EPR PARADOX SOLUTION SIMPLIFIED
Take two CD size discs, hold them face to face a little apart(a mate can do the same behind you). These can perhaps represent simple orbiting dipoles or monopoles.
In your right hand is Alice's detector B, in your left is an entangled particle P approaching the detector, spinning in opposite directions. Now tip the top of the 'detector' disc so it touches P. It doesn't actually matter where on the 'orbit', but your mate's detector B is changed to line up exactly parallel with A. The contact points are exactly opposite so you find 0% correlation. we'll call these 'up' and 'down', (but they could equally be 'left' and 'right').
You now tilt the opposite side forward, so it's 180 degrees different to Alice's, in which case it touches at exactly the SAME point, so you get 100% correlation.
Now if you bring the disc P more vertical and touch the 'detector' disc you'll find the 'touch point' less 'certain', until at vertical it touches 'all over', then tilt it the other way, progressively further from vertical, and it again becomes more certain.
If you did it 1,000 times you'd find at 'flat together' there would be a ~50:50 distribution of 'up and 'down'. This is true WHEREVER on the orbit you've selected the first touch point. (If the discs are coloured half and half red blending to green then just pick the greenest points of both as the start point).
Now you'll find that not only does this arrangement result in the Bell inequalities (the cosine curve distribution) when the two sets of results are 'correlated', but ALSO gives a cosine curve distribution independently at EACH detector! That means no spooky or FTL communication is required;
Consider; You change Bob's detector angle relative to Alice's, from 180 to 60 degrees. The uncertainty of touch point increases, and YOU have produced the cosine curve of unequal correlation between the two (up/down) results yourself with NO communication with Alice. Alice can do exactly the same without reference to you!! Malu's Law applies, converting a circle to a plane giving a cosine 'wave' distribution subject to angle. The 3D 'orbit' parameter is additional to Bells assumptions.
The only assumption is the conserved orientation of the entangled particles spin axis. It is not exactly a 'hidden variable' theory, but a large scale variable as Bell anticipated may prove the answer, substantially unifying SR and QM.
If FQXi was ever going to have a headline breakthrough this must surely be it!!
The links in the 1st post above contain the video and experimental evidence of the orbital angular momentum invoked.
Peter
