Dear Sridattadev,

I have also found that 0 can display infinite characteristics. I agree that zero/singularity such as that we envisage at the start of time, is still mathematically conserved.

Good points and thanks for reading and commenting on my essay too,

Antony

Dear Antony,

I was playing with Fibonacci series this evening while sitting in my backyard and came across two other series of numbers. I will put down how I arrived at them.

I wrote the Fibonacci series on a paper up to 12th degree on either side of 0 as follows

-144 89 -55 34 -21 13 -8 5 -3 2 -1 1 0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144

I virtually folded the paper in my mind at 0 so that the numbers on either side overlapped and added them to each other where they aligned.

I got a new series

0 2 0 4 0 10 0 26 0 68 0 178 0 466 0 1220 0 3194

ignoring the 0's it read as 0 2 4 10 26 68 178 466 ....

Soon I realized that this can be defined by an equation

Sn = 2 * Sn-1 sigma (I=2 to n) Sn-i

with the seeds of

S0 = 0

S1 = 2

S2 = 2 * S1 S0 = 2 * 2 0 = 4

S3 = 2 * S2 S1 S0 = 2* 4 2 0 = 10

S4 = 2 * S3 S2 S1 S0 = 2 * 10 4 2 0 = 26

I also found that division of the two successive numbers soon converges on 2.618 which happens to be the square of golden ratio 1.618.

Now I went back to the original Fibonacci series and virtually folded it at 0 in my mind again and this time I subtracted the numbers where they aligned and I got another series as

0 2 0 6 0 16 0 42 0 110 0 288

Ignoring the 0's this read as 0 2 6 16 42 110 288 and I realized that this can be defined as an equation as well

Sn = 3 * Sn-1 - Sn-2

with S0 = 0 and S1 = 2 as the seeds

S2 = 3 * S1 - S0 = 3 * 2 - 0 = 6

S3 = 3 * S2 - S1 = 3 * 6 - 2 = 16

S4 = 3 * S3 - S2 = 3 * 16 - 6 = 42

S5 = 3 * S4 - S3 = 3 * 42 - 16 = 110

I also found that division of the two successive numbers in this series also soon converges on 2.618 which happens to be the square of golden ratio 1.618.

Finally I did another interesting thing, merged these two series and got another one which read as

First series --->0 2 0 4 0 10 0 26 0 68 0 178 0 466

Second Series ---> 0 2 0 6 0 16 0 42 0 110 0 288 0

Merged series -->0 2 2 4 6 10 16 26 42 68 110 178 288 466

I realized that the merged series is a new Fibonacci type series with a different second seed of 2 instead of 1. Even this series successive number division yields the golden ratio of 1.618.

Now I asked my self if we can have 2 as a second seed and produce another series which yields the same golden ratio why not 3 and soon found that

0 3 3 6 9 15 24 39 63 102 .... is also a series that also converges on the golden ratio 1.618.

0 4 4 8 12 20 32 52 84 136...... is also a series that also converges on the golden ratio 1.618

So any Fibonacci type series with 0 as the first seed and I ( from 1 to infinity) as the second seed will have the successive numbers ration in them converging on the golden ratio of 1.618. This again proves the point that I, the singularity, is equally the same everywhere. Mathematics is pointing to the absoluteness of I in Fibonacci too.

Love,

Sridattadev.

0 2 2 4 6 10 16 26

Dear All,

I give you all a cosmological iSeries which spans the entire numerical spectrum from -infinity through 0 to +infinity and the simple principle underlying it is sum of any two consecutive numbers is the next number in the series. 0 is the base seed and i can be any seed between 0 and infinity.

iSeries always yields two sub semi series, each of which has 0 as a base seed and 2i as the first seed.

One of the sub series is always defined by the equation

Sn = 2 * Sn-1 + Sigma (i=2 to n) Sn-i

where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2 * i

the second sub series is always defined by the equation

Sn = 3 * Sn-1 -Sn-2

where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2 * i

Division of consecutive numbers in each of these subseries always eventually converges on 2.168 which is the Square of 1.618.

Union of these series always yields another series which is just a new iSeries of a 2i first seed and can be defined by the universal equation

Sn = Sn-1 + Sn-2

where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2*i

Division of consecutive numbers in the merged series always eventually converges on 1.618 which happens to be the golden ratio "Phi".

Fibonacci series is just a subset of the iSeries where the first seed or S1 =1.

Examples

starting iSeries governed by Sn = Sn-1 + Sn-2

where i = 0.5, S0 = 0 and S1 = 0.5

-27.5 17 -10.5 6.5 -4 2.5 -1.5 1 -.5 .5 0 .5 .5 1 1.5 2.5 4 6.5 10.5 17 27.5

Sub series governed by Sn = 2 * Sn-1 + Sigma (i=2 to n) Sn-i

where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2i = 1

0 1 2 5 13 34 ...

Sub series governed by Sn = 3 * Sn-1 - Sn-2

where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2i = 1

0 1 3 8 21 55 ...

Merged series governed by Sn = Sn-1 + Sn-2 where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2i = 1

0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 ...... (Fibonacci series is a subset of iSeries)

The above equations hold true for any value of i, again confirming the singularity of i.

Love,

Sridattadev.

    There was a typo in the above, the ratio of the sub series always converges on 2.618 which is square of 1.618.

    Love,

    Sridattadev.

    Hello Sridattadev,

    Very good display of how these numbers can be used and appear throughout nature! I like that they work from zero towards infinity, this seems to hint at a natural system that works at the small and large scale, perhaps even one day explaining the differences between Quantum Mechanics and general Relativity. I think a Quantum Gravity theory could come out of it!

    Nice work!

    Antony

    Dear Antony,

    Thank you for your kind support, hope these findings will help humanity as you have said to understand ourselves and the universe we live in.

    Love,

    Sridattadev.

    Dear All,

    As per Antony's suggestion, I searched google to see how Fibonacci type series can be used to explain Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity and found an interesting article.

    http://msel-naschie.com/pdf/The-Fibonacci-code-behind-super.pdf

    Now that I split the Fibonacci series in to two semi series, seems like each of the sub semi series corresponds to QM and GR and together they explain the Quantum Gravity. Seems like this duality is a commonality in nature once relativity takes effect or a series is kicked off. I can draw and analogy and say that this dual series with in the "iSeries" is like the double helix of our DNA. The only commonality between the two series is at the base seed 0 and first seed 1, which are the bits in our binary system.

    I have put forth the absolute truth in the Theory of everything that universe is an "iSphere" and we humans are capable of perceiving the 4 dimensional 3Sphere aspect of the universe and described it with an equation of S=BM^2.

    I have also conveyed the absolute mathematical truth of zero = I = infinity and proved the same using the newly found "iSeries" which is a super set of Fibonacci series.

    All this started with a simple question, who am I?

    I am drawn out of my self or singularity or i in to existence.

    I super positioned my self or I to be me.

    I am human and I is GOD.

    Love,

    Sridattadev.

    Dear sridattadev,

    Glad to see your posting in my thread. Your work on Fibonacci series is enlightening to those who work on QG. In my previous essay contest in fqxi (2012) in my article on QG, you will find reference to Fibonacci series.

    Thanks for reminding me that and also for your innovative revelation on that.

    Looking forward to here more from you in future.

    Best regards,

    Sreenath

      Dear Sir,

      We have refuted your equating zero with infinity in our first post. We avoided replying to that telling that you do not want to discuss relativity. Then why are you continuing with such weird ideas?

      In your Author bio-data, you have said "I am your alter ego. We are one and the same i or the singularity or the conscience or the soul or the absolute or the god." I is discrete (consciousness is not) and alter ego suggests duality. Then how can both be same?

      What is the rationale of your writing or post to the topic at hand? It is beyond us! You are advocating 'pravritti' path, which only tempts the sense organs to go more for it (material enjoyment) and away from salvation. Of course it is your choice.

      Regards,

      basudeba

      Resp Sridattadev

      Thank you for the SAMA TATVA vishleshana..

      It is a real good philosophical thought...

      I believe in God, No problem. God is not space time. God is not any mathematical singularity undefined.

      About a chair or table or any thing we form a picture in our mind. This picture is information in our mind. It will die with the person at his death. We communicate this picture with each other. We can not just create matter from this information itself.

      Please discuss with me further...

      Best

      =snp

      snp.gupta@gmail.com

      Dear Sridattadev,

      Enjoyed your essay.

      It is easy the swap the real and the unreal :)

      Good to be reminded about the real.

      Yours in divinity,

      Don L.

        I always enjoy reading your essays, Sridattadev.

        While it is not strictly speaking about Physics, and while you do stretch the concepts somewhat, I find a lot to agree with in your work. I'd like to point out that, in the way you frame things "It from Bit" is a lot like "I think therefore I am!" Working from the Latin "Cogito Ergo Sum" can also be translated "Thinking therefore Being," which makes it much the same as "It from Bit."

        I find wonderment in the knowledge that I IS. Most people never get to that realization, as it requires the awareness of Spirit. I actually talk a little on this in my essay this year.

        My observation is that one can speak of three stages in the awareness of I.

        I Am - is the personal experience of existence

        I Is - acknowledges the presence of Spirit, as an agent of manifestation or change.

        I Be - refers to the nature of identity being found in the Divine itself.

        All the Best,

        Jonathan

          Of course;

          As I forgot to say.

          I Is implies the existence of a quality of identity that is pervasive.

          Have Fun!

          Jonathan

          Dear All,

          I am attaching the iSeries that I have envisioned and how it shows the DNA structure in its sequence.

          Its interesting to see the singularity is in the base seed of zero and how it is all pervasive all through out the structure. I have been telling that I is that nothing which dwells in everything and this DNA structure seems to prove that notion. Singularity is right with in the duality. Absolute is right with in the relativity. This proves that both of these states are interconnected and are the source of life.

          Love,

          Sridattadev.Attachment #1: iDNASeries.bmp

          Dear Satya,

          Information is also a form of energy. We as human sentient beings might be incapable of harnessing that energy and manifesting it into material reality at will, but that does not mean it cannot be done. Nature does this seamlessly using the information coded in the DNA and converting energy from the sun in to matter through photosynthesis. That is why I put plants at a higher conscious less than the average human being, for being conscious of knowing how to convert energy (information) to matter. GOD is Generator Organizer Destroyer of all that there is.

          Love,

          Sridattadev.

          Dear Sridattadev,

          It is again a pleasure to meet you again in this contest.

          You are the only one (beside myself) that is proposing the role of consciousness in the creation of reality.(my "Crealities")

          I wonder what you think of my participation "THE QUEST FOR THE PRIMAL SEQUENCE".

          In my perception DNA is one way of knowledge sharing in the infinities of the Eternal Now.

          I rated your "thoughts" high and hope that if you meet "alter ego" thoughts you will comment and rate mine also.

          respectfully

          Wilhelmus