Kai,
Your essay contains an original thought and I have rated it accordingly.
On page 4 you wrote: "time is a form of energy". That is new to me, I have never heard that before. There are several known substantival approaches to space, but time is usually not viewed as a substance.
Other points in your theory are problematic. Here are some issues:
1) On page 2 you write that "...all forces have fused to primal energy". But 'force' and 'energy' are different concepts. The unit of force is the Newton, in SI units you get [N] = [kg.m.s-2]. The unit of energy is the Joule, and in SI units you get [J] = [kg.m2.s-2]. You have to elaborate on how you get from Newtons to Joules during the fusion process.
2) From your first formula and you third formula it follows that gravity = mass. Now suppose we take two objects of 1 kg; we then let one of them drop 100 meters above the surface of the earth, the other 100 meters above the surface of the moon. Your theory then says that in both cases gravity is the same (namely, 1 kg), while other theories of gravity (Newton's, Einstein's) say that gravity is not the same in these cases. Could you comment on that?
3) The SI unit of mass is kg. From your third formula, we get [kg] = [m3.s-1]. I find that hard to believe. Can you elaborate?
Best regards,
Marcoen