Formulation of Unary Law of PicoPhysics by Vijay Mohan Gupta

Dear Mr Satyavarapu Ji,

Thanks for asking the question. Pico Physics integrates current laws of physics into a single law - Unary Law. This essay provides one aspect of formulation of unary law, as others in contemporary science are found deficient in some respect to fill the role.

CMBR from Big Bang is a hypothesis. It is another matter that contemporary physicts tend to agree with the proposition.

Cooling of photons into CMBR can not be a experiment in the sense it can only be concluded as interpretation of observation of cosmological events. We have already started seeing the Big Bang being challenged by new observation into oscillating universe etc. These observations where hobble's constant seem to change or recession of distant stars/galaxies decreasing/increasing can be qualitatively explained though a single thought process originating from Unary law.

Creation of matter: No. We don't want to conduct these experiments. Experiments will necessary be in dismantling the confinement of Knergy in space (Nucleus) that can be dangerous. So before conducting experiments we need to have an understanding to control the result of experimentation.

Look forward to receiving your evaluation and comments on essay 'Formulation of Unary law'. I hope for your support and working with you to further develop PicoPhysics.

Vijay Gupta

905 771 0024

Proponent Unary Law (Space Contains Knergy)

Thanks Harlan Swyers,

In cosmology, some identify the cosmological constant as equivalent to an energy density in otherwise empty space. Since PicoPhysics identifies contemporary energy as rate of consumption of space, It is +ive where Matter is present. In empty space (devoid of matter) it is slightly negative. The balance is achieved when space consumed by matter equals the generated space.

It can be seen, depending on distribution of matter between source and receiver the shift in spectrum of received radiation can vary. This result in general observation identified with Hubble's Law, as well as accelerating and pulsing universe. Geometrically universe is seen in equilibrium in PicoPhysics with other possibility (Accelerating/pulsing) being temporal in nature.

Vijay

Proponent Unary Law - Space contains Knergy

I read your essay that deals with 'Quantum information theory'. PicoPhysics is a deterministic theory. Instead of probability, it talks in terms of possibility.

Thanks for your comemnts.

Vijay Gupta

Proponent Unary Law - Space contains Knergy

Hello Akinbo,

The heterogeneity of space is defined by unary law itself. "Space Contains Knergy" defines existence of Knergy in space as some isolated regions containing Knergy while others don't. This is the primary cause of heterogeneity of space.

Yes, I have a proof of Pythagoras' Theorem not based on geometrical properties. In Pico physics all properties of space are derived from unary law. The tool to begin thinking as a PicoPhysist is infinite maths and k-diagram to understand heterogeneity of space.

My article on 5-D universe ; fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1326 contains the beginning and important elements of Infinite Maths.

Vijay Gupta

Proponent Unary Law "Space Conatins Knergy"

Thanks Vladimir.

This forum gives us (who are short on time) to get an audience for expressing the way we have understood the nature around us.

We have discovered the difference between data, information, knowledge and understanding. While I got my knowledge by education and learning, understanding is more internal and comes out of hypothesis and logic one constructs for himself. PicoPhysics is one such construct to convert "knowledge about" to "understanding of" nature.

Thanks again for your very encouraging comments.

Vijay Gupta

Prpoponent Unary Law 'Space Contains Knergy'.

I read and commented on your essay. In my comments on this excellent essay I have suggested a look at my essay at 5-D universe . I will advice a look at my comments in discussions as well. An example is below:

Dear Mr Steve Dufourny,

It is my pleasure to read your comments. Many mainstream physics experts will feel the same. Text of your comments hints to some basic questions. I will try my best to formulate and reply to them.

Before I address the questions, the 5-Dimensional universe to me is same as simple fact that Energy exists in Space. We can not intuitively conceive of energy existing without space. To this fact we add following observations taking them as facts;

a. There is no observation of negative energy objects. Negative energy is conceived as a difference between two positive values (differential potential energy). So for energy, there is no negative as it exists for charge. When we apply conservation to energy, it is different than the conservation as applied to charge. To distinguish the two, we encapsulated conservation of energy as Konservation - Conservation without neutralization.

b. The next subject of analysis used in this analysis, is what we mean by observation. Is it different than measurement. Can we measure something that does not exist? The intuitive answer is, we can not measure something which does not exist. This is used to create subset from number set, as physical number set for use in measurement.

c. When we talk of dimesions, there is a reality in front of which we express the dimensions. For example dimension of area is 2 and volume is 3. When we are considering universe ( composed of energy existing in space), we are expressing dimensions of not only space but also include the dimensions of Energy.

d. When we consider area of two dimensions, we multiply value of each dimension. However, for energy we don't do the same. The reason I believe is because, we are not able to distinguish different infinities. But with new infinite series, we can distinguish between infinities. So we can treat Energy as normal two dimensional reality, and space three dimension identity.

This gives us 5-dimensions of the universe.

1. Respect General and Special Relativity; you are very correct. We must respect these theories. The attempt here is to understand these theories as result of something more fundamental. For example consider special relativity; Consider can you measure time and distance independently. You can consider any permutation and combination, but will end up the distance measurement is based on time or vice versa. One can argue that we can have independent unit for length and time and measure them independently. But this is a false argument. The basic unit of length at the core is arrived using speed of light and time. Thus dependency of time and distance is inherent law of nature. In my view this sits at core of observations such as Lorentz transformations and The Michelson-Morley experiment. This is expressed as mapping of chronological dimension onto one of three space dimensions.

2. General Relativity: Here again you are right. General relativity is seen by mainstream physics more as a set of mathematical tools to explain gravitation. However, in 5-dimensional model we give it a direct intuitive meaning consistent with observations. This is consistence not only with Newton's gravity but also with Cosmological expansion and cosmic background radiations. It may not clear at this point, but you will defiantly find that there is no contradiction between 5-dimensional universe and general relativity.

3. Without 3-D: You are right here also. Though I don't understand full context of your statement, but I can say, the unary law 'Space contains Knergy' itself is at the foundation for space to have 3-dimensions. It is not disputed. But when we study, or evaluate results of an experiment or observation, we always encounter both space and energy, and hence 5-dimensional universe is relevant to us all the time rather.

4. Complexity and singularities in 3-D space; Here again I agree with you. You will find the same further explanation on model of universe at http://picophysics.org/applications/model-of-universe/. I am working at putting something across on this, but need to cover simpler issues before coming to formation of elementary particles where these singularities will be explained.

Thanks for your valuable comments.

Vijay Gupta

Proponent Unary Law - Space Contains Knergy