Thank you very much for your encouragement.
This theory exists, it is called eDuality.
Thank you very much for your encouragement.
This theory exists, it is called eDuality.
Thank you for rating my essay Amazigh,
I shall try to read yours promptly and rate it before the deadline. I'll also comment if I have thoughts or questions to share.
Jonathan
Dear Michael,
Thank you very much for this information and your comments.
I did not know this work.
As I said, duality is everywhere. The elders also said.
What changes now, today we can explain things with the best of science.
It is like the motion. Aristotle advanced things, but it was necessary to wait for Galilee, with the experimental science to know more about it.
About your essay that is very relevant. I think duality is the basis of symmetry, what is your opinion ?
Best wishes,
Amazigh H.
Amazigh,
Thank you for a very succinct and direct essay.
I agree with you about the Yin and Yang of duality. It is the reciprocity between the Bit and It that generates the phenomenal universe (re: my essay "A Complex Conjugate Bit and It", which you have reviewed.)
Best wishes,
Richard
Dear Christian,
Thank you very much for your encouragement.
You saw very fair.
Actually I insist, as I know now, the first principle of all is duality.
You'll find out, hopefully in a few months.
Regarding the third point:
« 3) What do you think on my Statement Regarding the duality betweens and bit it, ie" Information physics tells how to work. Physics tells how to information flow "? »
If you permit, there is what I think:
« Information tells Energy how to flow. Energy carries Information. »
Here's how I see it, but not exactly. : Energy is the horse, the rider is Information.
Because Information is organised Energy.
In other words. All things in the Universe are information, even the space. Then, what information is ? It is the organized Energy.
Ok, what is the Energy then?
We know how it manifests itself, but we do not know what it is. This is the first reality, impossible to fundamentally explain or define.
Good luck and best wishes,
Amazigh H.
TAO and eDuality are like brother and sister.
For a long time I had noticed that the dice were loaded.
Thank you Richard,
With Yin and Yang correctly understood and modified in good manner.
Best wishes
Thank you Jonathan
Tank you for your grateful comments
Thank you for your grateful comments.
Thank you for your grateful comments.
And good luck in your futur projects.
I do not understand very clearly your thoughts.
I hesitate before telling you no definitively.
Dear William Amos Carine,
Yes, (e) is a mystery.
(e) for eEnergy, for a new science in coming : a binary Science, dual Science, fundamental Science.
I have discovered the functionning of eUniverse : eDuality is in all things, like motion.
And all things arising, by couple, pair.
« simple, complex », « wave, particle », « space, time », « matter, antimatter », « electicity, magnetism », « Weak force , Strong force », « gravity, expansion of space », and so on...
Duality is in all cultures (Egyptians, Greecs, Indians, Chineses, ...) and in each one of us, but never explained and equaled like in China.
The « Yin, Yang » duality is full of truth, but this must be completed and reinterpreted, like our Science.
eDuality is present in physics, mathematics, philosophy, economics, biology, chemistry, religion, our thinking, in computers and mechanical machinery, linguistics, and so on...
Each one of us speaks with eDuality.
eDuality is the same everywhere.
There is one kind of eDuality when this concept is clear known.
eUniverse is very simple at the begining, very complex after.
This eDuality, these opposites, these contraries, are the 0 and 1 of information.
It takes a book to explain all these concepts : eEnergy, eInfo, eReality, eDuality, and so on...
Good luck,
Amazigh H.
Thank you for your grateful comments.
And best wishes
See above, answer to William Amos Carine.
Thank you for your grateful comments.
And good.
Thank you for rating my essay,
And best wishes.
Amazigh,
Short remark about your statements.
'It is like the motion. Aristotle advanced things, but it was necessary to wait for Galilee, with the experimental science to know more about it'
Comm.Physicists can say that Galileo experiment with free fall bodies rejected Aristotle philosophical illusion on motion.Moreover, Galileo first formulated new fundamental principle ( principle of equivalence of inertia and gravitation ) used later by Newton and Einstein.Thus, this example can demonstrate an existence of opposition - wrong speculations vs scientific experiment.
'duality is the basis of symmetry'?
Comm.I think there is difference between physical and mathematical subcultures on notion duality based symmetry.It is complex definition.Dirac believed that physical symmetry could be connected with mathematical beauty. Schrodinger produced beautiful equation, but was not able to solve it ( mathematician Weyl brought it to perfection ).
Michael.
Thank you for your grateful comments and recommendation.
And best wishes