion within its enclosed path. You would need to figure out a few more things to completely understand why the various probabilities exist and what they are telling you about the structure of an electron, but I have given you enough to get you started. Of course, even if you get a complete understanding of these things it will still not allow you to find the position of a single electron because man has not yet attained the ability to work effectively on the size scale of individual matter particles such as the electron let alone on the scale of its internal motion components. It can be done, however, but man will need to figure out many details in order to be able to make the necessary fifth vector transfers to allow things to be worked on accurately at this size scale. The rest mass effect is mostly due to the angular motion component generated by the matter particle's fifth vector motion. The three dimensional aspect of this motion assures that the particle's mass effect is the same in any interaction regardless of the direction from which another particle approaches it.
An absolute structure is an entity that has the same structure throughout, in such a way that any interaction between it and another similar absolute structure always yields the same result. A point object would generally be an example of an absolute structure.
The book of pictures could include pictures from all necessary angles to give a complete view of all of the car's parts. You are right that you cannot read a book and fully understand it unless you know the abstract language it is written in and how to read and understand what you read in that language, etc. Not all words convey a concept that matches a physical object. As an example, a science fiction book may convey many concepts that have no matching physical objects in reality. The abstraction actually comes from using symbols such as letters and numbers, etc. to represent something else. In the case of actual physical objects, abstraction is replacing the actual object with something else that acts as a place holder in place of the actual physical object. Anything can be used as a replacement. Abstraction can have several layers of structure, so that several objects may be used to represent a single physical object. This is common in man's written languages. As an example, to represent a specific car you might write "George Fern's 2009 Toyota Camry" which takes about 30 symbols to represent the actual specific car object that is being referred to. These symbols are divided into five words or concepts that represent different aspects of that object adequate to allow someone to determine which actual object is being referred to. If the language contained a different single symbol for each possible physical object, there would be only a single level of abstraction. In the example above, though, there are only a few symbols used to represent all possible objects. An individual object is represented by a series of these symbols in the form of words with extra space between words used to separate one word from the next. This adds another layer of abstraction. Each layer of abstraction requires additional knowledge to know how to use it to determine the meaning that is being expressed by it. Each layer, therefore, adds more opportunities for errors to enter into the interpretation of the structure. It is true that if the abstraction does not compare accurately with the concept being represented by it, it can add more opportunities for errors in interpretation to enter in. As an example, if the mathematical space was closer to a direct image of the physical space many opportunities for error would be removed. Yes, a concept that is designed to represent an actual perception should be as close in detail of structure as possible to the perception in form.
I have studied man's concept of evolution and have come to the conclusion that it is for the most part a false philosophy. Virtual particles do not pop out and vanish again. Sub-energy particles are motion entities that possess a single motion that is for the most part less than the speed of light. They tend to be entrained and channeled by the cyclical motion structures of matter particles. This causes their density to be increased in the vicinity of such particles. Objects can increase this density in some circumstances, such as when they approach each other at great speed, etc. to the point that an interaction can take place between a matter particle, such as an electron and a sub-energy particle. This interaction can transfer enough motion to the sub-energy particle to increase its speed to greater than the speed of light. This extra motion is then induced into the fourth dimension and the sub-energy particle becomes an energy photon. If the amount of motion transferred is great enough and the proper angular motion component is also present the sub-energy particle can not only transfer motion into its fourth dimensional motion, it can also transfer some motion into its fifth dimensional motion and become a matter particle. Because man has not yet discovered the sub-energy particle, it appears that the photon or matter particle has just come into existence from empty space, but for those who know about sub-energy, it is just another example of a motion transfer system. The persistence of information transfer structures, such as speech is a whole other subject, but I will not go into that here because this comment is getting very long already. My point about the video games was that they start out as abstract computer code that is transferred into a literal environment of beings and other things on the video screen as a similarity to how the world starts out as abstract symbols of sub-energy, photon, and matter particles, which are built up in several layers of assembly into our environment of literal beings and other things in this world. You are right, though, that the programmer can choose whether to make his game model his reality or make it be different from our reality. The programmer is in this way the games god. He makes the laws and the beings within the game must obey the laws that he made in order to succeed in the game environment. This could be a likeness to the real world in that God made the laws of our world and we must obey them in order to succeed in this world.
Very well written. You hedged your bets in all the right places. The mirage comment is also pretty good. There are cases, however, in which an image of an actual place where there is water bounces off of layers of air at different temperatures in such a way that you are actually being given information about a direction in which water can be found. It may just be much farther than it appears to be. If you are ever in that situation look for other things also in the mirage image, such as palm trees, etc.
My position here is to transfer information to man that will prepare him for future needs. As a very important man once said, "I am not come to destroy men's lives, but that they might have life and that they might have it more abundantly." I do not mind criticism as long as it is intended for good to increase my knowledge and not for evil just to try to discredit the information that is being provided even if it is true in order to protect one's own pet or even currently established theory even if it is not true. I like constructive suggestions and seeking clarifications. That is how people work together in a way that can allow all involved to grow in knowledge and understanding. My position is to work with all to the degree that I can and they allow. I don't take offence to anyone who is seeking to understand the truth.
Peace be unto you,
Paul B.