Essay Abstract

In this essay the thought process which made us consider the fact 'Space contains Energy' as starting formulation of Unary law of Pico-Physics is described. An overview is provided on process of integrating the laws from contemporary physics into PicoPhysics. An overview is provided on integration of Geometrical properties of space into Unary Law. In Picophysics we find answers to questions never asked before. To this end; an overview is provided of integrating geometrical properties of space into unary law. Universe can be considered as a reality with two possible states as per Unary law (Space, & Space containing Knergy). The scope of PicoPhysics encompases understanding facts of nature whether identified in contemporary science or embedded in human psychology

Author Bio

Academically Vijay Gupta is an electronics engineer. He lives in Toronto, Canada. Theoretical Physics has been his passion since 1965. He initiated himself into a Pico-Physics - rethink process to integrate laws of physics into Unary law. Explanation begins with creation of particles in Space. The properties of these particles are evolved and identify with individual matter particles. Simple facts like 3-Dimensions of space, Time, Inertia, Force, Mass, Charge etc have to be integrated into Unary Law. Results of PicoPhysics match most of contemporary physics. It differs on elementary particles and theory of universe. www.picophysics.org

Download Essay PDF File

Dear Vijay mohan ji

Thank you for presenting your nice essay. I saw the abstract and will post my comments soon.

I am requesting you to go through my essay also. And I take this opportunity to say, to come to reality and base your arguments on experimental results.

I failed mainly because I worked against the main stream. The main stream community people want magic from science instead of realty especially in the subject of cosmology. We all know well that cosmology is a subject where speculations rule.

Hope to get your comments even directly to my mail ID also. . . .

Best

=snp

snp.gupta@gmail.com

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/

Pdf download:

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/essay-download/1607/__details/Gupta_Vak_FQXi_TABLE_REF_Fi.pdf

Part of abstract:

- -Material objects are more fundamental- - is being proposed in this paper; It is well known that there is no mental experiment, which produced material. . . Similarly creation of matter from empty space as required in Steady State theory or in Bigbang is another such problem in the Cosmological counterpart. . . . In this paper we will see about CMB, how it is generated from stars and Galaxies around us. And here we show that NO Microwave background radiation was detected till now after excluding radiation from Stars and Galaxies. . . .

Some complements from FQXi community. . . . .

A

Anton Lorenz Vrba wrote on May. 4, 2013 @ 13:43 GMT

....... I do love your last two sentences - that is why I am coming back.

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on May. 6, 2013 @ 09:24 GMT

. . . . We should use our minds to down to earth realistic thinking. There is no point in wasting our brains in total imagination which are never realities. It is something like showing, mixing of cartoon characters with normal people in movies or people entering into Game-space in virtual reality games or Firing antimatter into a black hole!!!. It is sheer a madness of such concepts going on in many fields like science, mathematics, computer IT etc. . . .

B.

Francis V wrote on May. 11, 2013 @ 02:05 GMT

Well-presented argument about the absence of any explosion for a relic frequency to occur and the detail on collection of temperature data......

C

Robert Bennett wrote on May. 14, 2013 @ 18:26 GMT

"Material objects are more fundamental"..... in other words "IT from Bit" is true.

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on May. 14, 2013 @ 22:53 GMT

1. It is well known that there is no mental experiment, which produced material.

2. John Wheeler did not produce material from information.

3. Information describes material properties. But a mere description of material properties does not produce material.

4. There are Gods, Wizards, and Magicians, allegedly produced material from nowhere. But will that be a scientific experiment?

D

Hoang cao Hai wrote on Jun. 16, 2013 @ 16:22 GMT

It from bit - where are bit come from?

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Jun. 17, 2013 @ 06:10 GMT

....And your question is like asking, -- which is first? Egg or Hen?-- in other words Matter is first or Information is first? Is that so? In reality there is no way that Matter comes from information.

Matter is another form of Energy. Matter cannot be created from nothing. Any type of vacuum cannot produce matter. Matter is another form of energy. Energy is having many forms: Mechanical, Electrical, Heat, Magnetic and so on..

E

Antony Ryan wrote on Jun. 23, 2013 @ 22:08 GMT

.....Either way your abstract argument based empirical evidence is strong given that "a mere description of material properties does not produce material". While of course materials do give information.

I think you deserve a place in the final based on this alone. Concise - simple - but undeniable.

    Dear Vijay,

    Thank you for your kind reamrks on my essay "THE QUEST FOR THE ¨RIMAL SEQUENCE"

    I have read with much interest your contribution to this contest.

    It seems that my "term" CREALITY is applquable to your perceprtion of reality, in fact everyone is "creating" his own reality and is making an effort to explain his awareness.

    In order to plunge deeper we must try to forget the so called "laws" that seem not to be laws at all, humanity is only existing one second and may be we will continue for hours .... so I am convinced that the perceptions we have now of our reality are very very flaw, we are in a mist observing vague forms and guessing what is the origin of them (Plato , the cave).

    It is good to see here in the FQXi contest all the efforts that are made by all these thinkers on our little globe, the total (including yours and mine) are only parts of a puzzle , but a lot of pieces are still in the box and the whole image is still invisible.

    Wilhelmus

      Thanks Mr Satyavarapu,

      Your statement 'there is no mental experiment, which produced material' reflects the eternal character of matter. This is founding basis of picophysics and termed Konservation.

      Now as far as CMB (Cosmic Microwave Background) is concerned, Picophysics has an interpretation of this reality which results (is derived) from Unary Law. As per this view, CMR are cooled photons (Quantized Electromagnetic radiations. The cooling takes place as they travel through space and loose energy. (Law of conservation of energy is valid a caveat in Picophysics).

      Thanks for your comments look forward to your support and working with you to further develop PicoPhysics.

      Vijay Gupta

      905 771 0024

      Dear Mr Hoang Cao Hai,

      PicoPhysics consider reality as reflected in laws of contemporary physics that needs to be understood through a common thought process.

      Absolute is the term understood in context of relativity that negates the notion of absolute motion. The emphasis and name incorporating relativity is misnomer in view of PicoPhysics for the observed reality explained by relativity. PicoPhysicist considers the Einstein contribution to describe motion as law of nature is more significant.

      Thanks for your comments look forward to your support and working with you to further develop PicoPhysics.

      Vijay Gupta

      905 771 0024

      Dear Mr Wilhelmus de Wilde,

      It is pleasure receive your comments on laws of physics. Picophysics consider the laws of physics as the reality that needs to be understood, integrated into a common thought process. This thought process is based on single law - Unary law besides concepts integrated into the three words constituting the law namely 'Contain'; 'Space' and 'Konservation'.

      Look forward to receiving your evaluation and comments on essay 'Formulation of Unary law'. I hope for your support and working with you to further develop PicoPhysics.

      Vijay Gupta

      905 771 0024

      Dear Mr Wilhelmus de Wilde,

      I read your article. It is well written and express a view point aligned with the subject matter of this competition.

      In PicoPhysics, we lack mathematics. It is being developed under the name of 'Infinite Mathematics'. This is being developed in synch with Picophysics. Currently it forms basis of understanding analog/digital world and its relationship with Konservation. This is the basis of viewing all material objects to be composed of single elementary particle type with simple particle like photon being composed of two unary particles.

      Look forward to receiving your evaluation and comments on essay 'Formulation of Unary law'. I hope for your support and working with you to further develop PicoPhysics.

      Vijay Gupta

      905 771 0024

      Proponent Unary Law (Space Conatins Knergy)

      Dear HoangCao,

      Can you expand on "TOE". I did not find this reference in your essay. In the discussions in the Blog, I find reference to questions like 'What is Information'.

      Generally speaking, in Picophysics we are concerned with observation. What is observation? Observation creates the information that is communicated.

      I have a small write-up on observation , which may be useful to divulge deeper into generation of information through observation.

      Look forward to receiving your evaluation and comments on essay 'Formulation of Unary law'. I hope for your support and working with you to further develop PicoPhysics.

      Vijay Gupta

      905 771 0024

      Proponent Unary Law (Space Contains Knergy)

      NB.

      Mr Satyavarapu

      There has been some confusion in picophysics on whether Unary particle replies to Photon of contemporary physics or neutrino. The current logic favors it to be neutrino. Hence Photon is composed of two Unary particles and so is electron as well as positron. Now anihilation to produce two photons as well as statistical nature of nuclear radiations is well explained.

      Thanks; look forward to your support and working with you to further develop PicoPhysics.

      Vijay Gupta

      905 771 0024

      Hello Vijay,

      Does Picophysics conclude Bit from It or vice versa? I like the description you mention where the Universe can be considered as a reality with two possible states...

      If you get chance, I'd very much appreciate your thoughts on my essay.

      Best wishes in the contest,

      Antony

      Thanks Ryan for asking,

      "Bit from It and It from Bit" is a topic like the Question "Egg and Hen which came first?" The (IT) information is expression of result of observation which then is based on objects about which knowledge about object, BIT (Nature) is extracted. Thus we get knowledge about different aspects of nature (BIT) from information (IT) communicated as result of observation .

      The second aspect of topic is current and related to purported discovery of Bosons and GOD particles - existence of which, we wish to conclude from information (statistical variation of certain collected data in experiments targeted to discover Bosons). Here contemporary scientific community wants to crown the discovery of GOD particles from analysis of noise like variation in electronic signal as information item.

      In a sense, when we take the first approach, information is projection of reality on observer. This information, as interjected, is documented in various laws of physics which are universally applicable. The essay processes this information in attempt to arrive at a single universally applicable law (The reduced Information set - Unary Law).

      We can therefore say Unary law represents the BIT (Reality) and Laws of Physics represent the IT (Information).

      Thanks for your question look forward to your support and working with you to further develop PicoPhysics.

      Vijay Gupta

      905 771 0024

      Proponent Unary Law (Space Contains Knergy)

        Dear Vijay

        Thank you for introducing about Picophysics. Your arguments are provoking any one into creation of particle is a reality. It is very interesting. Hope you don't mind my asking.....

        1. Did you or any one conduct any experiment where creation on any flavour of neutrino or any other particle was created from nothing?

        2. Was there any experiment which detect CMBR from Bigbang or by cooling of photons?

        Best

        =snp

        Dear Mr Satyavarapu Ji,

        Thanks for asking the question. Pico Physics integrates current laws of physics into a single law - Unary Law. This essay provides one aspect of formulation of unary law, as others in contemporary science are found deficient in some respect to fill the role.

        CMBR from Big Bang is a hypothesis. It is another matter that contemporary physicts tend to agree with the proposition.

        Cooling of photons into CMBR can not be a experiment in the sense it can only be concluded as interpretation of observation of cosmological events. We have already started seeing the Big Bang being challenged by new observation into oscillating universe etc. These observations where hobble's constant seem to change or recession of distant stars/galaxies decreasing/increasing can be qualitatively explained though a single thought process originating from Unary law.

        Creation of matter: No. We don't want to conduct these experiments. Experiments will necessary be in dismantling the confinement of Knergy in space (Nucleus) that can be dangerous. So before conducting experiments we need to have an understanding to control the result of experimentation.

        Look forward to receiving your evaluation and comments on essay 'Formulation of Unary law'. I hope for your support and working with you to further develop PicoPhysics.

        Vijay Gupta

        905 771 0024

        Proponent Unary Law (Space Contains Knergy)

        Vijay,

        Interesting essay. I have one question, does the Unary law ensure the cosmological constant always has a positive value?

          Vijay,

          If given the time and the wits to evaluate over 120 more entries, I have a month to try. My seemingly whimsical title, "It's good to be the king," is serious about our subject.

          Jim

            Thanks Harlan Swyers,

            In cosmology, some identify the cosmological constant as equivalent to an energy density in otherwise empty space. Since PicoPhysics identifies contemporary energy as rate of consumption of space, It is +ive where Matter is present. In empty space (devoid of matter) it is slightly negative. The balance is achieved when space consumed by matter equals the generated space.

            It can be seen, depending on distribution of matter between source and receiver the shift in spectrum of received radiation can vary. This result in general observation identified with Hubble's Law, as well as accelerating and pulsing universe. Geometrically universe is seen in equilibrium in PicoPhysics with other possibility (Accelerating/pulsing) being temporal in nature.

            Vijay

            Proponent Unary Law - Space contains Knergy

            I read your essay that deals with 'Quantum information theory'. PicoPhysics is a deterministic theory. Instead of probability, it talks in terms of possibility.

            Thanks for your comemnts.

            Vijay Gupta

            Proponent Unary Law - Space contains Knergy

            6 days later

            Hello Vijay,

            Thanks for the answer. Observation and chicken and egg are key points I reached in my conclusion also. Great example with Higg's as well. I would look forward to working with you too!

            Best wishes for the contest,

            Antony

            Dear Vijay Gupta ,

            I have down loaded your essay and soon post my comments on it. Meanwhile, please, go through my essay and post your comments.

            Regards and good luck in the contest,

            Sreenath BN.

            http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1827

            Hello Vijay,

            PicoPhysics theory look interesting, especially since you try to incorporate geometrical properties of space into Unary Law. I agree with the way you discuss 3-D Space, but what can cause the Heterogeneity of Space? Also, do you have proof of Pythagoras' Theorem not based on geometrical properties? You can have a look at my essay which also discusses geometry.

            Good luck in the contest.

            Best regards,

            Akinbo