Dear Vijay Gupta,

I enjoyed reading your essay. Contests FQXi - is primarily a contest of ideas. Excellent promising idea «Unary Law». The whole history of physics - it is a continuous process of unification. You and I are very close in spirit and direction of research. Excellent rating. See my essay.

I wish you every success and respect,

Vladimir

    Hello Akinbo,

    The heterogeneity of space is defined by unary law itself. "Space Contains Knergy" defines existence of Knergy in space as some isolated regions containing Knergy while others don't. This is the primary cause of heterogeneity of space.

    Yes, I have a proof of Pythagoras' Theorem not based on geometrical properties. In Pico physics all properties of space are derived from unary law. The tool to begin thinking as a PicoPhysist is infinite maths and k-diagram to understand heterogeneity of space.

    My article on 5-D univers contains the beginning and important elements of Infinite Maths.

    Thanks for comments. I participate in this forum for audience since I donot neither have means or life span to write article for science journals.

    Vijay Gupta

    Proponent Unary Law "Space Conatins Knergy"

    Hello Akinbo,

    The heterogeneity of space is defined by unary law itself. "Space Contains Knergy" defines existence of Knergy in space as some isolated regions containing Knergy while others don't. This is the primary cause of heterogeneity of space.

    Yes, I have a proof of Pythagoras' Theorem not based on geometrical properties. In Pico physics all properties of space are derived from unary law. The tool to begin thinking as a PicoPhysist is infinite maths and k-diagram to understand heterogeneity of space.

    My article on 5-D universe ; fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1326 contains the beginning and important elements of Infinite Maths.

    Vijay Gupta

    Proponent Unary Law "Space Conatins Knergy"

    Thanks Vladimir.

    This forum gives us (who are short on time) to get an audience for expressing the way we have understood the nature around us.

    We have discovered the difference between data, information, knowledge and understanding. While I got my knowledge by education and learning, understanding is more internal and comes out of hypothesis and logic one constructs for himself. PicoPhysics is one such construct to convert "knowledge about" to "understanding of" nature.

    Thanks again for your very encouraging comments.

    Vijay Gupta

    Prpoponent Unary Law 'Space Contains Knergy'.

    I read and commented on your essay. In my comments on this excellent essay I have suggested a look at my essay at 5-D universe . I will advice a look at my comments in discussions as well. An example is below:

    Dear Mr Steve Dufourny,

    It is my pleasure to read your comments. Many mainstream physics experts will feel the same. Text of your comments hints to some basic questions. I will try my best to formulate and reply to them.

    Before I address the questions, the 5-Dimensional universe to me is same as simple fact that Energy exists in Space. We can not intuitively conceive of energy existing without space. To this fact we add following observations taking them as facts;

    a. There is no observation of negative energy objects. Negative energy is conceived as a difference between two positive values (differential potential energy). So for energy, there is no negative as it exists for charge. When we apply conservation to energy, it is different than the conservation as applied to charge. To distinguish the two, we encapsulated conservation of energy as Konservation - Conservation without neutralization.

    b. The next subject of analysis used in this analysis, is what we mean by observation. Is it different than measurement. Can we measure something that does not exist? The intuitive answer is, we can not measure something which does not exist. This is used to create subset from number set, as physical number set for use in measurement.

    c. When we talk of dimesions, there is a reality in front of which we express the dimensions. For example dimension of area is 2 and volume is 3. When we are considering universe ( composed of energy existing in space), we are expressing dimensions of not only space but also include the dimensions of Energy.

    d. When we consider area of two dimensions, we multiply value of each dimension. However, for energy we don't do the same. The reason I believe is because, we are not able to distinguish different infinities. But with new infinite series, we can distinguish between infinities. So we can treat Energy as normal two dimensional reality, and space three dimension identity.

    This gives us 5-dimensions of the universe.

    1. Respect General and Special Relativity; you are very correct. We must respect these theories. The attempt here is to understand these theories as result of something more fundamental. For example consider special relativity; Consider can you measure time and distance independently. You can consider any permutation and combination, but will end up the distance measurement is based on time or vice versa. One can argue that we can have independent unit for length and time and measure them independently. But this is a false argument. The basic unit of length at the core is arrived using speed of light and time. Thus dependency of time and distance is inherent law of nature. In my view this sits at core of observations such as Lorentz transformations and The Michelson-Morley experiment. This is expressed as mapping of chronological dimension onto one of three space dimensions.

    2. General Relativity: Here again you are right. General relativity is seen by mainstream physics more as a set of mathematical tools to explain gravitation. However, in 5-dimensional model we give it a direct intuitive meaning consistent with observations. This is consistence not only with Newton's gravity but also with Cosmological expansion and cosmic background radiations. It may not clear at this point, but you will defiantly find that there is no contradiction between 5-dimensional universe and general relativity.

    3. Without 3-D: You are right here also. Though I don't understand full context of your statement, but I can say, the unary law 'Space contains Knergy' itself is at the foundation for space to have 3-dimensions. It is not disputed. But when we study, or evaluate results of an experiment or observation, we always encounter both space and energy, and hence 5-dimensional universe is relevant to us all the time rather.

    4. Complexity and singularities in 3-D space; Here again I agree with you. You will find the same further explanation on model of universe at http://picophysics.org/applications/model-of-universe/. I am working at putting something across on this, but need to cover simpler issues before coming to formation of elementary particles where these singularities will be explained.

    Thanks for your valuable comments.

    Vijay Gupta

    Proponent Unary Law - Space Contains Knergy

    6 days later

    Vijay,

    I find your essay very well written and insightful. I particularly found that we share the same deterministic mindset when you expressed, "...Space contains Energy. It was universally applicable, close to human perception and intuitively conclusive & deterministic."

    I wish to rate your essay highly but would like to run a question or two by you if I may via email before I do. What is your email address or if you prefer you can send an email response to my email address at: msm@physicsofdestiny.com

    I look forward to hearing from you.

    Regards,

    Manuel

    Dear Vijay Guptaji,

    Your essay is full of originality due to the introduction of new concepts like knergy, konservation and unary law which form part of your formulation of Pico physics. According to you, Space contains Energy and integrating geometrical properties of space gives us unary law. You have nicely summed up the intention behind formulating Pico physics by saying that "understanding facts of nature whether identified in contemporary science or embedded in human psychology"; thus combining both science and mind in one frame of reference. This is a wise intention to engulf whole of human wisdom on a single theme. But such sort of things needs to be accepted by at least a part of the scientific community and it requires your enormous effort to earn that recognition. I hope, you prevail up on this and get your work recognized by the scientific community. Wish you all the best in your endeavor. Please go through my essay also (http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1827) and express your comments on it in my thread. After seeing your comments, I am going to rate your essay with maximum possible score, although you care least for it.

    Best regards,

    Sreenath

    Dear Vijay Gupta,

    I invite you to comment my essay and evaluate it. I gave a high rating of 14.07 your research and ideas - "happy nine".

    Best regards,

    Vladimir

    Dear Vijay Guptaji,

    I have rated your highly classical essay with maximum possible score.

    Best regards,

    Sreenath

    Resp Vijay sab,

    I am sorry I did not see your post, as I did not get any intimation from FQXi. I posted questions many places and I could not do follow up, I am sorry for that.

    You are correct, Bigbang generated CMBR was not found yet, there are many problems in Bigbang.

    Yes sir, Your essay excellent. And we can work together.

    Please contact me

    snp.gupta@gmail.com

    you may please give me your ID so that I can send my books to you...

    Best

    =snp

    8 days later

    Dear Vijay Gupta,

    Thanks for the reply above. I've now rated your essay highly as I think it deserves to be further up the rankings. Please take a look at my essay if you get chance.

    Best wishes,

    Antony

    Dear Vijay,

    I have now finished reviewing all 180 essays for the contest and appreciate your contribution to this competition.

    I have been thoroughly impressed at the breadth, depth and quality of the ideas represented in this contest. In true academic spirit, if you have not yet reviewed my essay, I invite you to do so and leave your comments.

    You can find the latest version of my essay here:

    http://fqxi.org/data/forum-attachments/Borrill-TimeOne-V1.1a.pdf

    (sorry if the fqxi web site splits this url up, I haven't figured out a way to not make it do that).

    May the best essays win!

    Kind regards,

    Paul Borrill

    paul at borrill dot com

    Hello Vijay,

    Any more developments in picophysics? Hope the research is going well!?

    Regards,

    Antony

      thanks. I dill notify as soon as any addition is posted on picophysics.org

      for living I have to take my time away from picophysics

      Write a Reply...