Dear Peter,

I hope you enjoyed the sweetness of the essay being short though, as it is called, short and sweet. Once we know our absolute self we can better architect the relative reality we consciously construct continuously. I am only trying to make us all wake up to the truth of our self or singularity.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Dear Sir,

The purpose of this contest is to analyze reality with special focus on information. In our essay published on May, 31, we had just done that. We are not discussing relativity unless the context so demands. Generally, we do not use relativity, but point out the fallacies in others presentations with alternative explanations.

Singularity is a derivative of relativity (unless you are referring to Adwait, which is total unification, which again is different from absolute equality). Hence you are talking about relativity.

Atman refers to the "Attaa" - one who enjoys. Brahman refers to "Brimhan", which refers to that which expands and the greatest of all. Aanandam refers to "Swaatantrya" - absolute freedom. They are three distinct aspects not in equilibrium. They do not belong to the same class. Since you are referring to three distinct, but different aspects, you are not talking about Adwait either.

The Vedas also declare "Ko dadarsha prathamam jaayamaanam, asthanwantam yad anasthaa bibhartim" - which refers to the primordial transformation from "Anna-annaada" to "rayi-praana" to "sthitisiddha-bhaatisiddha" objects that constitute the present Universe. This aspect of the Vedas is necessary for this forum. Mixing up issues gives our ancient heritage a bad name. In case you want

to discuss philosophy, you are free to do so, but please do not call it physics. This is a forum for physics.

Regards,

basudeba

Good, albeit short, read. Well done getting to the heart of the issue. While in my essay I emphasize bit and don't venture into the 3rd category of 'I' as you have, certainly some kind of 'thought' precedes action, but there is always the issue of matter/substance as a necessary carrier of Information/I, so can one element truly precede the other? Perhaps their identities are equally codependent (even 'I')?

    Dear John,

    You are absolutely right, the point that I am trying to make is that there is only one I, which loops back on to itself via the bits and its. Its a continuous process and hence no distinction can be made absolutely. Energy (bits or information) and matter (it) are just that relative medium that I uses to communicate with itself accross the space-time which came forth out of I. It's all just a game that I plays.

    Love,

    Sridattadev.

    dear basudeba,

    Who is physics (matter and energy) for if not for the I or the soul?

    Love,

    Sridattadev.

    I always judged by the high score for that belief.

    Dear basudeba,

    Keep asking that simple question who am i? You will find the answer to that with in your self.

    Love,

    Sridattadev.

    Dear Hai,

    Thank you and from your essay I know that you are a believer in the absolute as well and I wish you the absolute joy in your journey.

    To the question you posed at the end of your essay, Is God absolute?

    We have to first find God to confirm if God is absolute and the best place to find GOD is with in your self. You are the God that you are looking for, once you realize this truth, you will find that you are the absolute as well.

    So the answer is, I in all of us is the absolute GOD.

    Love

    Sridattadev.

    GOD - Generator (creator), Organizer (sustainer), Destroyer (dissolve or discard)

    Do we all not do these actions of creation, sustenance and destruction on a regular basis, so are'nt we all GOD?

    Love,

    Sridattadev.

    Dear Sir,

    You only said "Who is physics (matter and energy) for if not for the I or the soul?" Hence you should clarify what you mean by I and the soul. How can we know by asking that question to us? Other than you, only God, if there is any such thing, will know what you think. Hence please clarify your own statement. You must be knowing what you are saying. Since you say the answer is simple, please clarify.

    Regards,

    basudeba

    Dear Sridattadev,

    Thanks for presenting your essay and pleased to see you here. I have down loaded your essay and make comments on it after reading it. Meanwhile you too, please, go through my essay and send your comments.

    As usual, I wish you best of luck in the competition.

    Love,

    Sreenath.

      Dear Sreenath,

      I wish you all the best in sharing your perspective of the reality with the rest of us all.

      Love,

      Sridattadev.

      Dear Sir,

      It is no reply, because it is a self-contradictory statement. Even Veda says "Neti-neti", meaning it cannot be fully explained. Why don't you admit your ignorance and refrain from showing off your "vast knowledge"? It is bringing a bad name to our Shastras.

      Regards,

      basudeba

      Dear Sridattadev,

      I read your enchanting essay. In my essay, if the word 'mind' is replaced by 'Atman' in your essay then we are on the same plane travelling to reach our preordained destination, The Absolute or The 'Brahman'. And I know that you are yearning for that.

      warmest regards,

      sreenath.

      Dear basudeba,

      You are right, this absolute state can not be explained in words or theories. We as humans are gifted to enjoy this blissful absolute state if we so choose to. That is all trying to convey to the beings of my kind, that we are all capable of and enjoying the divinity or absolute equilibrium with in our self. Shastras or not for any particular ethnicity or religious group, they are a scientific theories from a different time. To think that you belong to a particular sect is to limit your consciousness, to know that we are all the same irrespective of religion, region, race, even though from different place and time is to expand your consciousness to the universal consciousness.

      We are all free to choose on how we want to perceive the world, and that is the absolute beauty of the conscience or will. I wish you all the best in what ever you are trying to convey to the scientific world. All I have to share is self realization.

      Love,

      Sridattadev.

      Dear Sreenath,

      Yes indeed and I want all of our kind to yearn for and enjoy this divine equilibrium or singularity with in the self.

      Love,

      Sridattadev.